Article

2005-03-04 Terror Networks & Islam

Interview with Schanzer on al-Qaeda's army

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-03-04 12:10:46 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I haven't finished the whole article yet, but "If al-Shamari was telling the truth, Saddam Hussein may not have had a close relationship with al-Qaedaâs top leaders, but he likely had a close relationship with some of al-Qaedaâs lesser known lieutenants and affiliates." Would this mean that it NOW is OK to invade Iraq on the 9/11 connections? Or is this STILL not enough of a connection? Does this convince even one LLL that Saddam supported anti-US terror?

Posted by Bobby 2005-03-04 9:42:31 AM|| 2005-03-04 9:42:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Robert, Robert, Robert,

Don't you know arguing with LLLs is pointless? Even if you had a photo of Sadaam and Osama shaking hands, it wouldn't change their minds a bit. They'd move the goalposts and say the meeting of Osama and Sadaam was further proof of the racist, sexist, homophobic, global-warming, patriarichal evil of the capitalist stooge United States.

LLLs are about feelings, not facts.

Posted by Dreadnought 2005-03-04 11:58:56 AM|| 2005-03-04 11:58:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Thank you, Dread. I ... um .... forgot.

Posted by Bobby 2005-03-04 5:08:44 PM|| 2005-03-04 5:08:44 PM|| Front Page Top

04:14 Iwillrapeyourmother
00:01 Sobiesky
23:59 CrazyFool
23:52 DMFD
23:45 Alaska Paul
23:40 Alaska Paul
23:36 Phil Fraering
23:36 BH
23:34 BH
23:23 Zhang Fei
23:10 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:07 Bomb-a-rama
22:58 JP
22:58 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:46 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:44 CrazyFool
22:42 Sobiesky
22:33 Classical_Liberal
22:13 CrazyFool
22:11 CrazyFool
22:08 JosephMendiola
22:02 Sheik Abu Bin Ali Al-Yahood
21:58 Bomb-a-rama
21:49 JosephMendiola