Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 03/10/2015 View Mon 03/09/2015 View Sat 03/07/2015 View Fri 03/06/2015 View Thu 03/05/2015 View Wed 03/04/2015 View Tue 03/03/2015
1
2015-03-10 Home Front: WoT
Obama: 'Once I sign the agreement, you can read the agreement'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by  Hupineger Glomomp52169  2015-03-10 08:40|| || Front Page|| [12 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

#1 Two names for the Dems to consider:
Ted Kennedy, Yuri Andropov.

I've got others but that should do. (I know it won't, but, what the heck)
Posted by AlanC 2015-03-10 12:34||   2015-03-10 12:34|| Front Page Top

#2 I guess he doesn't know about the Democrat senators visiting Ortega when Reagan was president and has forgotten Pelosi visiting Assad after Bush asked her not to.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2015-03-10 12:35||   2015-03-10 12:35|| Front Page Top

#3 Zero is more annoying than an ingrown toe nail, and about as painful. What will the US population do when they find out that his whole life has been fabricated and influenced by foreign interests unfriendly to the USA ?
Posted by Flirt de Medici2727 2015-03-10 12:47||   2015-03-10 12:47|| Front Page Top

#4 "the continuation of a partisan strategy to undermine the president's authority."

What authority does El Presidente have to make a binding agreement with any state?
Posted by gorb 2015-03-10 12:56||   2015-03-10 12:56|| Front Page Top

#5 Sounds like all the Republicans did was to state the obvious which is that no way in hell can the Champ get them to ratify his little agreement as a binding and long lasting treaty so, once again, he is attempting to make an end run around them. But it's no surprise that liars like him are uncomfortable with the truth. The only surprise is that these nearly but not quite 50 senators had the guts to tell it like it is.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2015-03-10 13:23||   2015-03-10 13:23|| Front Page Top

#6 Yeah well... you don't like it you can go fuck yourself.
Posted by DarthVader 2015-03-10 13:35||   2015-03-10 13:35|| Front Page Top

#7 Sounds like all the Republicans did was to state the obvious which is that no way in hell can the Champ get them to ratify his little agreement as a binding and long lasting treaty so, once again, he is attempting to make an end run around them.

To be more accurate, it's "no way in hell can you call it a treaty, and thus call it 'enforceable', if Congress doesn't sign off on it. And we aren't going to sign off on it unless we know what's in it beforehand - not when it shows up on our desks."
Posted by Pappy 2015-03-10 13:53||   2015-03-10 13:53|| Front Page Top

#8 It's dead the day another executive takes office.

Thank Obama for drawing the stark line for any intelligent Trunk (yeah, sort of an oxymoron there) candidate to split the Jewish (and funding) base between the world socialists first and all the rest.
Posted by Procopius2k 2015-03-10 14:13||   2015-03-10 14:13|| Front Page Top

#9 Obama: 'Once I sign the agreement, you can read the agreement' The last time the Congress bought a "pig in the poke," it got us in a lot of trouble which is still on-going (ahem, cough, Obamacare).
Posted by JohnQC 2015-03-10 15:09||   2015-03-10 15:09|| Front Page Top

#10 It would seem to me that an agreement with a foreign government is, in fact (if not in law) a treaty, and would not be binding without ratification by the Senate. And that treaties are intended to be gnereated with the advice as well as consent of the Senate - and the President is explicitly refusing to incorporate any advice.
Posted by Glenmore 2015-03-10 15:39||   2015-03-10 15:39|| Front Page Top

#11 To paraphrase Forrest Gump: Dictatorial is as Dictatorial does.
Posted by OldSpook 2015-03-10 15:58||   2015-03-10 15:58|| Front Page Top

#12 Not sure what bothers me more - this statement from a sitting President, or from a former Con Law prof.
Posted by Iblis 2015-03-10 17:58||   2015-03-10 17:58|| Front Page Top

#13 Yeah, cuz its a real take me word for it atmosphere going on right now.

I think he studied ConLaw much like a torturer studies anatomy.
Posted by swksvolFF 2015-03-10 18:23||   2015-03-10 18:23|| Front Page Top

#14 It's another type of conlaw. Like the one OGs in prison know.
Posted by chris 2015-03-10 21:54||   2015-03-10 21:54|| Front Page Top

23:41 newc
23:36 newc
23:15 JosephMendiola
22:59 JosephMendiola
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:26 49 Pan
22:24 JosephMendiola
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:17 DarthVader
22:01 chris
22:01 JosephMendiola
21:54 chris
21:50 chris
21:47 lord garth
21:39 whitecollar redneck
21:32 dlr
21:02 Shipman
20:56 Capsu78
20:28 49 Pan
20:21 JosephMendiola
20:20 Besoeker
19:17 Glenmore
19:13 Glenmore
19:08 tu3031









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com