Article

2007-01-28 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Brett 2007-01-28 14:01|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I bet he thinks the number of our troops lost is way too high - when it suits his rhetorical purposes.

Posted by xbalanke 2007-01-28 14:37|| 2007-01-28 14:37|| Front Page Top

#2 In a way he's right, because we didn't lose enough lives in the 9/11 attack.

He wasn't killed in it.

There's a special seat in HELL waiting for this asshole - right between Sad-ass and his sons.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2007-01-28 14:44|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html] 2007-01-28 14:44|| Front Page Top

#3 David A. Bell, a professor of history at Johns Hopkins University and a contributing editor for the New Republic, is the author of "The First Total War: Napoleon's Europe and the Birth of Warfare as W.."

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2007-01-28 15:43|| 2007-01-28 15:43|| Front Page Top

#4 ... although Islamist extremists can certainly do huge amounts of harm around the world, it is quite different to suggest that they can threaten the existence of the United States.

The great threat to the existence of the United States are traitors to its Constitution, its founding principles and its liberty; the author of this article being a prime example. He should be tarred and feathered.

Posted by Excalibur 2007-01-28 15:44|| 2007-01-28 15:44|| Front Page Top

#5 this moron definitely does not understand the muzzy ideology. They kill one of ours, well kill a hundred of theirs. That, sadly, is all they understand.

Posted by Broadhead6 2007-01-28 16:20|| 2007-01-28 16:20|| Front Page Top

#6 An RoE I like, Broadhead.

Posted by Brett 2007-01-28 16:23|| 2007-01-28 16:23|| Front Page Top

#7 Wonder if he teaches about Roosevelt's 'complete overreaction' to the events of 12/7/1941?

Posted by DMFD 2007-01-28 17:01|| 2007-01-28 17:01|| Front Page Top

#8 Bit by bit, these defeatist assholes have been chipping away at our resolve. And it's working.

The next terrorist attack on American soil, Job One had better be rounding these bastards up and getting them out of the way so we can fight back unhindered. Enough of this bullshit.

Posted by Dave D.">Dave D. 2007-01-28 17:31|| 2007-01-28 17:31|| Front Page Top

#9 Johns Hopkins, huh? Great...

Posted by imoyaro 2007-01-28 18:24|| 2007-01-28 18:24|| Front Page Top

#10 xbalanke hits it spot on, and I thought the exact same thing when I just read the first paragraph. Using #s like this will be different in different arguments. I bet he goes absolutely @pe-$h!t when one of our soldiers is blown up, but doesn't get the irony in saying 3,000 dead on 9/11 "wasn't enough."

Posted by BA 2007-01-28 19:01|| 2007-01-28 19:01|| Front Page Top

#11 Maybe the bad guys should learn that it is U.S. policy to over react to every mass murder of Americans. Maybe it is U.S. policy to be incredibly more violent, incredibly more deadly, and incredibly more aggressive than the original mass murderers of Americans. Maybe the bad guys should learn that the days of bombing and killing Americans, without a reaction, are as much in the past as the 10th century to which they want to return.

Posted by whatadeal 2007-01-28 22:59|| 2007-01-28 22:59|| Front Page Top

23:49 trailing wife
23:28 trailing wife
23:27 Valentine
23:27 whatadeal
23:25 trailing wife
23:24 trailing wife
23:20 whatadeal
23:18 trailing wife
23:11 whatadeal
23:03 whatadeal
22:59 whatadeal
22:49 KBK
22:40 KBK
22:19 JohnQC
22:06 JohnQC
22:06 Silentbrick
22:05 JohnQC
22:01 JohnQC
21:33 Hillary Rodham
21:27 Phineter Thraviger
21:25 liberalhawk
21:23 BA
21:21 BA
21:19 BA