Article

2010-04-08 Home Front: Politix

Rep. Wasserman Schultz Insists Health Care Law Doesn't Require Individuals to Buy Insurance

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2010-04-08 15:15|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 Lying,
Hasn't read the law,
Both of the above.

Posted by JohnQC 2010-04-08 17:43|| 2010-04-08 17:43|| Front Page Top

#2 I cannot wait until the SCOTUS asks counsel to explain this provision:

"You have a choice of _________________ with affordable _______, or paying an assessment that will offset the burden you place on other ~~insured~~ Americans and taxpayers by not being ____________."

Fill in the blanks with any purchase requirement - a car, a toothpick, an umbrella, a bowling ball, a new shirt.

If the Rep. wants to start with kids and a house as a comparison, where does the constitution stop?

It will be a fun case to watch.

Posted by Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division 2010-04-08 18:13|| 2010-04-08 18:13|| Front Page Top

#3 Another member of "The Voters Are Idiots Club"...

Posted by tu3031 2010-04-08 18:29|| 2010-04-08 18:29|| Front Page Top

23:55 CrazyFool
23:32 Alaska Paul
22:39 SteveS
22:05 john frum
21:48 trailing wife
21:45 KBK
21:42 CrazyFool
21:42 BlackBart
21:32 Mike
21:31 Barbara Skolaut
21:28 Barbara Skolaut
21:18 swksvolFF
21:10 Barbara Skolaut
21:01 Pappy
20:58 Frank G
20:52 Frank G
20:47 ed
20:43 Pappy
20:43 Frank G
20:42 Pappy
20:38 phil_b
20:30 Frank G
20:30 Nimble Spemble
20:20 phil_b