Article

2015-09-18 Science & Technology

New catalyst that improves the sensitivity of the standard PSA test over 100-fold

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Sven the pelter 2015-09-18 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 What about false positives? PSA is notoriously inaccurate, and end up with painful surgery to do the biopsy whcih turns out was negative to begin with.

Plus PSA levels can be raised by urinary tract infections, or recent irritation of the prostate, by a foley catheter during surgery for example.

Posted by OldSpook 2015-09-18 01:21|| 2015-09-18 01:21|| Front Page Top

#2 A better PSA test would be a good thing. More, less invasive treatment options would also be a good thing. As of now, radiation (there are different kinds of radiation delivery methods), chemo, surgery, hormone therapy, watchful waiting, and cryosurgery are the major methods of dealing with PC. A recent development called Provenge (autologous cellular immunotherapy) is available and might provide some benefit. It gives your immune system a boost to fight off the cancer.

PC is often confused with another condition called benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH)--enlargement of the prostate that comes with age. Another concern about biopsies is that the procedure might break the prostate capsule and actually spread cancer cells to other parts of the body. Generally 12 needle samples are taken in the area between your penis and your rectum. A somewhat painful procedure. I asked my urologist if this was going to be painful; he said "It has never hurt me." I found a new urologist.

The PSA test and digital rectal exam are the first line of defense against PC. These generally indicate whether a biopsy is indicated. The good news is that if PC is caught early, the 5 year survival rate is high with surgery or radiation (>95%+). The 10 year survival rate is slightly less.

September is Prostate Cancer survival month.

Posted by JohnQC 2015-09-18 08:14|| 2015-09-18 08:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Yes, the false positive result is MUCH more common (like twenty times higher) and causes all kinds of additional testing, spending, and possible harm as JohnQC describes.

However, there is no additional money to be made from negative results, so eliminating false positives isn't going to get any research money from industry.

Posted by rammer 2015-09-18 14:54|| 2015-09-18 14:54|| Front Page Top

23:55 JosephMendiola
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:34 Sven the pelter
23:12 KBK
23:09 Sven the pelter
22:47 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:45 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:33 JosephMendiola
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:12 JosephMendiola
22:04 Barbara
21:54 Frank G
21:25 Procopius2k
20:42 trailing wife
20:31 Frank G
20:29 Frank G
19:59 Frank G
19:29 Blossom Unains5562
19:29 JohnQC
19:28 Ebbang Uluque6305
19:26 JohnQC
19:20 Procopius2k
19:19 Angavique7494