Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 06/14/2005 View Mon 06/13/2005 View Sun 06/12/2005 View Sat 06/11/2005 View Fri 06/10/2005 View Thu 06/09/2005 View Wed 06/08/2005
1
2005-06-14 Iraq-Jordan
Combat Commanders In Charge
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-06-14 09:18|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 This is a very good sign. I am reminded of how the military was a superb peacemaking force after the Indian Wars, post Civil War. Their reports of the time show them to be skilled negotiators, involved in inter- and intra-tribal disputes, Indian and settler disputes, and Indian and military disputes. One of their more effective tools was hiring many "braves" not just as liasons, but as scouts "blueshirts", and eventually soldiers. All too soon, full blooded Indians were being trained as Reserve Officers.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-06-14 11:35||   2005-06-14 11:35|| Front Page Top

#2 Anonymoose, this was bad why? ("full blooded Indians were being trained as Reserve Officers")

And this is good news! A heckuva lot more of the world is in the stages of warlordism than we'd like to admit, so I agree that this is a good improvement. Ever hear of "battationcommandersonline.mil"? ;) (It's the name of a StrategyPage article about the rise of battalions as the smallest, yet vital strategic unit.)

Reminds me of how the Special Forces do things back in Afghanistan ...
Posted by Edward Yee">Edward Yee  2005-06-14 13:25|| http://edwardyee.fanworks.net]">[http://edwardyee.fanworks.net]  2005-06-14 13:25|| Front Page Top

#3 "One of the reasons our occupation of Japan went so well was that Gen Douglas MacArther filled the role of Emperor"

the other reason is that the New Deal bureaucrats who actually ran the occupation pretty much ignored MacArthur, IIUC. although that was pretty close to the old Japanese system too.
Posted by liberalhawk 2005-06-14 13:49||   2005-06-14 13:49|| Front Page Top

#4 Sheesh, Lh, methinks you understand incorrectly, and I won't insinuate you'd make shit up to support your thoughts, nay, but that only took 15 seconds to disprove. There are hundreds of links, of course, but one that particularly grabbed my attention did so because it was first-hand knowledge. Y'know, someone who was actually there, on the scene, knew the players, etc? I know first-hand experience is something you've derided in the past, but I found it rather more compelling than your dismissive forty-eighth-hand view.

JRPI - Japan Policy Research Institute:
"Writing a new Constitution was supposed to have been undertaken by the Japanese themselves. However, as is well known, this aspect of Japan’s “regime change” became GovSec’s most impressive and lasting achievement. Although it was written during one tumultuous week in February, 1946, some seven months before I arrived, work on it continued because debates in the House of Peers resulted in certain amendments, as well as because of some difficulties in the Japanese translation of the document itself. Two factors played an important role in convincing MacArthur to ignore the Far Eastern Advisory Commission’s (FEAC) [your New Deal Doods] purely hortatory edict that any constitutional change needed its imprimatur. [Sound like typical bureaucratic power gamers, no?] First, all of the Japanese drafts amending the existing Constitution were deemed to be badly flawed and insufficient. Second, the FEAC was going to be replaced by the FEC—the Far Eastern Commission—which was intended to project a greater international voice in supervising Occupation policy. SCAP was most concerned that possible Soviet intervention might threaten its goal of the new Constitution’s early completion."

Not only was it the case that the New Deal Bureaucrats were the ones ignored, especially in the single-most important aspect of the occupation, but they were summarily sideline by the guy you imply was a mere figurehead. Sheesh, who'da thunk it, eh?
Posted by .com 2005-06-14 15:14||   2005-06-14 15:14|| Front Page Top

#5 a translator on Mac's staff gives credit to Mac. Big surprise.
Posted by liberalhawk 2005-06-14 15:20||   2005-06-14 15:20|| Front Page Top

#6 "any of the most interesting parts of the book discuss how, after the early punitive phase of the Occupation, the reform process was a collaborative one in which progressive Japanese academics and civil servants worked closely with New Deal Americans to revolutionize thinking on such issues as women’s rights, in the face of resistance from the defenders of the Old Order often with surprising results. In October 1947, for example, Japanese legislators abolished the crime of adultery when SCAP insisted that the law, which had previously only applied to women, be enforced for men as well. "
Posted by liberalhawk 2005-06-14 15:25||   2005-06-14 15:25|| Front Page Top

#7 Re #5 - Dismissing him proves dick. He was there, you weren't. I'll take his account, thanks.

Re #6 - You didn't cite your source. Authoritative, is it?

You might find this Sgt Stryker post interesting. Somehow I don't think he shares your view.
Posted by .com 2005-06-14 15:33||   2005-06-14 15:33|| Front Page Top

#8 whatever. Like I said, IIUC.

Ok, mac had more influence than a figurehead emperor. The new dealers had much influence as well. Certainly this was NOT an occupation primarily of military folks.

BTW, my dad was there. Very briefly, before his ship went back to California.
Posted by liberalhawk 2005-06-14 15:37||   2005-06-14 15:37|| Front Page Top

#9 Hey, you've got your hands full, today, defending All Things Liberal. So it's no biggie, you just posted a common, though incorrect, off-hand brain fart remark.

Mac was anything but perfect, as are all of us, but he knew the Japanese very well and was no figurehead. Hell, even PBS acknowledges it.

So go fight the good fight on those other fronts. It's cool.
Posted by .com 2005-06-14 15:38||   2005-06-14 15:38|| Front Page Top

#10 "Bureaucrats to the ramparts!"


LH - you're biting today
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-06-14 15:40||   2005-06-14 15:40|| Front Page Top

#11 "BTW, my dad was there."

My kind of guy. A (now deceased) friend of mine was there, as well. His name was Dr Richard Johnson. He served on the economics team (of Mac's staff) that helped rebuild them into an economic powerhouse. Dr Johnson went on to become a major player in the US banking industry, founding the Southwestern Graduate School of Banking, SWGSB - "swigsbee" to most of the bankers in America. He told me that "emperor" Mac was a very quick study and usually pointed out the hows to them when they were working with their Japanese counterparts - how to communicate with them to make sure they understood the reasons behind the reforms, because then they would enthusiastically implement them. Apparently, he was more detail oriented than his legend implies, and definitely more involved than the revisionists have asserted. FWIW.
Posted by .com 2005-06-14 15:49||   2005-06-14 15:49|| Front Page Top

23:51 Captain America
23:19 eLarson
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:13 3dc
23:05 2b
23:00 3dc
22:55 mom
22:01 ed
22:00 an dalusian dog
21:41 badanov
21:35 Hank
21:26 Bobby
21:07 Spot
21:03 Atomic Conspiracy
20:59 mojo
20:51 Shairong Sninter4063
20:42 Bomb-a-rama
20:42 Zhang Fei
20:34 Bomb-a-rama
20:28 Frank G
20:26 OldSpook
20:25 .com
20:19 Tom
20:18 Apache









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com