Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 11/03/2004 View Tue 11/02/2004 View Mon 11/01/2004 View Sun 10/31/2004 View Sat 10/30/2004 View Fri 10/29/2004 View Thu 10/28/2004
1
2004-11-03 Home Front: Politix
Kristof to NYT Readers: Dems Need to Reposition Themselves With the Little People
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife 2004-11-03 12:43:02 PM|| || Front Page|| [5 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Forgive us, Nick. We know not what we do...
Posted by tu3031 2004-11-03 1:30:52 PM||   2004-11-03 1:30:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 ...many of those people disdain Democrats as elitists who empathize with spotted owls rather than loggers.

Let's see your sole means of support vaporize because of obsessive eco-worry about a flying rat and see how you like it, Nick.
Posted by mojo  2004-11-03 1:41:13 PM||   2004-11-03 1:41:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 They still don't get the tax cut thing.

Most Americans don't object to tax cut for those in higher income brackets because the American dream is to propel oneself into that very same bracket.

Americans for the most part are a people of ambition not envy.
Posted by Dreadnought 2004-11-03 2:16:13 PM||   2004-11-03 2:16:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Today's Democrats:

This democracy thing would work great if you didn't have to deal with all of those people.
Posted by 2b 2004-11-03 2:21:35 PM||   2004-11-03 2:21:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 This ass-clown proves that they just don't get it.
Posted by Crikey 2004-11-03 2:38:21 PM||   2004-11-03 2:38:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Those stupid Red Staters. We could help them if only they would let us!
Posted by Secret Master 2004-11-03 2:45:09 PM||   2004-11-03 2:45:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Maybe if the Democrats would back off from their obviously nonsensical redistributionist ideas and class warfare diatribes they could re-take their place as a party of loyal opposition... instead of the party of Stalinist welfare theives.
Posted by Leigh 2004-11-03 3:04:11 PM||   2004-11-03 3:04:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Don't these clueless LLL types realize that when they're trying to be "gracious" is when they're at their most loathsome?
Posted by Xbalanke  2004-11-03 4:53:41 PM||   2004-11-03 4:53:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Arguements that try to convince people to join your side is always helped by opening with "You idiots"
Posted by Laurence of the Rats  2004-11-03 5:19:14 PM|| [http://www.punictreachery.com/]  2004-11-03 5:19:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 The whole attitude this elitist asshole spews is part of what pisses me off about the DNC. Their utter 'disdain' for 'middle america' (or 'flyover-country' america). As if middle america (thats 'farmers, factory workers, and waitresses') needs to be guided and herded along like sheep or cows to where the food is or where the shelter is.

And you hear this crap all over these days.
Posted by CrazyFool  2004-11-03 5:31:46 PM||   2004-11-03 5:31:46 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 The libs lost again and still haven't figured it out. I suspect you could hit them with a fusion powered Clue-bat and they still wouldn't get it.
Posted by A Jackson 2004-11-03 9:24:01 PM||   2004-11-03 9:24:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 The party of Pelosi and Kennedy and Maria Tereza's BoyToy is crippled above all by its condescending, sneering attitude toward religion and the military culture. This problem cannot be remedied without a wholesale change in leadership, because if you don't understand intuitively the concepts of faith, loyalty, duty, and honor, no one can explain them to you.

It goes without saying-- though I;ve been saying this ad nauseam for four years-- that the Dems need to get serious, and hawkish, about national security. But on the domestic front, the Party of the Working Man is also screwed, at least with their present platform and leadership.

Suppose they try to get religion and go hard populist a la Huey Long, Tom Watson and other classic southern class warriors. They may well pick up some of Rove's four million sidelined evangelicals, but they will certainly lose at least that number of middle-class suburbanites and exurbanites. It is precisely these educated, white-collar professionals who are most suspicious of government intervention and who account for most of the recent migrants to the rapid growth states in the sunbelt and the rapid growth exurbs outside Chicago, Dallas, etc.

IMHO the Dems cannot win the "values" debate with a bicoastal pro-gay, aging feminist elite. Instead, they should make the most of their social liberalism ad combine it with economic libertarianism. Attack Bush hard on his coziness with corporate welfare recipients. Attack the scandalous protection of the BabyBells under Michael Powell's FCC. Make Eliot Spitzer the poster child for your attitude toward Wall Street.

And combine this with a radical approach to solving the health care mess: mandatory insurance required of every individual, along with caps on punitive damages in malpractice suits and limited access to vanity procedures and most elective surgeries. These changes would lower rates across the board and make health insurance affordable. They should play the health care card, and hard, because it's a national problem that causes grief to everyone, from auto executives to small business owners to contractors and workingmen.

Finally, they need to get serious about winning in the high growth states. Pretty soon, Texas and Florida each will have more votes than New York. COlorado will have more electoral votes than Wisconsin, and Arizona, NM and Nevada more votes each than Iowa. Libertarian + laser-like focus on solving he health insurance mess is a winning formula in these states.

Screw Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio and the aging, shrinking rustbelt. Whoever gets the allegiance of the sunbelt yuppies and small businesspeople + the active and ex-military + hispanics will have a lock on the states that are growing fastest and that will set this nation's domestic agenda in this century.
Posted by lex 2004-11-03 11:16:08 PM||   2004-11-03 11:16:08 PM|| Front Page Top

01:01 Choling Cheling4599
00:55 Zenster
00:05 RWV
23:58 RWV
23:58 PBMcL
23:56 cingold
23:55 Fred
23:55 Mark Espinola
23:54 RWV
23:51 RWV
23:36 lex
23:31 lex
23:27 lex
23:21 Phil Fraering
23:17 Ol_Dirty_American
23:16 lex
23:07 bill
23:07 Uschi
23:04 Atomic Conspiracy
23:01 Atomic Conspiracy
22:53 Rafael
22:46 CrazyFool
22:40 Seafarious
22:39 Bomb-a-rama









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com