Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 03/17/2016 View Wed 03/16/2016 View Tue 03/15/2016 View Mon 03/14/2016 View Sat 03/12/2016 View Fri 03/11/2016 View Thu 03/10/2016
1
2016-03-17 -Lurid Crime Tales-
NSA said 'no can do' to Clinton request for secure Blackberry
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-17 08:21|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 So State Department Dip Security knew she was in violation. State Info Management (IMO) and Security folks knew she was in violation. NSA probably suspected or soon learned she was in violation, and everyone on her staff or associated with her (to include the White House Communications Detachment) knew as well.

Nobody said anything about her 'work around' until the Benghazi committee uncovered the violation. Oh well, if we can't 'report' the violations, we might as well exploit them.

Among others, I think it might be time to ask the Director NSA some rather pointed questions. Director of Diplomatic Security, please wait outside in the hall with your legal council.

Yes, you are correct. Special Intelligence collection on high-profile foreign targets, diplomats, and others will be the topic of conversation. US Persons caught up in the mix, a potential added bonus.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-17 08:39||   2016-03-17 08:39|| Front Page Top

#2 [W]e began examining options for S [Secretary Clinton] with respect to secure “Blackberry-like” communications … the current state of the art is not too user friendly, has no infrastructure at State and is very expensive…each time we asked the question “What was the solution for POTUS?” we were politely told to shut up and color … NSA opened the door for us to establish requirements and they would try to help…

A 'thumbs down' from NSA likely indicates a 'thumbs down' from POTUS as well. Why limit the listening and monitoring to SCIF traffic? Forcing her into an open system made collection on her considerably more inclusive and less painstaking.

Just a thought. Yes sinister, but still a thought.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-17 08:58||   2016-03-17 08:58|| Front Page Top

#3 'Knead to know'
Posted by Skidmark 2016-03-17 10:16||   2016-03-17 10:16|| Front Page Top

#4 I think this is a more accurate account.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2016-03-17 20:14||   2016-03-17 20:14|| Front Page Top

23:45 jvalentour
23:22 Procopius2k
23:16 Heriberto Splat6450
23:15 Snakes Sproing3870
23:10 Fleans Angish6390
23:05 Thor Splat3669
23:00 Chusong Dark Lord of the Algonquins6851
22:55 Chunky Hupinegum7348
22:50 Skunky Snusomble4733
22:18 NoMoreBS
21:53 Betty White1068
21:50 Skidmark
21:47 Skidmark
21:39 Betty White1068
21:32 Skidmark
21:32 European Conservative
21:25 Richard Aubrey
21:22 Skidmark
21:12 junkiron
20:59 Frank G
20:58 Frank G
20:58 trailing wife
20:52 trailing wife
20:45 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com