Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/18/2018 View Tue 04/17/2018 View Mon 04/16/2018 View Sun 04/15/2018 View Sat 04/14/2018 View Fri 04/13/2018 View Thu 04/12/2018
1
2018-04-18 Home Front: Culture Wars
Supreme Court strikes down key deportation provision, with Gorsuch help
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Skidmark 2018-04-18 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 so all Congress would need to do would be to adequately define 'Crime of Violence' in the statute
Posted by lord garth 2018-04-18 00:08||   2018-04-18 00:08|| Front Page Top

#2 According to Gorsuch the way the law was written it could be used to abuse the rights of legal citizens, which goes against the will of the original framers. In other words, technically the law just needs proper rewriting for Gorsuch to allow it to stand.
Posted by Ulaigum Ebbineng7056 2018-04-18 05:42||   2018-04-18 05:42|| Front Page Top

#3 The word on Gorsuch was always that he calls them like he sees them. No guarantee you'll like the result.
Posted by Shaling Angeresing2962 2018-04-18 06:24||   2018-04-18 06:24|| Front Page Top

#4 Actually this seems a fair point.

Write the law properly Congress.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2018-04-18 06:59||   2018-04-18 06:59|| Front Page Top

#5 Write the law properly Congress.

Golly, BP, I can't think of any one action that would solve more problems than this.

Clean up all those squishy laws that allow the untrammeled abuse by the bureaucracy, corruption processes in the dozens.

Gee, I think that may be what the founders had in mind, no?
Posted by AlanC 2018-04-18 08:45||   2018-04-18 08:45|| Front Page Top

#6 ...but,but,but the SJW crowd says icky words are violence!
Posted by Procopius2k 2018-04-18 09:01||   2018-04-18 09:01|| Front Page Top

#7 alanc

you make a good point, many, many laws are, as you say, squishy

the problem with fixing the squishiness is that the squish is there on purpose

in the case at hand, the cops probably had Mr. Dimaya on several counts but he pleaded down to burglary (which Gorsuch found is not obviously violent). Had he pleaded to 'breaking and entering', it would have been different
Posted by lord garth 2018-04-18 09:07||   2018-04-18 09:07|| Front Page Top

#8 Yep, LG, much, maybe most, of the squishiness is there on purpose depending on who's doing what to whom.

The growth of the bureaucracy didn't happen by accident. The more loop holes and nuances the more chances for wealth manipulation.

Make the laws tight and Insty's phrase comes in; "Where's the graft in that?"
Posted by AlanC 2018-04-18 09:14||   2018-04-18 09:14|| Front Page Top

23:55 Injun Bucket8891
23:54 Injun Bucket8891
23:53 Injun Bucket8891
23:48 Injun Bucket8891
23:45 Injun Bucket8891
23:43 Injun Bucket8891
23:42 trailing wife
23:41 Injun Bucket8891
23:41 Anguper Hupomosing9418
23:38 Injun Bucket8891
23:37 Injun Bucket8891
23:20 Ulaigum Ebbineng7056
23:05 Injun Bucket8891
22:54 newc
22:46 rjschwarz
22:43 rjschwarz
22:41 rjschwarz
22:38 Spirt Henbane9901
22:36 Spirt Henbane9901
22:24 Large Ulerens5656
22:05 3dc
21:53 Frank G
21:42 Anomalous Sources
21:14 bbrewer126









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com