Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/12/2005 View Mon 07/11/2005 View Sun 07/10/2005 View Sat 07/09/2005 View Fri 07/08/2005 View Thu 07/07/2005 View Wed 07/06/2005
1
2005-07-12 Home Front: WoT
"American Hiroshima"
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2005-07-12 00:11|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 In spite of his good points - like his support of Bnai Br'th - Joe Farah is a moon howler. I remember his 2-bit Y2K pseudo-prophecies that could have got him committed.

Both WND and the Muslim menace make a good case for taxing the clergy.
Posted by Vlad the Muslim Impaler 2005-07-12 02:54||   2005-07-12 02:54|| Front Page Top

#2 More PC Left-speak for taking out, wiping out Dubya, his Admin., and the GOP-Right and the Congress. Impeachment of Dubya + International Quagmire(s) + Tacnuke Wars + new 9-11's ....@ = POTUS Hillary and USA under Global Socialism and OWG. Impeachment, Assassination, andor casualty-intens anti-US Nuke War(s)- the USSA/USR must return to the isolationism of yesteryears so America's first female and second Commie POTUS can be a prim-and-proper modern Socialist Woman and achieve Media-alleged "everything" while doing nothing.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2005-07-12 05:06||   2005-07-12 05:06|| Front Page Top

#3 He seems to be using the panic button on this border issue. Believe me I would love to se a 2000 mile long wall or something, but this was a little over the top. To say al qaida has from 12 to 70 nukes is a bold statement. If they had one nuke they would have used it already, methinks.
Posted by Gleretch Glumble9876 2005-07-12 06:17||   2005-07-12 06:17|| Front Page Top

#4 To say al qaida has from 12 to 70 nukes is a bold statement.

Yeah, "bold" is one way to describe it. Another would be "crazier than a sh#t-house rat".
Posted by docob 2005-07-12 08:50||   2005-07-12 08:50|| Front Page Top

#5 How do people like Farah and Steve Qualye and Stratfor find anyone dense enough to pay money for stuff like this?
Posted by Mike 2005-07-12 09:48||   2005-07-12 09:48|| Front Page Top

#6 The Al Queda has backpack nukes story has been circulating on the internet since Sept 12. Only a moron would still give it credence even if rewrapped and reheated somewhat.

One does not just get a dozen nukes and sit on them while your enemy is rolling up your operations all over the place. If you got 'em, you use 'em. And despite Al Queda's hate for the US it would be a lot easier to use one in Europe, a fact that will probably rapidly change after the London Attacks.
Posted by rjschwarz">rjschwarz  2005-07-12 11:31||   2005-07-12 11:31|| Front Page Top

#7 How do people like Farah and Steve Qualye and Stratfor find anyone dense enough to pay money for stuff like this?

Well, I suspect they get a lot of free advertising from the conspiracy people. You know, the same people who think it's a conspiracy that the government hasn't stopped _everything_, but who would also be disturbed if the government started arresting people for "learning to fly while Arab."

A strange contradiction, if you ask me.
Posted by Phil Fraering 2005-07-12 23:36|| http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com]">[http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com]  2005-07-12 23:36|| Front Page Top

13:12 play poker
23:58 Super Hose
23:55 Sherry
23:52 Frank G
23:45 Super Hose
23:41 Atomic Conspiracy
23:36 Phil Fraering
23:33 Super Hose
23:32 anymouse
23:29 Super Hose
23:28 anymouse
23:26 trailing wife
23:25 Old Patriot
23:24 Sock Puppet 0’ Doom
23:22 Super Hose
23:21 trailing wife
23:19 Mike Kozlowski
23:16 Super Hose
23:14 Phil Fraering
23:09 Barbara Skolaut
23:07 Super Hose
23:00 ed
23:00 whitecollar redneck
22:59 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com