Article

2009-12-03 Science

NATURE Runs Bitter, Anti-Skeptic Editorial

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2009-12-03 10:58|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 They're just annoyed about being name-checked in the most embarrassing leaked email, the one about "Mike's Nature trick".

Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H. 2009-12-03 16:21|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/] 2009-12-03 16:21|| Front Page Top

#2 Same old, same old. The vaguest of claims, followed by cherry picking of the evidence.

No mention of GHGs, CO2 and the fact southern Hemisphere sea ice has been at record levels for the last couple of years and now icebergs are at the furthest north (in the SH) ever recorded.

Posted by phil_b 2009-12-03 21:33|| 2009-12-03 21:33|| Front Page Top

#3 No moose, NATURE does not aim to entertain. The British journal that does that is New Scientist. NATURE is part of a publishing group that includes a number of mags.

Posted by lord garth 2009-12-03 23:13|| 2009-12-03 23:13|| Front Page Top

23:49 Plastic Snoopy
23:45 CrazyFool
23:21 Karl Rove
23:20 trailing wife
23:13 lord garth
23:00 trailing wife
23:00 Grunter
22:46 Mullah Richard
22:38 Frank G
22:29 lord garth
22:26 Frank G
22:05 Frank G
21:58 Barbara Skolaut
21:52 Mike
21:43 trailing wife
21:39 Procopius2k
21:33 phil_b
21:31 Procopius2k
21:28 Procopius2k
21:24 49 Pan
21:23 49 Pan
21:21 phil_b
21:16 Glenmore
21:09 whitecollar redneck