Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 11/30/2009 View Sun 11/29/2009 View Sat 11/28/2009 View Fri 11/27/2009 View Thu 11/26/2009 View Wed 11/25/2009 View Tue 11/24/2009
1
2009-11-30 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Osmotic Power Plant to Limit Global Warming
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bobby 2009-11-30 07:17|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top

#1 How many places does "clean, fresh water" flow into the sea? Most rivers I've seen are chock-full of sediment. I would think the membranes would get clogged up pretty quickly.
Posted by Spot">Spot  2009-11-30 08:10||   2009-11-30 08:10|| Front Page Top

#2 The problem with sea water for anything is always "biologicals", and filtering them out is an expensive process.

Instead of using membranes for energy, it makes a lot more sense to use them for water purification. They are now making a carbon nanotube filter that will only pass individual molecules of water.

One very simple system that could do this at scale is a double pipeline device, a pipeline within a pipeline. On the ocean floor, next to a coastline, a large storage tank is put in a low-lying area. Leading out from the tank are one or more double pipelines.

The outer pipeline is a big filter that separates out just the water from the sea water. The second inner pipeline does the same, double filtration, in case something penetrates the outer pipeline. Then the fresh water inside the second pipeline flows "downhill" to the tank.

From the tank, fresh water is pumped out to shore.

The only energy used is pumping the fresh water out of the tank. The water pressure on the pipelines do the rest.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2009-11-30 09:12||   2009-11-30 09:12|| Front Page Top

#3 How many places does "clean, fresh water" flow into the sea?thye entire west coast of Canada, and All of Alaska.
Posted by 746 2009-11-30 15:00||   2009-11-30 15:00|| Front Page Top

#4 Is it just me, or does anyone else get the feeling these small or minor "green" = environ correct ENFACS are SUB-PLANST/FACS OF SOMETHING IN OWG-NWO "JUNKERS GLOB GRUPPE" LARGER SCALE, SOMETHING NOT SO "GREEN"???
Posted by JosephMendiola">JosephMendiola  2009-11-30 18:11|| na]">[na]  2009-11-30 18:11|| Front Page Top

#5 Not just you, JosephM. Because mostly these things are not self-supporting, which means the money has to come from someone else's pocket. The approach is thought globally and applied locally.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2009-11-30 22:31||   2009-11-30 22:31|| Front Page Top

#6 5 million sq meters of fish net? Sure,that sounds environmentally responsible.
Posted by Skunky Glins****">Skunky Glins****  2009-11-30 22:57||   2009-11-30 22:57|| Front Page Top

23:58 JosephMendiola
23:45 JosephMendiola
23:30 JosephMendiola
23:04 lex
22:57 Skunky Glins****
22:50 DMFD
22:36 trailing wife
22:31 trailing wife
22:30 USN, Ret.
22:28 trailing wife
22:24 trailing wife
22:22 trailing wife
22:06 Lone Ranger
21:36 JosephMendiola
21:34 Cornsilk Blondie
21:20 JosephMendiola
21:17 gorb
21:08 Barbara Skolaut
21:05 Barbara Skolaut
21:04 JosephMendiola
20:58 JosephMendiola
20:53 JosephMendiola
20:49 JosephMendiola
20:48 twobyfour









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com