Article

2004-11-18 Home Front: Tech

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2004-11-18 1:10:35 PM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Hold on a sec... you mean McCain was freezing promotions of people unrelated to the tanker deal in order to protest the tanker deal?

Posted by Phil Fraering 2004-11-18 1:32:53 PM|| [http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com] 2004-11-18 1:32:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Yup, no promotions and no replacements for those old KC-135's either. I'm thinking nothing is going to be done till one of them snaps a wingspar on takeoff and flops onto a shopping mall. That might get McCain's attention.

Posted by Steve 2004-11-18 2:47:39 PM|| 2004-11-18 2:47:39 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Heyyyyy! Wasn't Linda Daschle the Boeing lobbyist for this deal?

Posted by Frank G 2004-11-18 2:58:57 PM|| 2004-11-18 2:58:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 When the Navy stonewalled Tailgate, they held up promotions for the service. Guys, this is the power of Congress under Article 1 of the Constitution. This is a legacy of the English Civil War which still echoed with the founding fathers. The Pres may be the commander in chief, but the legislative body maintains control over the purse and personnel management issues like overall pay, size and rank composition.

Posted by Don 2004-11-18 3:07:37 PM|| 2004-11-18 3:07:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 I worked with Dr. Sambur in a previous life. He is a basically decent man, very intelligent but a little naive. I seriously doubt that he personally had anything to do with the hanky-panky involved in the Boeing deal, but since it happened on his watch, he gets to walk the plank.

Posted by RWV 2004-11-18 4:05:12 PM|| 2004-11-18 4:05:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 It's where the phrase "An Officer and a Gentleman, by order of Congress" comes from, too.

Posted by mojo 2004-11-18 4:09:14 PM|| 2004-11-18 4:09:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 McCain, an Arizona Republican, has blocked a range of promotions over the Air Force push to acquire 100 KC-767 aerial tankers, an idea he denounced as a government handout to Chicago-based Boeing...

The basic question is, do we need these or not? If we need them, then buy them. I don't understand what this government-handout-to-Boeing crap is; it's not like the 767 is a concept aircraft and hasn't been produced yet. And what's the deal with EADS? What do they have to do with this?

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-11-18 4:13:13 PM|| 2004-11-18 4:13:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 I am impressed by Mr. Sambur's selfless act on behalf of the country that is probably approrpiate if he did screw up or was responsible for one. Nonetheless, it is too infrequently that we see people accept responsibility forthrightly for their errors these days. He is at least to be saluted for that forthrightnes.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-11-18 4:15:58 PM|| 2004-11-18 4:15:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 McCain has a freaking screw loose. He's had a hard-on over this Boeing deal for months. Now that he has screwed up elections, it's time for the military acquisitions to feel his wrath.

Posted by Capt America 2004-11-18 7:53:06 PM|| 2004-11-18 7:53:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 B-a-r - I think the basic question is, "Do we need McCain or not?" He seems to have a square splintery broomstick shoved up his ass.

Posted by .com 2004-11-18 7:57:43 PM|| 2004-11-18 7:57:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Captain America, this "Boeing Deal" would have a blatant rip-off of the taxpayers. The concept was hatched as a way to replace the seriously aging fleet of VietNam era KC-135 tankers without having to convince Congress to pony up the cash to buy new ones. In principle, it wasn't a bad idea. In practice, by the time the lobbyists got through with it, it was a scheme worthy of the Rent-to-Own electronics shops. It would have eventually cost the taxpayers about twice what it would have to have bought the planes outright. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21044-2004Oct9_2.html The scandal comes in because Darleen Drunyon was negotiating for a job with Boeing while she was negotiating the tanker deal for the AF. On Oct. 1, Druyun was sentenced to nine months in prison after admitting that she inflated the price of the deal as a "parting gift" before her Pentagon retirement to ingratiate herself with Boeing.

Posted by RWV 2004-11-18 11:39:25 PM|| 2004-11-18 11:39:25 PM|| Front Page Top

00:00 BigEd
23:58 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:56 BigEd
23:52 BigEd
23:46 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:43 BigEd
23:42 CrazyFool
23:39 RWV
23:37 Don
23:34 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:30 BigEd
23:29 CornÃ®liÃ«s
23:28 CornÃ®liÃ«s
23:27 BigEd
23:27 CornÃ®liÃ«s
23:24 Jarhead
23:23 Jarhead
23:21 RWV
23:15 Mark Espinola
23:09 PBMcL
23:08 phil_b
23:05 BigEd
23:04 Carl in N.H.
23:00 Bomb-a-rama