Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 10/24/2015 View Fri 10/23/2015 View Thu 10/22/2015 View Wed 10/21/2015 View Tue 10/20/2015 View Mon 10/19/2015 View Sun 10/18/2015
1
2015-10-24 Economy
Feds Approve First New Nuclear Reactor In 20 Years
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2015-10-24 05:35|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 I hope they got it right. I live 30 miles downwind.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2015-10-24 05:47||   2015-10-24 05:47|| Front Page Top

#2 What could possibly go wrong ?
Posted by Besoeker 2015-10-24 06:02||   2015-10-24 06:02|| Front Page Top

#3 Now, the long unending court fights by the greenies.
Posted by Procopius2k 2015-10-24 08:49||   2015-10-24 08:49|| Front Page Top

#4 Hopefully, and I mean I really hope, by the time this is ready to come online one of the Fusion start-ups will have produced a working design that produces more energy than it takes to run. Even better would be the Proton/Boron11 reaction cycle that offers the direct conversion to electricity. And I think the start-ups are the best bet because I sure don't trust any of the government backed research such as ITER to work. With the possible exception of the Navy's such efforts. After all the Navy is interested in a useful end product. The DOEs fusion researchers are interested more in process, expermentation, discussions, meetings and their end product is of course the Holy Grail of acedamia "Publication". The DOEs efforts have been more about producing papers and phds than electricity. After all if we had cheap electricity our betters (the afore mentioned phds) might be offended that we might use that energy to run our A/G's or other such nonsense.
Posted by Cheaderhead 2015-10-24 10:00||   2015-10-24 10:00|| Front Page Top

#5 Also, when Fusion finally becomes possibe the Greens will fight it tooth and nail. Because it isn't "re-newable". It isn't "green". It isn't "Earth friendly". Oh, wait we can't say "Earth". It has to be "earth" because the capitalization of the first letter might be construed as "sexist", "racist", or poosibly religous. Better to tell everybody the reactor runs on pixie dust and harmonious thoughts
Posted by Cheaderhead 2015-10-24 10:06||   2015-10-24 10:06|| Front Page Top

#6 I live 30 miles downwind.

This is the second reactor at the site. Watts Bar 1 has been online nearly 20 years. 2300 MW is the two reactors total capacity.

BTW, WB-1 also produces tritium for US nuke weapons.
Posted by Betty Hitler2611 2015-10-24 10:13||   2015-10-24 10:13|| Front Page Top

#7 Does anybody remember that when Sir/St Thomas More wrote Utopia the word literally meant "nowhere"
Posted by Cheaderhead 2015-10-24 10:39||   2015-10-24 10:39|| Front Page Top

#8 This is the second reactor at the site.
The people that built No 1 are not the ones that built No 2. The present Authority can't keep an Ash Pond in one place.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2015-10-24 12:24||   2015-10-24 12:24|| Front Page Top

21:38 Barbara
21:34 Barbara
21:27 chris
20:45 Frank G
20:34 Frank G
20:11 Frank G
20:06 Jack salami
19:39 Barbara
19:12 swksvolFF
17:45 g(r)omgoru
17:28 Shipman
17:25 Shipman
17:21 Shipman
17:19 Mike Kozlowski
17:12 Shipman
17:01 Shuting Gurly-Brown7975
16:27 Procopius2k
16:17 swksvolFF
16:00 newc
15:55 NoMoreBS
15:51 g(r)omgoru
15:33 Procopius2k
15:32 Sven the pelter
15:31 Sven the pelter









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com