Article

2005-08-14 Iraq-Jordan

Bush slaps down top general who called for withdrawal

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by DanNY 2005-08-14 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 bad link

Posted by GK 2005-08-14 00:04|| 2005-08-14 00:04|| Front Page Top

#2 Here's the right link.

Posted by 11A5S 2005-08-14 00:13|| 2005-08-14 00:13|| Front Page Top

#3 after he briefed that troop levels - now 138,000 - could be reduced by 30,000 in the early months of next year as Iraqi security forces take on a greater role.

And this translates into "calls for troops to be pulled out of Iraq". Nice try.

Posted by Rafael 2005-08-14 00:20|| 2005-08-14 00:20|| Front Page Top

#4 The article itself does not say the general called for anything. The article was mischaracterized by the headline, which probably was written by someone else.
.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2005-08-14 00:48|| 2005-08-14 00:48|| Front Page Top

#5 That's right, and it was done intentionally.

Posted by Rafael 2005-08-14 00:50|| 2005-08-14 00:50|| Front Page Top

#6 General Casey discussed these numbers at a Senate Armed Forces Committee hearing in July, covered by CSPAN.

I frankly don't see what the hubbub is about, other than its August and everyone is out of Washington DC right now on vacation.

Incidentially, I don't hear anyone complaining about senators and congressmen being out on vaca for five weeks.

Posted by Captain America 2005-08-14 02:09|| 2005-08-14 02:09|| Front Page Top

#7 President George W Bush personally intervened last week to play down as "speculation" all talk of troop pull-outs because he fears that even discussing options for an "exit strategy" implies weakening resolve.

Actually, "discussing options for an 'exit strategy'" will be INTERPRETED as weakening resolve.

I am SURE that a lot of rational courses and necessary discussion are not being done because the Liberals, Democraps, and the Media are deliberately politicizing the issue. We have troops fighting over burnt out hulks that our ancestors would have abandoned SOLELY because the aforementioned Terrible Three insist on broadcasting images of gun-waving jihadis sitting on said wreckage in close-up shots calculated to exclude the dead bodies of their comrades about said junk-heap.

Posted by Ptah">Ptah 2005-08-14 06:22|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org] 2005-08-14 06:22|| Front Page Top

#8 The top American commander in Iraq has been privately rebuked by the Bush administration for openly discussing plans to reduce troop levels there next year

No E-Ring office for you.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2005-08-14 09:35|| 2005-08-14 09:35|| Front Page Top

#9 I frankly don't see what the hubbub is about

It's about politics. In the 2006 Congressional elections Bush's strategy (or lack thereof) will be presented as a failure; "Why haven't you reduced forces in Iraq as you had planned?" There's still too many Clinton Generals in the military and this guy looks to be one of them. He should have been filtered out sooner.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-08-14 09:48|| 2005-08-14 09:48|| Front Page Top

#10 Mrs. D -- obviously this is for politics. My comment pertained to the lack of substance behind the political vitriol.

As for the notion that discussing exit strategies portrays a lack of resolve.

The discussion of exit strategies at this time puts needed pressure on those drafting the Iraq constitution. Moreover, the administration has been quite overt in conditioning any discussion of numbers and mileposts with the phrase "depends on the conditions on the ground".

Posted by Captain America 2005-08-14 10:38|| 2005-08-14 10:38|| Front Page Top

#11 I doubt the route for maximum pressure on Iraqi constitution makers runs through the comments to the NYT.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-08-14 11:31|| 2005-08-14 11:31|| Front Page Top

#12 Mrs D --

Plz, you minimuize the argument. The NY Slimes is not the only publication that has taken liberties with General Casey's assessment on troop draw down. Moreover, this month the general made his comments while in Iraq.

The point being that when General Casey testified in public to the Senate committee in July, and stated his estimated drawdown (complete with caveats), there was precious little notice.

When the general restated his estimates (again, complete with caveats), the MSM here have turned the story into a major battle between President Bush and General Casey. August is a painfully slow month for the MSM in Washington, and the antiwar push is the cause de jour.

Posted by Captain America 2005-08-14 14:42|| 2005-08-14 14:42|| Front Page Top

23:51 Snoth Glavise7365
23:42 Redneck Jim
23:11 Uleregum Hupains2323
23:07 Uleregum Hupains2323
23:01 Captain America
22:55 Captain America
22:53 JosephMendiola
22:50 Red Dog
22:49 .com
22:45 Frank G
22:44 OldSpook
22:42 Frank G
22:32 xbalanke
22:24 Frank G
22:17 Sock Puppet 0â Doom
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:15 Nelson Muntz
22:14 gromgoru
22:10 2b
22:10 gromgoru
22:09 muck4doo
22:03 2b
21:57 trailing wife
21:56 Bobby