Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/01/2024 View Tue 04/30/2024 View Mon 04/29/2024 View Sun 04/28/2024 View Sat 04/27/2024 View Fri 04/26/2024 View Thu 04/25/2024
2022-01-06 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Meet Jed Rakoff, the Judge Who Exposed the "Rigged Game"
[TK News] "We have mass incarceration for the poor, and it’s totally hands-off for the rich, and that’s pretty hard to stomach." Justice Jed Rakoff on his new book, and his famous challenge to the system.

On November 27, 2011, a federal judge named Jed Rakoff threw out a $285 million regulatory settlement between Citigroup and the Securities and Exchange Commission, blasting it as "neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate, nor in the public interest." The S.E.C. and Citigroup were stunned. Expecting to see their malodorous deal wrapped up, the parties were instead directed "to be ready to try this case" the following summer.

Try a case? Was the judge kidding? A pattern had long ago been established in which mega-companies like Citigroup that were implicated in serious offenses would be let off with slaps on the wrist, by soft-touch regulators who expected judges to play ball. These officials in many cases were private sector hotshots doing temporary tours as regulators, denizens of the revolving door biding time before parachuting back into lucrative corporate defense jobs. A judge who refused to sign the settlements such folks engineered was derailing everyone’s gravy train.

Citigroup had replicated a scheme employed by numerous big banks of the era, helping construct a "born to lose" portfolio of rotten mortgage securities to be unloaded on customer-dupes, who were unaware the bank intended to bet against them. A similar case involving a Goldman, Sachs deal called "Abacus" had concluded the previous year with a hefty fine, but, infamously, no admission of wrongdoing.

In the Citigroup version, the bank earned $160 million in profits, customers lost $700 million, and the S.E.C. wanted to impose a $285 million fine. As noted by papers like the Washington Post at the time, the S.E.C.’s logic was to ask the bank to return the money ($160 million plus interest equaled $190 million) and pay a $95 million civil penalty on top.

Citigroup that quarter alone earned $3.8 billion in profits, which meant the S.E.C. proposed to charge the bank — which had been functionally bankrupt in 2008 and was booming again thanks to a massive public bailout, engineered in part by former Citi officials by the way — a fee of 2.5% of its quarterly profits. In a country where an ordinary schlub could get multiple years in prison for something like third-degree attempted theft of a car, seeking no individual penalties and asking shareholders to forego a tiny fraction of earnings as restitution for stealing $160 million was a joke.

The fine was "pocket change to any entity as large as Citigroup," noted Rakoff, in a blistering 15-page opinion. Objecting to the practice of allowing corporate crooks to walk away without admission of wrongdoing, he noted that Citigroup had already begun asserting its right to deny the allegations, both in litigation and to the media. This, he said, left the public despairing "of ever knowing the truth in a matter of obvious public importance."
Posted by Besoeker 2022-01-06 07:27|| || Front Page|| [12 views ]  Top

#1 Unless you believe the government is your friend, (today) this is actually your friend. If it is properly secured, you know what it is doing and you can add or withdraw from it in total privacy.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-01-06 07:48||   2022-01-06 07:48|| Front Page Top

#2 I wonder just how many former Citigroup employees are now at the SEC, and vice versa.
Posted by Raj 2022-01-06 12:13||   2022-01-06 12:13|| Front Page Top

#3 Will Big Pharma companies similarly get off with a slap on the wrist when it becomes publically known that their vxs harm more than help?
Posted by warthogswife 2022-01-06 12:16||   2022-01-06 12:16|| Front Page Top

#4 ^ Only takes one, if she's a partner at Citigroup's top defender, white shoe law firm Paul, Weiss

On April 22 Gensler announced that he had appointed Alex Young K. Oh to be his top Wall Street crime fighter. Reuters (and numerous other media outlets) spun the announcement like this:

“The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission today named former federal prosecutor Alex Oh as its new head of enforcement, the first woman of color to lead the division, which plays a crucial role in policing U.S. financial markets."

Alex Young K. Oh was a former federal prosecutor, but one of numerous assistant U.S. Attorneys working in the Southern District of New York more than two decades ago. What Oh has been doing for the past two decades is working as an attorney for Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, the law firm that major Wall Street banks repeatedly choose to fight their serial fraud charges.
Posted by Merrick Ferret 2022-01-06 12:23||   2022-01-06 12:23|| Front Page Top

18:26 Frank G
18:16 Frank G
17:24 Rex Mundi
16:44 irish rage boy
16:08 Sloluth Sheling6069
15:52 Super Hose
15:46 Uleremp and Company7042
15:46 Gloluth Theling6069
15:46 Super Hose
15:41 Skidmark
15:40 alanc
15:33 swksvolFF
15:32 Nero
15:29 Cured Romantic
15:19 Skidmark
15:12 Skidmark
15:09 Skidmark
14:59 ed in texas
14:55 Besoeker
14:54 ed in texas
14:51 Besoeker
14:48 Besoeker
14:07 Whiskey Mike
13:34 Cleared Cookies Lost Nic









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com