Article

2019-12-21 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Moving to Chicago sure upped Boeing's game...

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top

#1 Sort of in the Signs and Portents region of management ~~malfeasance~~ failures.

Posted by Procopius2k 2019-12-21 07:33|| 2019-12-21 07:33|| Front Page Top

#2 So the Atlas rocket failed and the payload is at fault because Boeing moved some offices to Chicago? OK, I get it.

Posted by 49 Pan 2019-12-21 07:45|| 2019-12-21 07:45|| Front Page Top

#3 ...their 'new' commercial airlines certainly is crashing the market, so to speak.

Posted by Procopius2k 2019-12-21 09:32|| 2019-12-21 09:32|| Front Page Top

#4 The notion that corporate culture at the head office has no effect on product is peculiar.

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 11:11|| 2019-12-21 11:11|| Front Page Top

#5 Ah, but how is their diversity program? That's the important bit.

Posted by James 2019-12-21 11:29|| https://idontknowbut.blogspot.com 2019-12-21 11:29|| Front Page Top

#6 BTW a side point. Boeing designed the capsule to be able to be launched on an Atlas, Vulcan or F9. So if they need to do a bunch of cheap testing they could use end of life F9 boosters.

Posted by 3dc 2019-12-21 11:55|| 2019-12-21 11:55|| Front Page Top

#7 Much as some people hate it, SLS and Vulcan will make or break Boeing and ULA.

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 12:11|| 2019-12-21 12:11|| Front Page Top

#8 Of course, Boeing is still trying to wring money out of F-15(X) so their corporate culture sort of makes a tell there.

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 12:13|| 2019-12-21 12:13|| Front Page Top

#9 Or they could do a software retro-fit. Like with the 737 MAX.
Oh wait

Posted by Lex 2019-12-21 12:40|| 2019-12-21 12:40|| Front Page Top

#10 Apollo guidance computer

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 12:42|| 2019-12-21 12:42|| Front Page Top

#11 The "insertion burns" were handled by the clock on the "payload" #2, so it wasn't the "Atlas rocket" that failed. K?

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 13:33|| 2019-12-21 13:33|| Front Page Top

#12 And I'm sure everyone is in a hurry to ride this...

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 15:32|| 2019-12-21 15:32|| Front Page Top

#13 The boost by the Atlas was near perfect. It was the Starliner thruster onboard sequencing that STB.

Once again, bad code from Boeing.

Posted by The peanut gallery 2019-12-21 17:09|| 2019-12-21 17:09|| Front Page Top

#14 As I said in the other thread. They are an engineering company or a company that wants to be where Bath House runs. It really can't be both.

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-21 17:17|| 2019-12-21 17:17|| Front Page Top

23:59 Dopey Panda2315
23:21 trailing wife
23:10 trailing wife
23:05 Alaska Paul
22:14 Alaska Paul
21:57 Fred
20:21 Zhang Fei
20:03 Lex
20:01 Lex
19:56 Lex
19:52 Lex
19:20 Lex
19:18 Lex
19:14 Lex
19:13 Lex
19:04 Lex
18:24 Frank G
18:04 trailing wife
17:46 trailing wife
17:33 Bright Pebbles
17:33 M. Murcek
17:28 Dron66046
17:17 M. Murcek
17:11 Frank G