Article

2007-10-21 Home Front: Politix

Edwards Attacks Clinton on Questionable Contributions

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by gorb 2007-10-21 06:22|| || Front Page|| [6 views ] Top

#1 Mmmm, Clintons. Is there anything they can't make questionable?

Posted by SteveS 2007-10-21 14:20|| 2007-10-21 14:20|| Front Page Top

#2 "'have we already decided who's going to win the New Hampshire primary,' said Edwards"

I think we've pretty much already decided who ain't gonna win the NH primary, John-baby.

And that "who" would be you.

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2007-10-21 14:48|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2007-10-21 14:48|| Front Page Top

#3 Oh, John, just STFU already, would ya? Hillary's going to be the Democrat nominee and there's not a damn thing you or anybody else is gonna do about it.

People expect a Clinton to be corrupt; it simply doesn't matter what Hillary does or what you say about it. She could pop somebody right in full view on the Capitol steps, and the only reaction you'd hear out of her millions of pallid, drooling, shuffling acolytes is "GO, HILLARY!!"

So give it a friggin' break, Breck Boy.

Posted by Dave D.">Dave D. 2007-10-21 16:23|| 2007-10-21 16:23|| Front Page Top

#4 I, for one, encourage Johnny to continue whining, even though Hillary will still end up with Elizabeth's testicles in a jar on the mantle at the end. He's drawing attention to their corrupt past, present, and no doubt, future. I think a lot of people will get tired of it, and in the general election, remember all teh lies, BS, drama, of the Clinton co-presidency...perhaps enough will say "do I want to go through that shit again?"

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2007-10-21 16:42|| 2007-10-21 16:42|| Front Page Top

#5 You know what gets me? People who think Hillary's "reputation of ruthlessness" will help make the trains run on time, when she not only wasn't even able to keep her husband from being a serial adulterer, but actually wound up getting sucked into enabling the behavior herself.

That's tough ruthlessness?

Posted by Abdominal Snowman 2007-10-21 16:50|| 2007-10-21 16:50|| Front Page Top

#6 the "bimbos" would disagree. When Hillary's power is threatened, I'd watch out

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2007-10-21 16:55|| 2007-10-21 16:55|| Front Page Top

#7 So in other words she was good at being ruthless at all the wrong people. It still isn't real "toughness."

Posted by Abdominal Snowman 2007-10-21 17:23|| 2007-10-21 17:23|| Front Page Top

#8 I mean, the threats to our democracy don't come from Billy Boy's previous bimbos.

For the most part.

Posted by Abdominal Snowman 2007-10-21 17:24|| 2007-10-21 17:24|| Front Page Top

#9 the threats to our democracy don't come from Billy Boy's previous bimbos.

Not unless he's bangin' Rosie and t'ain't none of want to go there.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-10-21 22:42|| 2007-10-21 22:42|| Front Page Top

23:51 Old Patriot
23:47 twobyfour
23:43 Zenster
23:41 JosephMendiola
23:39 Zenster
23:32 Verlaine
23:23 Eric Jablow
23:19 Verlaine
23:17 Zenster
23:12 Zenster
23:10 Abu Uluque6305
22:59 Zenster
22:58 Seafarious
22:52 gorb
22:51 Barbara Skolaut
22:48 Barbara Skolaut
22:47 Zenster
22:42 Zenster
22:38 Zenster
22:32 trailing wife
22:31 Zenster
22:30 trailing wife
22:29 Zenster
22:29 Old Patriot