Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/19/2004 View Tue 05/18/2004 View Mon 05/17/2004 View Sun 05/16/2004 View Sat 05/15/2004 View Fri 05/14/2004 View Thu 05/13/2004
1
2004-05-19 Iraq-Jordan
Hitchens on Seymour Hersh's theory
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dragon Fly 2004-05-19 08:14|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I asked myself then, and I repeat the question now: Would the antiwar camp have approved the measures necessary to ensure those goals? If they will the end, will they will the means?

Without slurring Michael Moore again, though he needs it, I answer : FAT CHANCE.
Posted by BigEd 2004-05-19 12:26:02 PM||   2004-05-19 12:26:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 I often hear anti-war robots spout about how we should have gone full bore into Afganistan and goten Binny. Whenever I hear that I ask, what if he wasn't in Afganistan any longer? What if he took off to Iran before 911. Would you then want to go full bore into Iran?

Smoke, pure smoke.
Posted by Lucky 2004-05-19 12:36:04 PM||   2004-05-19 12:36:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 I asked myself then, and I repeat the question now: Would the antiwar camp have approved the measures necessary to ensure those goals? If they will the end, will they will the means?

We were attacked, of course!
Posted by EndALLCONS 2004-09-01 11:13:58 AM||   2004-09-01 11:13:58 AM|| Front Page Top

11:13 EndALLCONS
03:02 Anonymous4979
08:09 B
07:28 B
04:02 Super Hose
03:59 Super Hose
02:01 rex
01:16 Tresho
01:03 Tresho
00:47 ed
23:55 Phil B
23:49 Barbara Skolaut
23:35 RWV
23:30 RWV
23:29 Zenster
23:23 A Jackson
23:21 Dog Bites Trolls
23:19 RWV
23:18 Frank G
23:15 Anonymoose
23:15 Barbara Skolaut
23:13 RWV
23:13 Phil B
23:12 Alaska Paul









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com