Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 12/30/2011 View Thu 12/29/2011 View Wed 12/28/2011 View Tue 12/27/2011 View Mon 12/26/2011 View Sun 12/25/2011 View Sat 12/24/2011
1
2011-12-30 Home Front: Culture Wars
New tax on the poor: Internet gambling by states
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2011-12-30 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Most of all, bringing Internet gambling to America would hurt the poor, who are most affected when people lose money

But what about the folks who gain money? When you guys are done bitchin' and moanin' about one side of the argument, why not come over to mine and we'll talk about the other side as well.
Posted by gorb 2011-12-30 03:11||   2011-12-30 03:11|| Front Page Top

#2 Most of all, bringing Internet gambling to America would hurt the poor, who are most affected when people lose money

.."we must protect people from themselves". Gee, how has that worked out? Of course when the non-poor people lose theirs, they get the government to bail them out. It's called TARP and other imaginative names.

We're starting to reach the addicts withdraw point where governments are desperate to find new a new tax fix rather than scaling down operations.

BTW - State lotteries, for examples, have a poor record of preventing retailers from selling tickets to minors.

Anyone have evidence for this statement?

Posted by P2Kontheroad 2011-12-30 07:37||   2011-12-30 07:37|| Front Page Top

#3 People who want to gamble have lots of convenient and illegal ways to get their fix. State-level gambling prohibition is a fool's game that simultaneously exposes gamblers to unfair odds from illegal gambling dens and bookies and deprives governments of a share of gambling profits.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2011-12-30 20:21||   2011-12-30 20:21|| Front Page Top

#4 State sponsored gambling is not a tax on the poor. It's a tax on people who are bad at math. Admittedly, those people often turn out to be poor.
Posted by AuburnTom 2011-12-30 20:52||   2011-12-30 20:52|| Front Page Top

#5 "State sponsored gambling is not a tax on the poor. It's a tax on people who are bad at math. Admittedly, those people often turn out to be poor."

Agreed, Tom. If you look at the people who play the lottery (or engage in other forms of gambling), they often show a pattern of making lousy life choices - which usually leads one to be poor.
Posted by Barbara 2011-12-30 22:36||   2011-12-30 22:36|| Front Page Top

23:38 Creregum Glolump8403
23:31 rammer
23:20 rammer
23:05 Slomp Oppressor of the Faeries1490
23:01 JosephMendiola
22:55 Water Modem
22:38 Bill Clinton
22:37 JosephMendiola
22:36 Barbara
22:31 Barbara
22:29 JosephMendiola
22:22 Barbara
22:18 Barbara
22:10 JohnQC
22:09 JosephMendiola
21:58 JohnQC
21:57 JohnQC
21:42 tipper
21:19 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:52 AuburnTom
20:41 Dale
20:39 Dale
20:29 American Delight
20:26 Dale









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com