Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 03/22/2010 View Sun 03/21/2010 View Sat 03/20/2010 View Fri 03/19/2010 View Thu 03/18/2010 View Wed 03/17/2010 View Tue 03/16/2010
1
2010-03-22 Great White North
Vice-recteur warns Ann Coulter
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2010-03-22 04:04|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Tell Vice-recteur aux études Houle to piss off and get someone else to speak. They don't deserve the likes of Coulter. Let the dead bury the dead!
Posted by Besoeker 2010-03-22 07:55||   2010-03-22 07:55|| Front Page Top

#2 
I would, however, like to inform you, or perhaps remind you, that our domestic laws, both provincial and federal, delineate freedom of expression (or “free speech”) in a manner that is somewhat different than the approach taken in the United States. I therefore encourage you to educate yourself, if need be, as to what is acceptable in Canada and to do so before your planned visit here. You will realize that Canadian law puts reasonable limits on the freedom of expression.
Posted by Parabellum 2010-03-22 08:19|| http://sidemeat.wordpress.com/  2010-03-22 08:19|| Front Page Top

#3 I think it would be hilarious for the Canadian "Human Rights" kangaroo courts commission to charge Ann Coulter with a crime. They are already skating on thin ice, and it might break their back, especially if she were to very carefully phrase her speech to break a bunch of their rules, without sounding like it.

And while they were trying to disabuse her, she could continue to savage them in her column, and do her level best to create an international incident out of it.
Posted by  Anonymoose 2010-03-22 09:55||   2010-03-22 09:55|| Front Page Top

#4 Heh, I very much DO hope Ann Coulter hears this vice-rectal's warning, and rest confident in her ability to stick it to him in a very memorable way.

They are already skating on thin ice, and it might break their back, especially if she were to very carefully phrase her speech to break a bunch of their rules, without sounding like it.

One possibility is to phrase everything as "the Canadian Human Rights commissions have warned me not to tell you that muslims are..." so that she can STILL get her point across while claiming that she was only talking about the commissions, not Muslims.
Posted by Ptah  2010-03-22 10:30|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org  2010-03-22 10:30|| Front Page Top

#5 I would like to see her make a speech where every word was previously uttered by Canadian muslims and then dare Canada to prosecute. A Fitna for the Great White North.
Posted by ed 2010-03-22 10:33||   2010-03-22 10:33|| Front Page Top

#6 You will realize that Canadian law puts reasonable limits on the freedom of expression.
Depending on who is doing the reasoning...
Posted by Free Radical 2010-03-22 15:50||   2010-03-22 15:50|| Front Page Top

23:49 gorb
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:09 Asymmetrical Triangulation
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:07 3dc
23:06 3dc
22:30 Asymmetrical Triangulation
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:08 49 Pan
22:07 JosephMendiola
22:00 JosephMendiola
21:49 Hotspur666
21:42 OldSpook
21:41 Hotspur666
21:40 JosephMendiola
21:39 OldSpook
21:38 OldSpook
20:56 Nimble Spemble
20:50 Nimble Spemble
20:35 SteveS
20:18 newc
20:09 Shieldwolf
20:07 chris
19:59 Shieldwolf









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com