Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 04/13/2008 View Sat 04/12/2008 View Fri 04/11/2008 View Thu 04/10/2008 View Wed 04/09/2008 View Tue 04/08/2008 View Mon 04/07/2008
1
2008-04-13 Home Front: Politix
Boston Globe - Ethanol's Good... Um, Never Mind!
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Raj 2008-04-13 11:31|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top

#1 Ethanol was a misakte - engineers said so back then. But the eco-relgioin drove the discussion, not science and engineers and peopel concerned with consequences of actions (who pointed out the impact on food prices and the environment).

We are all now paying the price for the Eco-nuts rushing a bad change through.


Anyone learn a lesson, re: global warming?

I doubt it. For them it is a religion, not science. Consensus, not proof.
Posted by OldSpook 2008-04-13 12:18||   2008-04-13 12:18|| Front Page Top

#2 Wait till you see carbon caps and trading.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2008-04-13 12:33||   2008-04-13 12:33|| Front Page Top

#3 Bahstun Globe Editorial to come out against LexisNexis and Google in 5...4...3...
Posted by macofromoc 2008-04-13 12:37||   2008-04-13 12:37|| Front Page Top

#4 CORN should be used for food, not motor fuel, and yet the United States is committed to a policy that encourages farmers to turn an increasing amount of their crop into ethanol.

A very sudden, and surprising, concern. I'm sure there is no relation to the item below.

Saudi plans to import wheat to save water
Saudi Arabia’s plan to start importing wheat and end a massive grain self-sufficiency programme it launched more than two decades ago

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2008-04-13 12:49||   2008-04-13 12:49|| Front Page Top

#5 Saudis should plant AGAVE instead of wheat. It doesn't take much water and makes a great drink..
Posted by 3dc 2008-04-13 13:02||   2008-04-13 13:02|| Front Page Top

#6 If they cant do the shots they could do the nectar link
Posted by 3dc 2008-04-13 13:04||   2008-04-13 13:04|| Front Page Top

#7 So what have we learned ...

Hydrocarbons are BAD they cause global warming.
Nuclear power is BAD it releases radioactive waste.
Ethanol fuels are BAD they increase food prices.
Wind power is BAD it blocks Ted Kennedy's view and kills birds.
Hydro-power is BAD it kills fish.
Solar power is BAD it uses scenic landscapes.
Geothermal power is BAD it causes water pollution.
Posted by DMFD 2008-04-13 13:49||   2008-04-13 13:49|| Front Page Top

#8 Eco-hysteria is not about solving a problem.

It's about the warm, gushy feeling of moral superiority that demanding sacrifice (from other people) gives the hysterics.

And collectivism, of course.
Posted by charger 2008-04-13 16:44||   2008-04-13 16:44|| Front Page Top

#9 Being the Boston Globe means never having to say you're sorry. Or wrong...
Posted by tu3031 2008-04-13 21:40||   2008-04-13 21:40|| Front Page Top

23:19 Tepes
22:42 Old Patriot
22:30 Old Patriot
22:28 Frank G
21:59 tu3031
21:55 tu3031
21:53 tu3031
21:51 tu3031
21:48 BA
21:44 tu3031
21:40 tu3031
21:35 JosephMendiola
21:34 tu3031
21:27 sinse
21:26 Frank G
21:18 tu3031
21:06 Woodrow Slusorong7967
20:59 Woodrow Slusorong7967
20:58 Frank G
20:54 Woodrow Slusorong7967
20:50 JosephMendiola
20:49 Frank G
20:49 Anonymoose
20:14 Mitch H.









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com