Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 07/03/2010 View Fri 07/02/2010 View Thu 07/01/2010 View Wed 06/30/2010 View Tue 06/29/2010 View Mon 06/28/2010 View Sun 06/27/2010
1
2010-07-03 Home Front: Politix
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2010-07-03 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 I'm just awaiting the dead cat bounce. This loser is seems is trying to make Carter look adequate. At the worst possible time, we get a bumbling, socialist, tool for president.
Posted by Jefferson 2010-07-03 00:09||   2010-07-03 00:09|| Front Page Top

#2 Jefferson, it is not by a coincidence, it is by a design.
Posted by twobyfour 2010-07-03 01:17||   2010-07-03 01:17|| Front Page Top

#3 

Strongly Approve numbers mean nothing. Die Hards are Die Hards.

Look at the Strongly Disapprove number for a real take on how people feel.

44%!
Posted by Parabellum 2010-07-03 08:47|| http://sidemeat.wordpress.com/  2010-07-03 08:47|| Front Page Top

#4 I honestly have to wonder if the numbers for Obama wouldn't be much worse if he wasn't black? I believe a significant number of people are so PC that they are concerned about being racist if they disapprove.
Posted by NoMoreBS 2010-07-03 12:49||   2010-07-03 12:49|| Front Page Top

#5 I would add to what Parabellum says: It's not only the strongly approve (whose core is always around 25-30%), but the strongly disapprove (whose core is also in that range) that is 15 to 20 points above the core that is important. That 15 to 20 points above corerepresents the somewhat swing vote the got the donks in power and they have, to this point, lost.
Posted by anymouse  2010-07-03 16:17||   2010-07-03 16:17|| Front Page Top

#6 NoMoreBS - in that case, there would be 0% who strongly disapprove, since a white guy (even a DemoncRat) with exactly the same "credentials" would never have been nominated, let alone elected, in the first place.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut 2010-07-03 17:39||   2010-07-03 17:39|| Front Page Top

#7 with exactly the same "credentials"
Barb Skolaut


Credentials?...... Examples please.
Posted by Besoeker 2010-07-03 19:46||   2010-07-03 19:46|| Front Page Top

#8 "Credentials?...... Examples please." - Besoeker

Well, lessee - no management experience (or experience doing anything productive, for that matter); thuggish friends; hangs with communists and violent anarchists; votes "present" because he doesn't want to be caught making a decision (or maybe is too dumb uninformed to make one); proudly embraces a religious "leader" who publicly damns America (in church, no less) - until it becomes inconvenient, then throws him under the bus with the rest of the crowd; says his election will cause the seas to subside because he's the Second Coming ....

Is that enough for a start?
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2010-07-03 20:37||   2010-07-03 20:37|| Front Page Top

23:43 49 Pan
23:41 chris
23:36 chris
23:24 chris
23:24 KBK
23:18 TEX
23:13  abu do you love
22:25 Eric Jablow
21:59 American Delight
21:56 Laura Lynn Hardy
21:55 Laura Lynn Hardy
21:53 Laura Lynn Hardy
21:51 Laura Lynn Hardy
21:47 Frank G
21:35 Pappy
21:20 lotp
21:10 gorb
21:05 Goodluck
20:53 gorb
20:45 3dc
20:39 Secret Asian Man
20:37 Deacon Blues
20:37 Barbara Skolaut
20:27 Secret Asian Man









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com