Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 06/30/2018 View Fri 06/29/2018 View Thu 06/28/2018 View Wed 06/27/2018 View Tue 06/26/2018 View Mon 06/25/2018 View Sun 06/24/2018
1
2018-06-30 Government
Air Force awards nearly $900 million for new bunker buster bombs
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2018-06-30 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Just drop Rosie O'Donnell on whatever it is.
Posted by gorb 2018-06-30 03:40||   2018-06-30 03:40|| Front Page Top

#2 The new bunker buster bombs will be less likely to fail to explode than those currently being used

There's a batch in the inventory that don't go BOOM? Wonder who that contractor was and why a new batch was ordered.
Posted by Skidmark 2018-06-30 03:54||   2018-06-30 03:54|| Front Page Top

#3 Wonder who that contractor was and why a new batch was ordered.
Posted by: Skidmark 2018-06-30 03:54


Skid,

Actually not so much a matter of bad bombs as better tech - remember that a bunker buster has to go through a considerable distance of dirt, concrete, steel, and other impediments before exploding, and it takes a heck of a beating before getting there. A better bunker buster (say that three times quickly) with improved steel and electronics (better to survive that short, exciting trip) is more likely to survive and go off just where and when we want it to, not to mention increasing your options as to what you can hit. The BLU-137 they mention is actually an upgraded version (still uses the same basic shape and explosives filler) of the old BLU-109, which entered service in the mid-80s and has done very, very well for us - but the bad guys' bunker tech has advanced over time, and we're doing the right thing by upping our game as well.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2018-06-30 05:06||   2018-06-30 05:06|| Front Page Top

#4 Keeps Superior Forge and Steel going and also sends a message to the NORKS and Iran. Money well spent.
Posted by Besoeker 2018-06-30 05:14||   2018-06-30 05:14|| Front Page Top

#5 indefinite-quantity contracts

I'm only on the first cup of coffee, and man, that line brought a smile to my face. As long as the ayatollahs have the opposite reaction...
Posted by Raj 2018-06-30 05:33||   2018-06-30 05:33|| Front Page Top

#6 Speak loudly and carry an even bigger stick.
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-06-30 07:56||   2018-06-30 07:56|| Front Page Top

#7 gorb, I think the Geneva Conventions have something to say about that.
Posted by AlanC 2018-06-30 08:35||   2018-06-30 08:35|| Front Page Top

#8 Seems to me that the answer is not 'bigger' but a series of precisely timed 'shaped charges' where each follows the previous one in the time between excavation of rubble and the falling of that rubble back into the crater. Kind of like pushing a kid on a swing, in small increments, or like constructive interference of waves.
Posted by Glenmore 2018-06-30 18:25||   2018-06-30 18:25|| Front Page Top

23:35 Cheamble Big Foot2238
23:31 Cheamble Big Foot2238
23:28 trailing wife
22:42 Zenobia Floger6220
21:59 JohnQC
21:44 Skidmark
21:31 JohnQC
21:20 gorb
21:15 gorb
21:04 European Conservative
20:57 Besoeker
20:54 gorb
20:53 European Conservative
20:52 European Conservative
20:41 Besoeker
20:37 European Conservative
20:36 Besoeker
20:32 European Conservative
20:32 Besoeker
20:04 Old Patriot
20:00 Bobby
19:58 JohnQC
19:42 NoMoreBS
19:41 Old Patriot









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com