Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 03/12/2023 View Sat 03/11/2023 View Fri 03/10/2023 View Thu 03/09/2023 View Wed 03/08/2023 View Tue 03/07/2023 View Mon 03/06/2023
1
2023-03-12 Government Corruption
Where were the regulators on SVB?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2023-03-12 07:02|| || Front Page|| [15 views ]  Top

#1 To be fair to SVB, this is what every bank does. They take short-term deposits (like your checking account, which you can spend from whenever you feel like it) and invest in relatively longer-term assets. This is one of the ways that banks make money.

Managing this risk is the job of two departments: Risk Management (which generally is composed of the most clueless people in the bank) and Treasury(which generally has much sharper and more capable people.) If they fail to manage the risk properly, then...

But again, the fact that SVB did not get loans from the Fed but rather was seized outright by the FDIC makes me think something much more was involved here.
Posted by Tom 2023-03-12 13:45||   2023-03-12 13:45|| Front Page Top

#2 Risk Management (which generally is composed of the most clueless people in the bank)

LOL -- not only that, but merely having a Risk Management Department implies to the public that Risk is being "Managed", which is a pleasing illusion. Enron had risk managers every ten feet in the building and risk models that would give Einstein a headache.

The Am Thinker articles implies that the FDIC just sits back and reads call reports. There's a very remote chance that's true here, but I've seen situations in which the FDIC had examiners onsite permanently, and one big deal in which regulators attended board meetings and had substantial input. So I'd be interested in seeing how that shakes out here.
Posted by Matt 2023-03-12 15:09||   2023-03-12 15:09|| Front Page Top

#3 From the FDICs perspective they might not have much focus on a bank like SVB because the FDIC is only really on the hook for 3% of the deposits. This was not a mom and pop operation where the FDIC would be on the hook for 90% of deposits.
Posted by Airandee 2023-03-12 15:40||   2023-03-12 15:40|| Front Page Top

23:38 Skidmark
23:09 DooDahMan
23:06 DarthVader
22:43 trailing wife
22:21 Xyz
21:30 irish rage boy
21:19 Percy Flotle3938
21:18 Percy Flotle3938
20:16 Vortigern Omoluque9456
19:52 ed in texas
19:45 SteveS
19:15 lord garth
18:57 Anomalous Sources
18:47 Anomalous Sources
18:11 Super Hose
17:56 Deacon Blues
17:53 Deacon Blues
17:47 Deacon Blues
17:42 Deacon Blues
17:38 Frank G
17:22 Anomalous Sources
15:59 DarthVader
15:50 Super Hose
15:44 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com