Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 02/04/2007 View Sat 02/03/2007 View Fri 02/02/2007 View Thu 02/01/2007 View Wed 01/31/2007 View Tue 01/30/2007 View Mon 01/29/2007
1
2007-02-04 Home Front: Politix
Edwards: "We'll Have To Raise Taxes" ($90-$120 Billion A Year)
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-02-04 18:36|| || Front Page|| [11 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 ...The only problem here is that if Edwards got in, the definition of 'wealthy' would be anyone making more than $10K/year....

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2007-02-04 19:39||   2007-02-04 19:39|| Front Page Top

#2 why don't we tax the shit out of NC homes over 20,000 sq ft? No comment, Mr. "Two Americas"?
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-02-04 19:45||   2007-02-04 19:45|| Front Page Top

#3 Would any American friends care to print this out and pass it onto Mr Edwards?

CBO's Capital Gains Error Now Stands At $133 Billion, 68 Percent

To summarize, the CBO said in 2003 that President Bush's capital gains tax cut would 'cost' the treasury $5.4B between 2003-2006.

Ready for this?

In fact receipts were up $133B over the same period.

The Laffer curve works. Tax cuts work.
Posted by Tony (UK) 2007-02-04 19:50||   2007-02-04 19:50|| Front Page Top

#4 Tony, it ain't about bringing money into the treasury. It's about punishing the successful.
Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford  2007-02-04 20:11|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2007-02-04 20:11|| Front Page Top

#5 Oh, I know that Rob ;)

Think Edwards makes over $200k/year? :>
Posted by Tony (UK) 2007-02-04 20:19||   2007-02-04 20:19|| Front Page Top

#6 &^^**^$&$&^%#(*&@)($*_)$*@*^$&*@^$&*(

BEARS SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Surtax on houses over 3000 s.f.

Figure out what it costs in electricity to run said house, everything over is surtaxed. He can afford it - they all can.
Posted by anonymous2u 2007-02-04 21:02||   2007-02-04 21:02|| Front Page Top

#7 How about a 50% tax on all contingency fees?
Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2007-02-04 21:52|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2007-02-04 21:52|| Front Page Top

#8 
Posted by  KBK 2007-02-04 22:01||   2007-02-04 22:01|| Front Page Top

#9 All democrats should be taxed 85% of their income and three organs of our choice. After all, organ donation is for the /common good/. It's not like they need all their organs anyway.
Posted by Silentbrick">Silentbrick  2007-02-04 23:57||   2007-02-04 23:57|| Front Page Top

23:57 Silentbrick
23:47 JosephMendiola
23:36 JosephMendiola
23:34 Red Lief
23:30 USN, ret.
23:27 Alaska Paul
23:24 USN, ret.
23:19 JosephMendiola
23:11 JosephMendiola
23:07 USN, ret.
23:06 JosephMendiola
23:04 gromgoru
23:02 USN, ret.
22:57 3dc
22:53 USN, ret.
22:37 plainslow
22:13 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:01  KBK
21:52 Jackal
21:51 Jackal
21:48 trailing wife
21:46 Anonymoose
21:33 Anonymoose
21:26 Redneck Jim









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com