Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 10/26/2019 View Fri 10/25/2019 View Thu 10/24/2019 View Wed 10/23/2019 View Tue 10/22/2019 View Mon 10/21/2019 View Sun 10/20/2019
1
2019-10-26 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Lisa Page edited the Flynn 302, Clapper ordered WaPo to “take the kill shot on Flynn”
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2019-10-26 01:50|| || Front Page|| [11138 views ]  Top

#1 Appears Lisa Page may finally be eating cheese on the bastids to save her arse. Hat tip to Ms. Powell.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-10-26 02:16||   2019-10-26 02:16|| Front Page Top

#2 Sic' em, Sydney!
Posted by Lex 2019-10-26 03:37||   2019-10-26 03:37|| Front Page Top

#3 So she lied to the FBI. Does she get the Flynn treatment?
Posted by Frank G 2019-10-26 07:55||   2019-10-26 07:55|| Front Page Top

#4  Does she get the Flynn treatment?

I'd imagine the US taxpayer is getting raped good and hard to provide protection to Page, Strzoc et al.
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-10-26 09:53||   2019-10-26 09:53|| Front Page Top

#5 I'm not sure of the meaning of this any contextual links?

"Lisa Page edited the Flynn 302." From - To?

"James Clapper told WaPo reporter Ignatius to basically "take the kill shot on Flynn"" sounds dodgy but...

is #2 linked to #1?
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2019-10-26 11:23||   2019-10-26 11:23|| Front Page Top

#6 Tough to read this Twitter stuff and make any sense of it.
Posted by One Eyed Ghibelline9404 2019-10-26 11:35||   2019-10-26 11:35|| Front Page Top

#7 ^ Future anthropologists will debate the meaning of Shitter Twitter Twits the way today's anthropologists study Dark Age runes
Posted by Lex 2019-10-26 11:40||   2019-10-26 11:40|| Front Page Top

#8 is #2 linked to #1?

Both are part of the same plot to hobble President Trump by taking out his national security advisor, General Michael Flynn, by a variety of in-house and external means, Bright Pebbles. Power Line blog discusses these revelations in more detail here.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-10-26 15:47||   2019-10-26 15:47|| Front Page Top

#9 ^ stunning, TW. Maybe deserves its own thread, with the excerpts pasted in the article?

INAL but this certainly seems like a smoking gun, or small armory of them.
Posted by Lex 2019-10-26 16:03||   2019-10-26 16:03|| Front Page Top

#10 I'm not sure of the meaning of this any contextual links?

It matters because of the timeline. The 302 was deceptively "edited" 2 weeks after its submission.

Sidney Powell Drops Bombshell Showing How The FBI Trapped Michael Flynn
A sealed statement from Strzok confirmed that the “agents did three briefings the day of the interview,” and that Strzok had reported that Flynn “had a sure demeanor, and he was telling the truth or believed he was—even though he did not remember it all.” This led the FBI and DOJ to then write “an internal memo dated January 30, 2017, exonerating Mr. Flynn of acting as an ‘agent of Russia’” and expressing no concern of a possible Logan Act violation.
Then the Switch on the 302

But then things change.

“On February 10, 2017, the news broke—attributed to ‘senior intelligence officials’—that Mr. Flynn had discussed sanctions with Ambassador Kislyak, contrary to what Vice President Pence had said on television previously.” Following this leak, “overnight,” Flynn’s 302 was changed—and substantively so. “Those changes added an unequivocal statement that ‘FLYNN stated he did not’—in response to whether Mr. Flynn had asked Kislyak to vote in a certain manner or slow down the UN vote.”

“This is a deceptive manipulation” Powell highlighted, “because, as the notes of the agents show, Mr. Flynn was not even sure he had spoken to Russia/Kislyak on this issue. He had talked to dozens of countries.” The overnight changes to the 302 also included the addition of a line, indicating Flynn had been question on whether “KISLYAK described any Russian response to a request by FLYNN.”

But the agent’s notes do not include that question or answer, Powell stressed, yet it was later made into the criminal offense charges against Flynn. And “the draft also shows that the agents moved a sentence to make it seem to be an answer to a question it was not,” Powell added.
Posted by Pancho Flerens6518 2019-10-26 17:59||   2019-10-26 17:59|| Front Page Top

#11 Those FBI and DOJ agents who did this must to go to prison for a long time.
Posted by Pancho Flerens6518 2019-10-26 18:02||   2019-10-26 18:02|| Front Page Top

#12 Maybe deserves its own thread, with the excerpts pasted in the article?

It’s not really something I’m following, Lex, more something I happened across that fit this conversation while looking at other things. But I’m sure there will be more articles posted as the story develops.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-10-26 20:02||   2019-10-26 20:02|| Front Page Top

23:41 3dc
22:20 Lex
21:59 ruprecht
21:25 Dron66046
20:38 Lex
20:02 trailing wife
19:59 Dron66046
19:45 Dron66046
19:37 Dron66046
19:34 Lex
19:16 Crinenter the Eponymous8647
19:09 Crinenter the Eponymous8647
18:53 Angens Turkeyneck2026
18:10 Skidmark
18:03 Skidmark
18:02 Pancho Flerens6518
18:00 Skidmark
17:59 M. Murcek
17:59 Pancho Flerens6518
17:56 Skidmark
17:55 Skidmark
17:52 Skidmark
17:38 Pancho Flerens6518
17:16 Charles









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com