Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 06/05/2020 View Thu 06/04/2020 View Wed 06/03/2020 View Tue 06/02/2020 View Mon 06/01/2020 View Sun 05/31/2020 View Sat 05/30/2020
1
2020-06-05 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Lancet formallly retracts HCQ study
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by lord garth 2020-06-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 a dose-response relationship existed between frequency of exposure to HCQ and such reductions.

The thing to look for when establishment fakes clinical trials.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-06-05 02:27||   2020-06-05 02:27|| Front Page Top

#2 There's an awful lot of fake-science used to make fake-news.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-06-05 03:18||   2020-06-05 03:18|| Front Page Top

#3 Politicization of science and medicine? Can one not count on anything to be truthful>
Posted by JohnQC 2020-06-05 08:41||   2020-06-05 08:41|| Front Page Top

#4 Network newscasts skip major hydroxychloroquine report retractions, org says
Posted by Skidmark 2020-06-05 12:02||   2020-06-05 12:02|| Front Page Top

#5 CDC boss apologizes for 'inadequate' race-based coronavirus data
Posted by Skidmark 2020-06-05 12:16||   2020-06-05 12:16|| Front Page Top

#6 Hydroxychloroquine does NOT treat Covid-19: Biggest study into the Donald Trump-backed anti-malaria drug is ended with 'immediate effect' after researchers found it made no difference
Posted by Skidmark 2020-06-05 12:20||   2020-06-05 12:20|| Front Page Top

#7 ^ Another hit job. Results were not due until July. They rushed this to coincide with the Lancet pulling its fraudulent paper.
Posted by Iblis 2020-06-05 12:26||   2020-06-05 12:26|| Front Page Top

#8 "It's just they don't have the data in that database to account for what they need to account for."

I got yer data right here - lemme pull it outta my ass...
Posted by Raj 2020-06-05 12:57||   2020-06-05 12:57|| Front Page Top

#9 the Oxford study on HCQ was for people already hospitalized

other studies have also found hcq isn't the right treatment for those people

hcq is, per the Yale study, the right treatment for outpatients, that is people who are positive and have mild symptoms - the point is to keep people from being hospitalized
Posted by lord garth 2020-06-05 15:13||   2020-06-05 15:13|| Front Page Top

#10 New England J of Medicine has retracted its hcq study. The study used as a data source the same sketchy company that the lancet study used but no formal statement from the NE J of M is available yet.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007621
Posted by lord garth 2020-06-05 16:22||   2020-06-05 16:22|| Front Page Top

23:36 Woodrow
23:35 CrazyFool
23:32 CrazyFool
22:54 Zhang Fei
21:55 Anomalous Sources
21:43 Anomalous Sources
21:11 Lex
20:40 Large Darling of the Bunions9752
20:31 Large Darling of the Bunions9752
20:31 bbrewer126
20:26 bbrewer126
20:11 bbrewer126
20:07 bbrewer126
19:38 charger
19:32 Glenmore
19:28 Glenmore
19:27 Glenmore
19:25 Glenmore
19:23 Glenmore
19:15 Procopius2k
19:13 Procopius2k
19:10 Clem
19:07 Clem
19:03 Mercutio









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com