Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 11/23/2016 View Tue 11/22/2016 View Mon 11/21/2016 View Sun 11/20/2016 View Sat 11/19/2016 View Fri 11/18/2016 View Thu 11/17/2016
1
2016-11-23 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russian Media Outlet Lenta.ru Tells Story Of Russia's Lone Aircraft Carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2016-11-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [6 views ]  Top

#1 The Russian navy still needs planes capable of providing cover for its deployment off the coast – primarily in order to defend its own sea borders in the Arctic and in the Pacific Ocean.

Hold on, hold on: I know I'm not a Navy guy, but isn't this exactly *not* why you go to all the expense and trouble of building and maintaining aircraft carriers? I though they were to project power far afield, not for defense close to home. That's how we, the Brits, and French do it. That's how the Indians and Chinese are going to do it. Or am I missing something here?
Posted by Secret Master 2016-11-23 00:22||   2016-11-23 00:22|| Front Page Top

#2 Secret Master,

There is a school of thought - growing in recent years - that the Kuznetsov was designed not to go up against the USN's supercarriers but rather to protect the USSR's missile sub bastions against NATO patrol planes. That idea does make sense when you remember that a single squadron of F-14s would have sliced and diced the Kuznetsov's 10-plane air group without even working up a sweat, and although there was a lot of talk at the time about the carriers going north (something that scared the hell out of the Soviets) the Navy regarded that as a scare tactic more than anything else.

There was never any realistic chance that the projected Soviet carriers could take on the old Cold War carrier force (the USN plus the 2 French carriers), so there's the likelihood that the only reason they were built in the first place was so the USSR could say, "We have carriers too, fear us!!"

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2016-11-23 04:51||   2016-11-23 04:51|| Front Page Top

#3 Thank you Mike!
Posted by Secret Master 2016-11-23 09:38||   2016-11-23 09:38|| Front Page Top

#4 Most excellent link, although the current air wing is 10 plus 3 Mig-29, it was designed for more. At best a training carrier, but how how they training?
Posted by Shipman 2016-11-23 20:38||   2016-11-23 20:38|| Front Page Top

23:50 Zenobia Floger6220
22:47 SteveS
22:11 Pappy
21:57 Glenmore
21:53 Frank G
21:46 trailing wife
21:41 trailing wife
21:38 trailing wife
21:33 trailing wife
21:12 Zenobia Floger6220
21:00 Shipman
20:55 Blossom Unains5562
20:52 Blossom Unains5562
20:52 Shipman
20:49 Shipman
20:40 Shipman
20:38 Shipman
20:32 Shipman
20:30 Blossom Unains5562
20:27 Shipman
20:19 Shipman
20:15 Nimble Spemble
19:58 Zenobia Floger6220
19:14 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com