Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/17/2013 View Tue 04/16/2013 View Mon 04/15/2013 View Sun 04/14/2013 View Sat 04/13/2013 View Fri 04/12/2013 View Thu 04/11/2013
1
2013-04-17 Home Front: Politix
US Senate C'tee: US Will Assist Israel If It Attacks Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by trailing wife 2013-04-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 Now I can stop worrying.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2013-04-17 00:56||   2013-04-17 00:56|| Front Page Top

#2 IMO Tel Aviv = PM Netanyahu + Govt. recognize that the only real way to stop Iran's NucProgs is via attack, invasion, + ultimately OCCUPATION, not just attack. The alternate is to get Iran to unilaterally halt its programme.

As things stand, neither the US nor Israel has any cause to attack Iran - while Iran is dev the capability, economies, or proficiencies to produce NucWeaps, it hasn't actually done so, nor unlike Saddam is there proof that Iran intends to give deadly NucTech knowledge to Radicalist Groups. In addition, both Russia + China are opposed to any Milaction agz Iran.

UNLESS A UN-APPROVED COALITION + MANDATE TO INVADE + OCCUPY IRAN IS CREATED, THIS RESOLUTION IS JUST PCORRECT COMEDY, AS RIDICULOUS + FARSICAL AS TAKING AWAY EVERY AMER'S RIGHT TO OWN GUNS WHILE DELIBERAT LEAVING US BORDERS UNSECURED.

SOLVING A PROB BY NOT SOLVING IT, BUT WANTING THE MAINSTREAM OR ELECTORATE TO BELIEVE IT WAS.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-04-17 01:33||   2013-04-17 01:33|| Front Page Top

#3 You never have 100% proof, but you act upon the information you have. That's the way it is.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2013-04-17 03:02||   2013-04-17 03:02|| Front Page Top

#4 Would congress declare war on Iran with a veto proof majority against the will of the president?

Would congress swiftly impeach, convict and remove a president who refused to come to Israel's aid?

All of the above is highly unlikely, and the power of the purse can constrain but not compel action.

This resolution might be well intended but it looks like an empty promise.
Posted by Elmerert Hupens2660 2013-04-17 07:39||   2013-04-17 07:39|| Front Page Top

#5  As per PACIFICNEWSCENTER [aka Guam K-57 Radio News] Artic, USMC Commandant Amos has indic that the Sequester may undermine the Nation's need for having a Marine Corps - IIUC, IOW THE SEQUESTER = US DEBT BURDEN IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO THE MARINE CORPS [ + likely other US Elite Units, etc]???

ADVANTAGE > CHINA = SSSHHHH "DPRK/NOKOR", IRAN, HARD BOYZ + NUCLEAR GLOBAL JIHAD.

The more + longer that the DemoLeft + aligned keep expanding the US Debt levels, the greater the likelihood that Israel will indeed be on its own be it any attack on Iran , or in just confronting the general Militant threat or hostile post-"Spring", pro-Islamist + Hardline Sharia, pro Nukulaar Arab-Muslim States.

WE'RE ALL OWG UNO "PEACEKEEPERS" = "GLOBAL PARA-MILITARY CONSTABULARIES/POLICE" NOW???

["FIFTH ELEMENT"S SCANTILY-CLAD MILA "MMMUUULLTTIIPPAASSSS" JOVOVITCH here].
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-04-17 20:06||   2013-04-17 20:06|| Front Page Top

23:14 gorb
23:09 gorb
22:38 Frank G
22:15 JosephMendiola
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:58 Thaique Squank4053
21:47 SteveS
21:32 CrazyFool
21:28 Frank G
21:07 junkiron
20:26 JosephMendiola
20:24 Charles
20:06 JosephMendiola
19:45 Uncle Phester
19:45 Besoeker
19:42 Uncle Phester
19:37 Besoeker
19:34 Besoeker
19:34 trailing wife
19:33 tu3031
19:31 trailing wife
19:25 JonC
19:15 trailing wife
19:14 Barbara









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com