Article

2017-10-09 Home Front: Politix

Senator Feinstein says no law could've stopped Vegas gunman

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by gorb 2017-10-09 04:11|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 "We want every American to feel comfortable..."

And really...what's more important...being safe or feeling comfortable?

Posted by DepotGuy 2017-10-09 08:10|| 2017-10-09 08:10|| Front Page Top

#2 The Sen. Dianne Feinstein?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-10-09 11:27|| 2017-10-09 11:27|| Front Page Top

#3 This isn't a "come to Jesus" on her part. This is battlefield prep for "laws can't help, so total ban is needed."

Posted by M. Murcek 2017-10-09 11:50|| 2017-10-09 11:50|| Front Page Top

#4 I agree Murcek. Prepping the battlespace.

"It's a two-page bill, I'll send a copy of it to anyone who calls our office, and you can look at it yourself," Feinstein said. "It does not take anyone's gun."
"We want every American to feel comfortable packing a concealed weapon around the country? I represent 40 million Californians, and I can say without hesitation Californians do not want concealed carry."

Willful ignorance. A vast majority of people outside the blue areas on the coast of CA are very much for it. They live in the third world hellhole Sacramento has created and don't feel safe or the government looks out for their interests and safety. (Hint: It really doesn't)

Globalists (liberals, progressives) will not stop until they have complete power over everyone's life. Which means they need your guns to do it.

Posted by DarthVader 2017-10-09 12:38|| 2017-10-09 12:38|| Front Page Top

#5 Sen. Dianne Feinstein told CBS "Face the Nation" no law would have stopped the Las Vegas shooter

Oh, look, an acorn!

Posted by regular joe 2017-10-09 14:43|| 2017-10-09 14:43|| Front Page Top

#6 A new Donk strategy - try to say something half way reasonable ... then demand irrational gun bans.

Posted by Iblis 2017-10-09 17:10|| 2017-10-09 17:10|| Front Page Top

#7 Unless you believe that this nut-case was under the impression that it is legal to shoot at crowds of people you must accept that he was not one who avoids breaking laws. Thus it is almost impossible to believe that some new gun law would deter him from any action at all.
Converting a rifle to automatic fire is a felony.
The only reason for passing new laws would be to make it harder for a feloniously minded person to arm himself for the mayhem he planned.
The device that it is said to convert his guns to automatic firing was outlawed until 2010, and I do not understand why it was made legal then. Perhaps the Obama administration can explain it.
Since only legal sales are affected by laws, outlawing things tends to drive their sale underground, which actually makes them harder to control.
It is only honest folk who would think of paying attention to new gun laws. They are precisely those who you do not need control.
All of this is so obvious it is probably silly to bother noticing it.

Posted by Daniel 2017-10-09 18:28|| 2017-10-09 18:28|| Front Page Top

22:28 Frank G
22:17 Frank G
21:54 Besoeker
21:32 phil_b
21:18 KBK
20:48 Skidmark
20:26 phil_b
20:21 Alaska Paul
20:13 phil_b
19:54 trailing wife
19:52 Iblis
19:36 Woodrow
19:21 Procopius2k
19:04 AlanC
19:00 swksvolFF
18:55 SteveS
18:53 AlanC
18:50 AlanC
18:49 swksvolFF
18:28 Daniel
18:27 swksvolFF
17:30 rjschwarz
17:29 Ebbesing Glung7634
17:10 Iblis