Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 12/02/2015 View Tue 12/01/2015 View Mon 11/30/2015 View Sun 11/29/2015 View Sat 11/28/2015 View Fri 11/27/2015 View Thu 11/26/2015
1
2015-12-02 India-Pakistan
Taj Mahal 'not a Hindu temple'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2015-12-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 When Adam, a Hindu believer,
Laid eyes on the figure of Eva,
The first masturbator
Invented a Veda --
"You, madam, were sacred to Shiva!"
Posted by Zenobia Floger6220 2015-12-02 03:24||   2015-12-02 03:24|| Front Page Top

#2 As I recall, it was originally a mausoleum for a favored wife. If the moose have their way, multiple factors will lead to it being bulldozed.
Posted by Skidmark 2015-12-02 06:36||   2015-12-02 06:36|| Front Page Top

#3 If they call it a Hindu Temple it will be bombed. If they call it a mosque it will last forever.
Posted by jvalentour 2015-12-02 10:13||   2015-12-02 10:13|| Front Page Top

#4 pick three of the lawyers and disappear them forever. The rest won't be such asshats
Posted by Frank G 2015-12-02 11:55||   2015-12-02 11:55|| Front Page Top

#5 Something odd in this story. Says it is not a Hindu temple but then says built by Mughal Emporer Shah Jahan. I thought the Mughals were Muslims? It also says Muslims be restricted from offering prayers at the location.

Sounds like they are saying it was determined to not be a Muslim temple.

Anyway, saying it is not a temple won't get the Muslims to spare it if they get the chance.
Posted by rjschwarz 2015-12-02 16:25||   2015-12-02 16:25|| Front Page Top

#6 rjschwarz, the Wikipedia article on the Taj Mahal addresses all those questions. Key to the Hindu temple claim, Wikipedia reports:

In 2000, India's Supreme Court dismissed P. N. Oak's petition[64] to declare that a Hindu king built the Taj Mahal.[61][65] In 2005 a similar petition was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. This case was brought by Amar Nath Mishra, a social worker and preacher who says that the Taj Mahal was built by the Hindu King Parmar Dev in 1196.[66]

The Moghuls are what the Mongols became after they converted to Islam and began conquering northern India. Muslims are currently allowed to pray at the on-site mosque between twelve and two p.m. on Fridays. If the site was originally a temple to Shiva, that ended when the local maharajah accepted a city palace in exchange for the land almost four centuries ago.
Posted by trailing wife 2015-12-02 17:43||   2015-12-02 17:43|| Front Page Top

#7 This controversy over the Taj Mahal has been going on forevar! since I was a kid.

Nice to know that in 2015 it still hasn't abated, nor been resolved.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2015-12-02 22:07||   2015-12-02 22:07|| Front Page Top

#8 They werent that good of a band either
Posted by Cheaderhead 2015-12-02 22:40||   2015-12-02 22:40|| Front Page Top

23:39 rjschwarz
22:46 Skidmark
22:41 JosephMendiola
22:40 Cheaderhead
22:37 Skidmark
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:14 Frank G
22:07 JosephMendiola
22:05 JosephMendiola
21:58 JosephMendiola
20:48 Varmint Clunk9643
20:44 RandomJD
20:28 Procopius2k
20:10 charger
20:08 charger
20:06 JosephMendiola
20:03 charger
20:02 JosephMendiola
19:53 JosephMendiola
19:49 Rambler in Virginia
19:49 JosephMendiola
19:43 Zenobia Floger6220
19:31 Procopius2k









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com