|
2020-08-16 -Lurid Crime Tales-
|
|
CIA Behind Guccifer & Russiagate – a Plausible Scenario
|
[Strategic Culture Foundation] William Binney is the former technical director of the U.S. National Security Agency who worked at the agency for 30 years. He is a respected independent critic of how American intelligence services abuse their powers to illegally spy on private communications of U.S. citizens and around the globe. Given his expert inside knowledge, it is worth paying attention to what Binney says.
In a media interview this week, he dismissed the so-called Russiagate scandal as a "fabrication" orchestrated by the American Central Intelligence Agency. Many other observers have come to the same conclusion about allegations that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections with the objective of helping Donald Trump get elected.
But what is particularly valuable about Binney’s judgment is that he cites technical analysis disproving the Russiagate narrative. That narrative remains dominant among U.S. intelligence officials, politicians and pundits, especially those affiliated with the Democrat party, as well as large sections of Western media. The premise of the narrative is the allegation that a Russian state-backed cyber operation hacked into the database and emails of the Democrat party back in 2016. The information perceived as damaging to presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was subsequently disseminated to the Wikileaks whistleblower site and other U.S. media outlets.
A mysterious cyber persona known as "Guccifer 2.0" claimed to be the alleged hacker. U.S. intelligence and news media have attributed Guccifer as a front for Russian cyber operations.
Notably, however, the Russian government has always categorically denied any involvement in alleged hacking or other interference in the 2016 U.S. election, or elections thereafter.
William Binney and other independent former U.S. intelligence experts say they can prove the Russiagate narrative is bogus. The proof relies on their forensic analysis of the data released by Guccifer. The analysis of timestamps demonstrates that the download of voluminous data could not have been physically possible based on known standard internet speeds. These independent experts conclude that the data from the Democrat party could not have been hacked, as Guccifer and Russiagaters claim. It could only have been obtained by a leak from inside the party, perhaps by a disgruntled staffer who downloaded the information on to a disc. That is the only feasible way such a huge amount of data could have been released. That means the "Russian hacker" claims are baseless.
Wikileaks, whose founder Julian Assange is currently imprisoned in Britain pending an extradition trial to the U.S. to face espionage charges, has consistently maintained that their source of files was not a hacker, nor did they collude with Russian intelligence. As a matter of principle, Wikileaks does not disclose the identity of its sources, but the organization has indicated it was an insider leak which provided the information on senior Democrat party corruption. 
|
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-16 03:58||
||
Front Page|| [12 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Clem 2020-08-16 05:53||
2020-08-16 05:53||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-08-16 06:35||
2020-08-16 06:35||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Clem 2020-08-16 06:42||
2020-08-16 06:42||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-16 07:34||
2020-08-16 07:34||
Front Page
Top
|
|
13:59 Grom the Reflective
13:45 mossomo
13:36 NoMoreBS
13:33 Abu Uluque
13:33 Cesare
13:30 Tom
13:29 Tom
13:21 Abu Uluque
13:07 Throlush Dark Lord of the Nebraskans2736
13:01 Throlush Dark Lord of the Nebraskans2736
12:59 mossomo
12:55 Super Hose
12:54 Super Hose
12:54 mossomo
12:50 Super Hose
12:47 746
12:45 Super Hose
12:42 mossomo
12:41 Super Hose
12:38 mossomo
12:37 mossomo
12:23 mossomo
12:21 Skidmark
12:18 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
|
Ref #2: Shortly after the tragic Seth Rich shooting, WikiLeaks and Assange issues sort of lost media attention. Strange, very strange. Or could it be just another coincidence ?