Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/09/2019 View Fri 02/08/2019 View Thu 02/07/2019 View Wed 02/06/2019 View Tue 02/05/2019 View Mon 02/04/2019 View Sun 02/03/2019
1
2019-02-09 Government
John Roberts picks up slack for absent RBG, votes to BLOCK Louisiana abortion law
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-02-09 01:39|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 Mark Levin says Roberts is a disgrace:

A 'disgrace' yes. A surprise? Hardly.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-02-09 01:44||   2019-02-09 01:44|| Front Page Top

#2 Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined the court’s four liberals in putting a hold on the law, pending a full review of the case.

Not exactly "BLOCK". "Delayed" would be more accurate
Posted by Frank G 2019-02-09 06:31||   2019-02-09 06:31|| Front Page Top

#3 Yes, and I can see him doing an RBG just as an intentional balance so that it CAN get before the SC. He delayed it, but didn't block it, just as Frank G. said.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2019-02-09 08:17||   2019-02-09 08:17|| Front Page Top

#4 The overturned milk truck "blocked" traffic causing many motorists a delay.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-02-09 08:22||   2019-02-09 08:22|| Front Page Top

#5 John Roberts has been a disgrace, but not a particularly surprising one, for most of his career. Only fools keep getting surprised by a useful idiot continuing his ways.
Posted by Vernal Hatrack2366 2019-02-09 08:45||   2019-02-09 08:45|| Front Page Top

#6 I think we can all agree now that W's legacy is officially shit.
Posted by DarthVader 2019-02-09 08:56||   2019-02-09 08:56|| Front Page Top

#7 I think we can all agree now that W's legacy is officially shit.

The Roberts appointment certainly hasn't turned out to be a high point.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-02-09 09:02||   2019-02-09 09:02|| Front Page Top

#8 I believe someone has some dirt on Roberts and at certain times when a vote comes up .. has influence on his decision.
Posted by Omomons de Medici2118 2019-02-09 09:38||   2019-02-09 09:38|| Front Page Top

#9 I believe someone has some dirt on Roberts and at certain times when a vote comes up .. has influence on his decision.

Yes, strange his obvious transformation. Very strange. Life-time appointment should go the way of the Studebaker.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-02-09 09:42||   2019-02-09 09:42|| Front Page Top

#10 #6 I think we can all agree now that W's legacy is officially shit.

The Bush family.The gits that keep on grifting.


#8 I believe someone has some dirt on Roberts and at certain times when a vote comes up .. has influence on his decision.

I'm thinking there' needs to be a GoFundme (or non-pozzed equivalent) to hire investigators to dig into Roberts (and a lot of other judges, besides)
Posted by charger 2019-02-09 12:13||   2019-02-09 12:13|| Front Page Top

#11 So he does not understand the Right to Life, and he is a Justice?
Posted by newc 2019-02-09 12:19||   2019-02-09 12:19|| Front Page Top

#12 #11 He understands; he just doesn't care.

When it comes to the Ruling Class, never ascribe to ignorance that which could be rooted in malice.
Posted by charger 2019-02-09 12:56||   2019-02-09 12:56|| Front Page Top

#13 I don't know but I'm guessing the purpose of this law is so if something goes wrong with the abortion the abortionist can have the victim admitted to hospital. What happens if he can't? Delays could be disastrous.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-02-09 14:14||   2019-02-09 14:14|| Front Page Top

#14 RBG did vote. No one needed to pick up the slack.

This was a procedural vote, not a final disposition of the case.

And the LA law clearly runs afoul of a 2016 SCOTUS ruling. If the court is going to reconsider after just 3 years, I'm not against dotting the i's and crossing the t's.
Posted by Iblis 2019-02-09 14:46||   2019-02-09 14:46|| Front Page Top

#15 O dM2118 may be right. The Bezos flap suggests to me that quite a few people have access to surprising details about other people's lives.

I suspect that the big data trawling won't find a lot of terrorists, but the same data might be very useful for drilling down on particular people's details.
Posted by james  2019-02-09 14:58|| http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com  2019-02-09 14:58|| Front Page Top

21:45 Vespasian Unairt7733
21:43 Vespasian Unairt7733
21:08 SteveS
21:02 Gremble Glineter3722
20:48 Bunyip
20:37 lord garth
20:05 trailing wife
20:04 trailing wife
19:59 trailing wife
19:37 Lampedusa Claper2037
18:54 Anguper Hupomosing9418
18:51 49 Pan
18:30 Besoeker
18:06 Neville Dark Lord of the Wee Folk7365
17:48 Lampedusa Claper2037
17:46 gorb
16:56 Anomolous Sources
16:22 Glusotle Sninetle1364
16:20 Bright Pebbles
16:17 Glusotle Sninetle1364
16:17 Rob Crawford
16:13 Glusotle Sninetle1364
16:12 Bright Pebbles
16:04 Bright Pebbles









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com