Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/22/2020 View Wed 10/21/2020 View Tue 10/20/2020 View Mon 10/19/2020 View Sun 10/18/2020 View Sat 10/17/2020 View Fri 10/16/2020
1
2020-10-22 Home Front: Politix
Wikipedia says Hunter Biden scandal 'DEBUNKED'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2020-10-22 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11136 views ]  Top

#1 I'm going to guess that half of the donors to the site are done with them.
Posted by gorb 2020-10-22 01:02||   2020-10-22 01:02|| Front Page Top

#2 So much for a reputation of reliable information. Amazing how many rather burn any integrity over the lust for power. It can only be so when they believe that once they get power again, they'll never give it up. Welcome to the world of the Soviet Encyclopedia.
Posted by Procopius2k 2020-10-22 08:58||   2020-10-22 08:58|| Front Page Top

#3 Read an article yesterday (well, just the first paragraph as I stopped reading) where they flat out (as if a priori/fact) called all this "dubious". It's f'in disgusting.
Posted by Clem 2020-10-22 09:20||   2020-10-22 09:20|| Front Page Top

#4 Just add "[citation needed]" to the "debunked" claim.
Posted by Rob Crawford 2020-10-22 09:40||   2020-10-22 09:40|| Front Page Top

#5 Debunked is for those who believe Bill "did not have sex" with that woman
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-10-22 09:46||   2020-10-22 09:46|| Front Page Top

#6 Political items with the Dems is a bunch of lies surrounded by bodyguards of bull sh$t.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2020-10-22 10:40||   2020-10-22 10:40|| Front Page Top

#7 As a concept Wikipedia was a noble idea. But lefties are far more zealous about pushing their propaganda and everyone. Every once in a while a conservative position shows for a few hours, but inevitably the Liberal zealots wipe it out.
Posted by rjschwarz 2020-10-22 11:05||   2020-10-22 11:05|| Front Page Top

#8 'Reliable Information', Hah! For the melting point of Tungsten, sure maybe.
Posted by magpie 2020-10-22 12:44||   2020-10-22 12:44|| Front Page Top

#9 A standard reply of the left when they are under scrutiny: "Oh, that. It was debunked or discredited long ago." See Hillary Clinton's, Jim Comey, etc. responses before Congress or before real news reporters. A variation is "I never had sex with that woman." Yawn.
Posted by JohnQC 2020-10-22 14:06||   2020-10-22 14:06|| Front Page Top

#10 Wikipedia has had 'volunteer' editors (probably wearing pajamas in a basement somewhere) for some time that diligently monitor their respective interest pages. I put something up there several years ago that I knew to be absolutely true, and within minutes that had been changed.

I'll use it for looking up old movies and geography stuff, but that's about it.
Posted by Mullah Richard 2020-10-22 16:04||   2020-10-22 16:04|| Front Page Top

#11 Their tech staff is quite good - at least if you looking up a new subject.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-10-22 16:20||   2020-10-22 16:20|| Front Page Top

#12 I mostly check anime info and movies on it. Sometimes basic info. Beyond that, no.
Posted by Silentbrick 2020-10-22 19:24||   2020-10-22 19:24|| Front Page Top

#13 Any opinion topics, especially hot topics and people biographies, should be viewed with skepticism.

I'd like to see the John Wayne wiki from 5 years ago compared to today.
Posted by swksvolFF 2020-10-22 22:00||   2020-10-22 22:00|| Front Page Top

23:56 Betty Crimble7900
23:20 swksvolFF
22:59 charger
22:07 swksvolFF
22:00 swksvolFF
21:38 Enver Dribble3392
21:29 Cluper and Company4908
21:10 Ebbomoger Speaking for Boskone4589
20:42 Frank G
19:35 Clem
19:34 Clem
19:32 Clem
19:27 Clem
19:25 Clem
19:24 Angolugum Splat4152
19:24 Silentbrick
19:22 Lord Garth
19:22 Rupert Slirong6544
19:22 Clem
19:09 b
19:07 Frank G
19:03 Dino Omomble9051
19:03 b
18:50 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com