Article

2004-10-29 Home Front: Politix

Things Get Ugly At Early Voting Locations

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-10-29 1:24:16 PM|| || Front Page|| [9 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1
Outside the Miami-Dade Government Center, Democratic demonstrators tried to shout-down Republican party officials and legislators who had called a news conference to make allegations of voter fraud and voter intimidation by supporters of Sen. John Kerry.

Would it have bothered the reporter to note that the attempt to "shout down" someone proves the allegation?

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-10-29 1:27:31 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/] 2004-10-29 1:27:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 But only Republicians can imtimidate voters. Just as only white people can be racist and only white males can be slaveowners and oppressors.

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-10-29 1:31:44 PM|| 2004-10-29 1:31:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 I keep forgetting those rules. Sorry.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-10-29 1:38:18 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/] 2004-10-29 1:38:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Back to PC Re-education camp for you, RC!

Posted by Dar 2004-10-29 2:16:03 PM|| 2004-10-29 2:16:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 CF - actually I think the RCW says you can't electioneer within 300 feet of the entrance to a polling place. But, I guess I'm just splitting hairs.

But can a private conversation be considered electioneering? dunno. Guess that depends on if you're actually there to vote or not. Two voters having a private conversation sure is different than one voter being talked to by someone who is there for reasons (any reasons) other than to vote.

Posted by spiffo 2004-10-29 3:23:53 PM|| 2004-10-29 3:23:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Colorado its 100 feet.

Posted by OldSpook 2004-10-29 3:33:47 PM|| 2004-10-29 3:33:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Yes, I would say that a "private conversation" should be considered electioneering. Anything involving speech within the legal bounds involving advocacy constitutes electioneering, as far as I can tell. Weâve been told not even to have non-political speech with the judges of election within the precinct, on the grounds that itâs excessively chummy, and might give someone in line the impression of bias.

I don't think that you even need to be talking to someone - if some Democrat paid Benny Lunkin, our local paranoid schizophrenic, $50 to debate the voices in his head on the merits of John Kerry while within my poll precinct, I'd by damn call that "electioneering".

Posted by Mitch H. 2004-10-29 3:35:31 PM|| [http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/] 2004-10-29 3:35:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Mitch - last time I voted in person, been doing absentee for a long time, no political conversations were tolerated in line. I don't recall the distance in Texas - 90-100 ft sounds about right, but not sure. Anyway, I DO recall an Election Judge (tipped by a Poll Watcher - they have no actual authority) coming out to the line and warning a man to limit his remarks to topics other than the election. And that was a very mild election year - Carter vs Ford. It was all very civil and polite.

Today - with this election? Lol! Civility has already been gunned down. It was right behind truth in the firing line.

Posted by .com 2004-10-29 3:46:07 PM|| 2004-10-29 3:46:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 300ft sounds about righ too. I remember in elementary school being told that we were not to take any 'vote yes! schools!' signs near the polling place.

This year perhaps we should arrive at the polling place armed to the teeth.

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-10-29 4:06:58 PM|| 2004-10-29 4:06:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 This year perhaps we should arrive at the polling place armed to the teeth.

I don't go anywhere unarmed, anymore ; }

Posted by spiffo 2004-10-29 4:25:50 PM|| 2004-10-29 4:25:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 spiffo - Even with a concealed carry permit, it's not allowed in Texas, bro. Guns mixed with elections are waay in the past, heh. Don't want to see you hustled off to jail before you vote, lol!

Posted by .com 2004-10-29 4:35:04 PM|| 2004-10-29 4:35:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 I'm in Washington State and possess a CPL. There is no law here against lawful concealed carry in a polling place. RCW 9.41.300 outlines prohibited carry locations.

From WA State Constitution:

SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.

Posted by spiffo 2004-10-29 5:13:33 PM|| 2004-10-29 5:13:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 WA - The Lefty Left Coast? Whoa, you DO need to be armed, lol! And I'm glad to see the law doesn't stifle your 2nd Amendment right. I guess there were a few elections in Texas that went "wrong" with armed voters, heh.

BTW, General Lucky is up your way - you guys should get acquainted.

Posted by .com 2004-10-29 5:18:28 PM|| 2004-10-29 5:18:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 WA law is pretty specific about where you can't carry. Drinking establishments, primary or secondary schools, and federal and state law offices and government buildings are pretty much out. For some reason that seems to include municipal libraries as well. :)
Polling places are wide open--with a CCP.

.com's right. We need all the backup we can get over here on the Left coast.

Posted by Asedwich 2004-10-30 1:23:27 AM|| 2004-10-30 1:23:27 AM|| Front Page Top