Article

2023-09-08 Government Corruption

Some interesting sidenotes to Larry Sinclair's tale of sex and drugs with Obama

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by The Walking Unvaxed 2023-09-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11 views ] Top

#1 Mr Sinclair has a long history of tangles with the law. He also has no physical evidence to back up any of his claims.

Posted by lord garth 2023-09-08 00:28|| 2023-09-08 00:28|| Front Page Top

#2 They didn’t call him Bath House Barry for nothing…

Posted by Itsoktobewhite 2023-09-08 01:02|| 2023-09-08 01:02|| Front Page Top

#3 Barstool Sports' Dave Portnoy slams Tucker Carlson's interview with fraudster Larry Sinclair and says his tale of sex with Barack Obama 'has 0.0% chance of being true'

Posted by Skidmark 2023-09-08 01:44|| 2023-09-08 01:44|| Front Page Top

#4 And the folks frequenting the bars in Chicago's Pride district just smile, never telling tales about 'one of their own'.

Posted by Mullah Richard 2023-09-08 07:20|| 2023-09-08 07:20|| Front Page Top

#5 I think the important aspect isn't the veracity of the accuser, it's that the citizens get to decide whether we believe him or not and what that ultimately means in terms of our decisions going forward.

Is Portnoy right? No idea, but he makes good points as does Lord Garth. In the end none of us were 'there', thank God, and we have to make our own judgements. You know, like they did in the old, pre-woke days. Try and cobble some combination of such facts as can be gleaned, add in human experience and legitimate operating assumptions.

Censorship is the problem, not Sinclair, Tucker, or even the pestilential light bringer.

Posted by Cesare 2023-09-08 07:39|| 2023-09-08 07:39|| Front Page Top

#6 I could give a damn who sleeps with what, as long as it doesn't involve children or the livestock.

Posted by Mercutio 2023-09-08 07:54|| 2023-09-08 07:54|| Front Page Top

#7 ^ And I don't need to hear about it around the clock, have it up in my face all the time and I certainly don't need gummint clubbing me over the head to validate it. If those "life choices" are so superior, that should speak for itself, eh?

Posted by M. Murcek 2023-09-08 07:59|| 2023-09-08 07:59|| Front Page Top

#8 I had enough problems with Baraq before I ever heard Sinclair's story. He has no witnesses or evidence but he does have a history of lies and legal problems which makes me wonder why Tucker would bother with him.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2023-09-08 13:46|| 2023-09-08 13:46|| Front Page Top

#9 As a story, it sounded plausible if you remove Barrack Obama’s name. At this point the story is uncorroborated. The Clinton rape stories all were plausible as well. By plausible, I mean that the narrative doesn’t go Jussie Smollett or Kavanaugh accuser. Regardless, I think we are going to get to the bottom of some stuff over the next couple of months and then more in the next six years.

Posted by Bill Clunk5073 2023-09-08 16:55|| 2023-09-08 16:55|| Front Page Top

23:43 Bangkok Billy
23:33 Gomez Munster8068
23:24 Gomez Munster8068
21:48 Gomez Munster8068
21:14 Gomez Munster8068
20:53 Bangkok Billy
19:35 49 Pan
19:26 Frank G
19:08 49 Pan
19:08 Mercutio
18:50 Procopius2k
18:45 swksvolFF
18:41
18:35 Airandee
18:26 Crereque Clusogum7898
18:14 Frank G
18:09 swksvolFF
18:05 M. Murcek
17:44 Skidmark
17:41 Skidmark
17:36 Skidmark
17:36 Anomalous Sources
17:36 Nero
17:27 Mullah Richard