Article

2011-03-02 China-Japan-Koreas

Tanks Ready for Use Against Uprising in Pyongyang

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2011-03-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 See also FREEREPUBLIC > KIM JONG-IL ORDERS DOZENS [scores] OFTANKS TO BE DEPLOYED AROUND HIS RESIDENCE IN YOUNGSUNG, PYONGYANG, in response to Mubarak resignation.

* SAME > RUSSIA TO DEPLOY [anti-Naval]CRUISE MISSLES ON KURIL ISLANDS: INTERFAX.

YAKHONTS, + TOR-M2's ADMS.

FREEP POSTER - opined that IHO Russia senses coming war [US-China?]on the Korean Peninsula + is prepping accordingly???

* WORLD NEWS > FOOD FOR THOUGHT FOR NORTH KOREA'S SURVIVAL IS FOOD FOR THOUGHT IN SEOUL.

Youse name the Question(s), the SOKORS have to think about it + any possible consequences for SOUTH KOREA + KOREAN PEOPLE IN GENERAL.

* SAME > [SecDef Gates to West Point MA Army Kay-y-ydets] NEVER FIGHT A LAND WAR IN ASIA.

Methinks Radical Islam + Iran + Kimmie, etal. know that, hence thats precisely what they want the econ-troubled US to do???

Lest we fergit, 1990's CLINTONISM + OWG-NWO > AMERICA'S ENEMIES = D *** NG IT, WE DEMAND OUR GOD-GIVEN SECULAR RIGHT TO BE ATTACKED AND SAVED BY THE USA!

* SAME > DONALD KIRK: JAPAN TO FORCE THE US FROM OKINAWA?

North Korean Mil, Nuclear Threat = "Wild Card" + risk of consequent potens US-vs-China Regional War is causing Japan to rethink its traditional ABSOLUTE NUCLEAR, OTHER MIL, ETC. DEPENDENCE ON THE US FOR ITS NATIONAL, REGIONAL SECURITY.

Again, SOUTH KOREA has a vested interest in CHINA NOT TAKING OVER NORTH KOREA FOR ANY REASON.
DPRK ECON COLLAPSE = CHINA UNILATER TAKING OVER THE NORTH, TEMPORAILY OR PERMANENTLY, + IS UNLIKELY TO GIVE UP OR SHARE UNLESS THE USDOD MOSTLY OR WHOLLY PULLS OUT ITS MILFORS FROM SOUTH KOREA + NE ASIA.

* SAME > [Russ South Kuriles = Japan Northern Territories]ROZOFF: US BACKS JAPAN IN LOOMING CONFRONTATION WID RUSSIA.

Russia had summoned the US Envoy to explain the "why" of the US position on the Russo-Nippon Kuriles sovereignty dispute.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-03-02 02:05|| 2011-03-02 02:05|| Front Page Top

#2 please delete above, missend

Posted by gromky 2011-03-02 02:56|| 2011-03-02 02:56|| Front Page Top

#3 Done, gromky.

Posted by trailing wife 2011-03-02 10:32|| 2011-03-02 10:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Quite a lot there Joe, but why wouldn't the US take the Chinese deal, namely unified Korea in the ROK and no US forces on the peninsula?

Among others, who opposes this - isolationist/budget minded GOP, Japan, ROK itself, Russia?

What is the US security interest in a united and free Korea which requires troops on it's soil?

Posted by Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division 2011-03-02 16:34|| 2011-03-02 16:34|| Front Page Top

00:19 JosephMendiola
23:45 JosephMendiola
23:26 Bill Clinton
23:18 sherry
22:40 Fire and Ice
22:33 Fire and Ice
22:31 OldSpook
22:31 gorb
22:24 Barbara Skolaut
22:19 OldSpook
22:12 OldSpook
22:09 tu3031
22:02 Fat Bob Ebbuling4222
21:57 Fat Bob Ebbuling4222
21:56 Fire and Ice
21:55 Ho Chi Grutle5210
21:49 Fire and Ice
21:43 Frank G
21:23 tu3031
21:18 Dale
21:11 Dale
21:02 tu3031
20:58 Choluper Munster2900
20:55 RandomJD