Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 12/22/2004 View Tue 12/21/2004 View Mon 12/20/2004 View Sun 12/19/2004 View Sat 12/18/2004 View Fri 12/17/2004 View Thu 12/16/2004
1
2004-12-22 Africa: North
Libya's Disarmed Forces
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2004-12-22 9:50:26 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Syrian forces given a border would over run Libya in 10 days.
Posted by Shipman 2004-12-22 12:17:22 PM||   2004-12-22 12:17:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Also explains why Libyan forces had extremely poor (to put it mildly) performance in Chad.
Posted by Pappy 2004-12-22 3:57:42 PM||   2004-12-22 3:57:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 This may not be such a bad thing, and should be encouraged elsewhere. The Cold War created an unfortunate belief among third and fourth world nations that they actually *needed* a serious army. Dozens of little spats started to parody the great arms race, a terribly expensive waste of resources. So, except for arms manufacturers, who really needs or wants a heavily militarized Libya, Costa Rica, Paraguay or Mozambique? In fact, if you look at the Middle East, what countries really *need* an offensive army? What countries really need a world-class defense?
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-12-22 7:26:04 PM||   2004-12-22 7:26:04 PM|| Front Page Top

00:03 Pappy
23:47 Pappy
23:42 Rafael
23:12 Frank G
23:03 jn1
22:56 Stephen
22:56 Frank G
22:48 badanov
22:29 Atomic Conspiracy
22:14 badanov
22:12 Zhang Fei
21:26 Phil Fraering
21:07 True German Ally
20:43 Mark Z.
20:42 Silentbrick
20:22 Anonymous4724
20:16 Barbara Skolaut
20:09 Barbara Skolaut
20:03 Barbara Skolaut
19:51 Bomb-a-rama
19:42 Bomb-a-rama
19:28 Bomb-a-rama
19:27 Radio Guy
19:26 Radio Guy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com