Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 12/11/2006 View Sun 12/10/2006 View Sat 12/09/2006 View Fri 12/08/2006 View Thu 12/07/2006 View Wed 12/06/2006 View Tue 12/05/2006
1
2006-12-11 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Debka: Gates Testimony Means Israel Must Use Nukes To Defend Itself
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-12-11 18:16|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 If Debka is right, this could mean that the US has decided to give up on the Arab world and Iran, and once we leave the place, letting the Israelis annihilate them.

Well, it boils down to this: how many American lives is it worth to keep them from destroying themselves?

Once we leave Iraq, and if a democrat is elected President, no US soldier will want to remain there, it will be another decade before we will have any inclination to involve ourselves with any overseas adventure.

So what will be the price? Tehran, Damascus, Qom, maybe part of Lebanon, maybe Cairo, Mecca, Medina, Riyadh, Tripoli, Amman, who knows? They might just choose the top 200 Moslem cities in the world.
Posted by Anonymoose 2006-12-11 18:32||   2006-12-11 18:32|| Front Page Top

#2 Test
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-12-11 18:45||   2006-12-11 18:45|| Front Page Top

#3 Pass / Fail?
Posted by .com 2006-12-11 18:46||   2006-12-11 18:46|| Front Page Top

#4 None of the above.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-12-11 18:50||   2006-12-11 18:50|| Front Page Top

#5 Lol. Dropped. Tuition Refund? Never happen. ;-)
Posted by .com 2006-12-11 18:53||   2006-12-11 18:53|| Front Page Top

#6 When the times as it surely will to press the button and nuke Teheran, I'm not sure Israel will do it.
Posted by phil_b 2006-12-11 22:04||   2006-12-11 22:04|| Front Page Top

#7 Israel should just go ahead and list the countries that they will target in response to a nuclear strike. That list should include Russia and China. And maybe France. That might could make those countries a leetle more serious about Iran's nuclear program.
Posted by markawarka 2006-12-11 22:30||   2006-12-11 22:30|| Front Page Top

#8 Clintonian Amerika, the world-ruling USSA = weak and anti-sovereign OWG Global SSR/USR, is not even officially Communist or Socialist Amerika yet and we've already lost 200Milyuuhn + 1/2 of CONUS-NORAM MINIMA as far as the Chicoms + PC/Deniable Russians are concerned, and before we're even de facto invaded. So, iff Amerika has allegedly lost the above or is STate-PLanned to lose the above, what makes Amers think that the WOT > ONLY A MERE "LIMITED WAR/ATTACK" MEANT ONLY TO HURT-HARM AMERICA = AMERIKA IN A LIMITED, ISOLATED = "CONTAINED" WAY, HENCE NOT A WAR FOR SURVIVAL = NOT A WAR TO THE DEATH! THe only thing I see is that Amer-invading Enemy Armies WILL BE RE-LABELED AS UNO PEACEKEEPERS ON THE MISSION TO PC "SAVE [ANARCHIC/SECTARIAN/CIVIL WARRING]AMERICA = FASCIST AMERIKA FROM ITSELF"!?
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-12-11 22:36||   2006-12-11 22:36|| Front Page Top

17:47 Zenster
15:28 Zenster
00:15 Rafael
23:51 3dc
23:47 JosephMendiola
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:38 Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)
23:37 JosephMendiola
23:24 JosephMendiola
23:05 DMFD
22:52 JosephMendiola
22:51 Captain America
22:50 Captain America
22:43 Anonymoose
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:35 tu3031
22:30 markawarka
22:29 Lone Ranger
22:28 Pappy
22:26 tu3031
22:24 Phineter Thraviger
22:16 Pappy
22:12 Atomic Conspiracy
22:11 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com