Article

2010-04-12 Home Front: WoT

Obama: Al-Qaida would use nuke if it could

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by gorb 2010-04-12 03:10|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 Loose cannons = Iran, North, Korea, Pakistan. Difficult to deal with insanity from mad mullahs and NK. Pakistan is at risk because of shaky internal politics and AQ.

Posted by JohnQC 2010-04-12 10:01|| 2010-04-12 10:01|| Front Page Top

#2 Oh, good grief. He's just now figuring out the real terrorist threat? I hear all the pols are at a loss of what to do now that health care has been rammed down our throats--please, please don't outsource this to Pelosi, too!!!!She'll let Iran build them, NK sell them, but sanctions won't begin until 2020. Oh, wait, that is current policy already.

Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2010-04-12 10:24|| 2010-04-12 10:24|| Front Page Top

#3 And then there are those of us who aren't comfortable with Comrade Zero's finger on the button either.

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-04-12 12:06|| 2010-04-12 12:06|| Front Page Top

#4 Oh, good grief. He's just now figuring out the real terrorist threat?

Its difficult to address the real terrorist threat if you are unwilling to define it. If you define these islamic terrorist threats as "man-made disaster threats," you are unlikely to do much about these threats. If the president is so afraid of being PC and ticking off and hurting the feelings of the muslims, he is going to be blind to islamic terrorist threats. And if he has islam in his own background, it is unlikely he is going to criticize that which he is. Further, if he thinks the real threat to America is the vast right wing conspiracy and the racists, he is unlikely to address islamic terrorism.

Posted by JohnQC 2010-04-12 12:17|| 2010-04-12 12:17|| Front Page Top

#5 From Google search: nuclear weapon fiction books.

Results 1 - 10 of about 803,000 for nuclear weapon fiction books.

I wonder if he read them all.

Posted by Willy 2010-04-12 12:34|| 2010-04-12 12:34|| Front Page Top

#6 How 'bout this one of the Golfer in Chief on vacation then?

Oh, and the html tags seem to be out of synch.

Sorry/thanks.

Posted by gorb 2010-04-12 13:26|| 2010-04-12 13:26|| Front Page Top

#7 That image is fine, thanks.

Which html tags? The links seems ok.

AoS

Posted by Steve White 2010-04-12 13:38|| 2010-04-12 13:38|| Front Page Top

#8 "They found out about my sister
and kicked me out of the Navy,
they woulda strung me up if they could..."
-- Randy Neuman, "The Naked Man"

Posted by mojo 2010-04-12 14:29|| 2010-04-12 14:29|| Front Page Top

#9 Its difficult to address the real terrorist threat if you are unwilling to define it.

Speaking of which.... has the U.N. ever defined what Terrorism is?

I know the Obumble administration has (as in: Tea Party == Terrorism) but I haven't heard that the U.N. ever has.

Posted by CrazyFool 2010-04-12 14:29|| 2010-04-12 14:29|| Front Page Top

#10 they won't use it unless obama says so

Posted by chris 2010-04-12 16:15|| 2010-04-12 16:15|| Front Page Top

#11 "Obama: Al-Qaida would use nuke if it could"Duh? How many advisors did it take to come up with this conclusion?

Posted by Flaper Scourge of the Algonquins4926 2010-04-12 18:59|| 2010-04-12 18:59|| Front Page Top

#12 TOPIX [old] > IRAN MAY HAVE A NUCLEAR BOMB BY DECEMBER.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2010-04-12 23:44|| 2010-04-12 23:44|| Front Page Top

00:01 Mike Hunt
23:58 JosephMendiola
23:54 JosephMendiola
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:44 JosephMendiola
23:35 Alaska Paul in Langly, BC
23:31 Rex Mundi
22:34 Pappy
22:10 Anonymoose
22:09 lord garth
22:07 trailing wife
22:01 Barbara Skolaut
21:48 yo adrian
21:46 phil_b
21:45 JosephMendiola
21:39 Secret Master
21:39 JosephMendiola
21:32 Frank G
21:28 ~~war on terror~~
21:24 phil_b
21:20 trailing wife
21:14 phil_b
21:13 trailing wife
21:00 borgboy