Article

2004-06-18 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2004-06-18 4:53:20 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 So when the commission finds, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al-Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States,"..

Wasn't this "commission" formed with the intent to investigate the local and national governmental crisis response to the 2001 attacks, identify shortcomings, and evaluate preparedness for possible future events? If so, why should they even give a rat's ass about whether there was Iraq/Al-Qaida cooperation? Would the outcome of the attacks really have been any different otherwise?

If there ever was any evidence that this commission is a colossal waste of time, this irrelevant "finding" of non-cooperation between Hussein and Al-Qaida has to be it.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-06-18 1:20:31 PM|| 2004-06-18 1:20:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 National Review had an excellent analysis on the report - June 17.

Posted by jawa 2004-06-18 7:01:24 PM|| 2004-06-18 7:01:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 National Review Online had an excellent analysis on the report - June 17.

Posted by jawa 2004-06-18 7:01:49 PM|| 2004-06-18 7:01:49 PM|| Front Page Top

20:11 Frank G
19:25 Anonymous5497
13:43 Sammy Frobisher
09:23 Anonymous5308
19:44 The Doctor
19:37 Sammy Frobisher(AKA Ano.5290)
19:27 Anonymous5305
18:55 Anonymouse
18:22 Anonymous5303
18:04 Anonymouse
22:01 Anonymous5291
16:22 Robert Crawford
15:28 Anonymous5290
08:14 Howard UK
04:52 .com
04:34 Anonymous4617
04:21 .com
04:06 Anonymous4617
03:54 .com
03:21 Anonymous4617
03:12 .com
03:05 Anonymous4617
03:04 .com
02:52 .com