Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 06/23/2004 View Tue 06/22/2004 View Mon 06/21/2004 View Sun 06/20/2004 View Sat 06/19/2004 View Fri 06/18/2004 View Thu 06/17/2004
1
2004-06-23 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Mike Sylwester Answers His Critics
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-06-23 6:43:05 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 good vibes you to mike! :)
Posted by muck4doo 2004-06-23 6:59:48 PM|| [http://meatismurder.blogspot.com/]  2004-06-23 6:59:48 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Frankly Mike... Huh?
You have a zen like pompouslnisty,
but hell, who cares?

Posted by Shipman 2004-06-23 7:41:57 PM||   2004-06-23 7:41:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 But I mean that in a colorful and cool vibe way,
very cool vibe, vibelike, way kool, not that I don't know cool, that's cool.

How you like that Mr. Lucky?
Posted by Shipman 2004-06-23 7:43:51 PM||   2004-06-23 7:43:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 I think your mother picked a good name.
Posted by JerseyMike 2004-06-23 7:45:06 PM||   2004-06-23 7:45:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 I thought you talked the talk.

I was on that side of things, first your stuff, then CI. Young man's game for those things, especially HUMINT. I ended up on the electronic side of things and prefer it now, although I do miss operating. (Like the old racehorse who is too old to be competitive, but still feels the urge to run).
Posted by OldSpook 2004-06-23 9:30:04 PM||   2004-06-23 9:30:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Thanks for the comments, Mr. Sylwester. Although we still have some philosophical differences, it was illuminating. I'll keep your remarks in mind whenever I review your postings.
Posted by Pappy 2004-06-23 10:23:05 PM||   2004-06-23 10:23:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Thanks for your service, Mike, but I don't believe your stated motives. Why? Well...

You buy into the media lies about Abu Ghraib way too often. You ignore the documented facts too often. Your editing is way too convenient. Oh, and your attack on badanov was pathetic, dishonest, and uncalled for.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-06-23 10:33:55 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2004-06-23 10:33:55 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Ole Spook, ITC?
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2004-06-23 10:41:44 PM||   2004-06-23 10:41:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 OK, Mike, but...frankly, these IslamoNazi bastards are trying to kill us and if our interrogators need to use their discretion and get tough with prisoners, I'm all for any and all methods of persuasion that would get them to talk to SAVE LIVES.
Quite honestly, I don't want to know the details about how we interrogate the WOT detainees.
This is WAR and it's clear that the Enemy doesn't play nice.
Further, I trust my fellow Americans--particularly our soldiers--to be decent people who won't abuse their responsibilities.
And I've yet to see badanov say anything he deserved a flaming for...
I'll be honest--you seem to be coming from an extremely Liberal Democratic position on many issues and that's not a good thing in my book.
Posted by Jen  2004-06-23 10:48:01 PM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com]  2004-06-23 10:48:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 I missed this on the first reading:

We thus encourage more opponents to stop fighting, to surrender, to accept peaceful resolution, and to treat our own soldiers accordingly.

Are you really this stupid?

We could waft captives into an earthly version of their paradise, and when our soldiers fall into jihadi hands they'll STILL abuse them and eventually kill them. They really don't care how we treat their people -- hell, I bet they consider the treatment we do give their people proof that we're soft -- and only mention it to make points with the weak-minded in the West.

The reality is that the Geneva Conventions exempt some people for a reason: it is much more humane to deal with those people harshly and quickly. If we treat terrorists as if they're entitled to the GC protections, then we're making a joke out of the entire idea.

We're not fighting an Army, Mike, we're fighting a mob of serial killers. They're not slitting throats because the thugs in Gitmo aren't getting their Red Cross packages.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-06-23 11:00:03 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2004-06-23 11:00:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Hmmm, interrogation? First of all, the President should stand by his Constitutional powers, and tell the legislature and the judiciary to butt out of his duty to execute his office and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” and to act as “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States.” U.S. Const. Art. II. Those presidential powers include the authority to tell the armed forces how, and when to interrogate, and for how long. If others in government don't like what he does, they can try to impeach him -- that is their sole check on his presidential power. The current congressional ruminating in public over these kinds of matters is a traitorous disclosure of aid and comfort to the enemy, because the disclosure can and will be used by them. Hey Congress, STFU!

On the other hand, I would be highly suspect of any information gained by intimidating the adversary. The subject should speak, not the fear. ‘Nuff said.
Posted by cingold 2004-06-23 11:07:37 PM||   2004-06-23 11:07:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 
We're not fighting an Army, Mike, we're fighting a mob of serial killers.

We're fighting a variety of people. Some of them we cannot influence, but some we can. Don't let the worst of our opponents drag us down to their level. Instead, try to pull the best of our opponents up to our level.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-06-24 12:09:52 AM||   2004-06-24 12:09:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 
If others in government don't like what he does, they can try to impeach him -- that is their sole check on his presidential power.

Another check is criticism.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-06-24 12:12:50 AM||   2004-06-24 12:12:50 AM|| Front Page Top

08:04 Arijit
07:29 Anonymous5555
16:09 Anonymous5483
12:56 Anonymous5478
14:43 Sam
14:31 Jen
11:20 Aris Katsaris
11:05 Frank G
10:45 therien
09:11 TerrorHunter4Ever
08:25 Mitch H.
08:16 Aris Katsaris
05:20 someone
05:14 someone
02:36 therien
01:22 Jen
01:03 rex
00:54 ex-lib
00:49 Jen
00:43 rex
00:36 CrazyFool
00:33 Jen
00:25 rex
00:19 Jen









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com