[MARKETWATCH] Americans say the American Dream is suffering — and that our laziness and low morals may be partially to blame. It's dem damn dumb white people. Da country be better off widdout dem. Vote Democrat.
Searches for “American Dream” have fallen 24% since Google began tracking this data in 2004 -- and when you type “American Dream” into Google, three of the four top autofills are “dead,” “a lie” and “leaving America,” according to an analysis of Google Trends data released Friday in a report by brokerage firm Convergex.
Furthermore, three in four Americans now say that the “American Dream” — broadly, the notion that through hard work and determination every American can have a successful life — is suffering, according to the 7th Annual American Values Survey unveiled last year at the Aspen Ideas Festival.
What’s more, 69% say the obstacles to realizing the dream are “more severe today than ever” — and note that a decline in work ethic is the primary hurdle to Dream achievement. The poll of more than 2,300 Americans was conducted by Burson-Marsteller and market research firm Penn Schoen Berland.
Posted by: Fred ||
01/24/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[7 views]
Top|| File under:
#2
A trip in the way-back machine (remember Rocky and Bullwinkle and Mr Peabody) I recall an undergrad Econ class where there was this quaint notion that wealth was only created (not transferred) by the creation of something.
We de-industrialized America and sent all those jobs overseas, and now, discover that our wealth has been squandered, the public treasury looted by grifters and witless fools, and the impoverished populace has been so poorly educated that they think the only solution is more tyrannical government power. I cannot see a path back that isn't terrible to consider, and the importation of a million new immigrants each year demanding largesse from Washington is compounding any fix.
#5
Spot on comment NoMoreBS! I think that we people with vision and drive will make our own good news. But the parasites of hard workers who live off the bounty of the land and mind are not welcome. Everyone contributes what they have. We are going through a real crisis in our country and the world. It will not be the same. We will work for a better country but we will not do everybody's work for them.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
01/24/2016 14:43 Comments ||
Top||
#7
The "American Dream" of our parents and grandparents, etal. older generations has devol into the "Amerikan Dream" andor "North American/Amerikan Dream" under US-led Anti-US OWG-NWO NAU + Globalism.
WE'RE ALL MEXICANS, CANADIANS = MACKENZIANS, + GREENLANDERS NOW, IFF ONLY PRO FORMA, + WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT, WANT IT OR NOT.
Can Amerika still be a POTENT OR EFFECTIVE SUPERPOWER = CO-SUPERPOWER alongside Russia, China, + Iran, Other? IFF IT UNILATERALLY VOLUNTARILY PULLS BACK AROUND THE WORLD + GIVES UP 1/2 OF THE PACIFIC, + 1/2 OF THE ATLANTIC, ETC. IN THE NAME OF OWG-NWO/GLOBAL GOVT. + GLOBAL MARXIST-COMMIE-SOCIALIST ORDER???
* E.G. BRITAIN = ORDINARY BRITS HAVE LOST MUCH OF THEIR NATURAL, PERSONAL FREEDOMS + PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS TO THE COUNTRY'S MASSIVE, STIL-EXPANDING WELFARE-NANNY STATE, + MANY IN THE BRIT ARMED FORCES + GOVT. DOUBT THE MILITARY'S ABILITY TO EFFEC DEFEND WID CONVENTIONAL FORCES JUST THE ENGLISH CHANNEL + LITTORALS.
True, the UK still has a TRIDENT SLBM force, but you don't use Trident Nukes to fight any domestic Islamist-Jihadist threat, or even overseas.
Iff the UK is planning to rely on the US to help in its National or Geopol Security, HOW WILL THAT WORK IFF AMERIKA ITSELF IS UNDER INCREASING ISLAMIST-JIHADI DOMESTIC THREAT + ELECTS ANTI-US US POLITICOS TO BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE???
Iff it means more Anti-Electoral, Regulatory Socialism + B[iggest] Govt. in the US, THE LEFTIES + ALIGNED WOULD RATHER LEAVE THE BORDERS UNSECURE EVEN IT MEANS RISKING 000'S, 0,000'D, OR MILYUHNS OF JIHADIS SNEAKING INTO THE COUNTRY.
Lest we fergit, there's no substantive evidence the Lefties can control the domestic Jihad inside Amerika even iff Secular Marxism-Socialism is successfully imposed on the country.
#2
Gun grabber, nanny state dickhead - if he runs as a Dem, I'm guessing he pulls votes from Bernie. If he runs as a 'Pub, he'll get the Jeb! / Kasich votes.
#3
Whoops - 'independent' bid (riiight) - see above, but he'd pull more Bernie votes than anything else. I don't think he'll have any serious impact overall.
Posted by: Barbara ||
01/24/2016 14:30 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Trump on the mid-left and Bloomie on the far-far-left? That makes Hilarity the "centrist"...
Posted by: Steve White ||
01/24/2016 14:30 Comments ||
Top||
#10
We need another billionaire megalomaniac like a moose needs a hat rack.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
01/24/2016 14:46 Comments ||
Top||
#11
Think of it as an efficient way to get more money out of passive investments to circulate through the economy, as those who sponsored Jeb, etc.to the tune of multiple millions have already done. So much better than the government priming the pump with borrowed money in a semi-Keynesian frenzy, it seems to me.
On the other hand, Mrs. Clinton told him today he needn't bother, as this is her row to hoe.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
