Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 12/13/2005 View Mon 12/12/2005 View Sun 12/11/2005 View Sat 12/10/2005 View Fri 12/09/2005 View Thu 12/08/2005 View Wed 12/07/2005
1
2005-12-13 Europe
EU Official Calls for End to Death Penalty
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2005-12-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Bravo, Fred. Excellent commentary.
Posted by .com 2005-12-13 01:30||   2005-12-13 01:30|| Front Page Top

#2 Borrell said the United States is the only democratic state that makes "widespread use" of the death penalty

Not true. There are a number of democracies that use the death penalty on a regular basis. In SEA, Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia come to mind. Unless of course you want to argue that the population has to be predominately white to count as a real democracy.
Posted by phil_b">phil_b  2005-12-13 02:19||   2005-12-13 02:19|| Front Page Top

#3 It'd be our duty to convince the Euros to reinstate it on principles of simple justice and of public safety.

Indeed, the comparative murder rates of Europe and the United States, show how much the death penalty affects public safety.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 03:44||   2005-12-13 03:44|| Front Page Top

#4 Hah, wotta laugh. You're that little greek wimp, right? You left off the *sneer*, sonny.

Y'know, you're right, we're some bloody mean motherfuckers. We don' wag fingers, we bite 'em off. I have the complete set, myself.

Funny thing is that if we wanted anything you had, junior, we'd just take it. You're unarmed and unmanned - which is to say there's not a man among the lot of you. The neighborhood pussy 'round here would live fat off your kind. Safe as a baby - as long as he didn't turn his back to you.

The down side is you don't have anything we'd want. We have standards that go well beyond posturing and preening and simpering.

*sneer*

LOL
Posted by Huputch Gruling6514 2005-12-13 06:31||   2005-12-13 06:31|| Front Page Top

#5 In 2004, according to the human rights group Amnesty International, executions were carried out in 25 nations. In that year, 97 percent of all executions were performed in just four countries: China, Iran, Vietnam and the U.S.

THE BIG LIE!



So as to distort pwerceptions, to make us look like barbarians, this piece of Euroshit does not say that of the 97% of the 3800 executions in the world, 3400 were done by the Chinese.

This sorry excuse for a human being (Is he one?) should have said, "90% of the executions were done by the Chinese, 4% by Amadisnuts' Magic Mullahs in Iran, and 6% by everyone else..."

But of course, that is if he had any functioning brain cells. However, Josep Borrell, who will change his mind in his last milliseconds of life after coming to South Central L.A., and getting held up.... When he is dying agonizingly of a decapitating shotgun blast from a Crips Gangbanger, he will have that last epipheny.

But that is unlikely as his type doesn't want to soil his hands and deal with the real world like Mr. Owens, or the Yang family...

He has had, of course, like many of his type, probably certain parts of his brain tied off from any blood supply.

"This way, I don't have to be sympathetic to any victims of 'crime', only those poor men who were denied cookies and milk as a 7 year old, and had to take out their rage on a random target. You must understand their anguish. Victims aren't important, after all they are already dead."
Posted by BigEd 2005-12-13 07:07||   2005-12-13 07:07|| Front Page Top

#6 Mention should be made of the Japanese technique.

You are sentenced to die at an unannounced time over the course of a year. That is, without public notice, on any given day in a year, you will be executed.

Only after you have been executed is the public informed, and your body released to your family.

Since appeals are incredibly rare in Japan, and almost never successful, death means death.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-12-13 09:28||   2005-12-13 09:28|| Front Page Top

#7 Why the European Parliament president feels compelled to tell Americans how to deal with first degree murderers is beyond me. I would think that the European Parliament has enough problems right now that he could keep busy with his official business.

"Tookie" will not be harming anyone else, Aris. I assure you that the American public is safe from him. You, however, are free to continue to inflict pain and suffering. After the Athens bomber gets a hefty death toll and is finally apprehended, we'll see if you are inclined to house and feed him for the next sixty years.

Did it ever occur to you that we still have the death penalty in some states because the majority of the citizens of those states still approve of it? Just as they still disapprove of gay marriage? Who are you and Josep Borrell to expect that your values should be universal values? And when the Turkish military starts pouring over your borders, will you be shooting at them with bullets or blanks?

This thread will be Arisified in 5, 4, 3, 2...
Posted by Darrell 2005-12-13 10:16||   2005-12-13 10:16|| Front Page Top

#8 Aris, I agree that capital punishment doesn't deter murder, but that is because of the way it is carried out. Most convicted mureders die of natural causes (old age) before the appeals process has run it's course. For those that poo poo that public punishment doesn't deter crime I piont to that shining examples of Saudi Arabia and Singapore. Very harsh public punishment and very low crime rates. We have relatively light punishments and crime rates skyrocket. It wasn't until many states passed three-strikes laws that crime rates started to fall.
Posted by Cyber Sarge">Cyber Sarge  2005-12-13 10:47||   2005-12-13 10:47|| Front Page Top

#9 Let's remember that in many Europen countries Marc Dutroux would be released, free to commit more rapes and murders since not only they don't have death penalty, they also consider life sentences as inhuman and in fact would not extradite a suspect if he could be sentenced to life.

For those who don't remember Marc Dutroux is that Belgian who had a business in child porn (1) who rapted, raped and killed early teen and preteen girls. The points is that for he was not a (perhaps curable) maniac. For him it was a business, a highly lucrative business and he will do it again the very same day he is released. And that is precisely what Aris and those oh so human abolitionists would do: release him and let his victims pay the price of abolitionts's feel goodism.

Society has duties toward the citizens, and specially toward the children. One of them is protecting them and if that implies executing criminals, so be it.
Posted by JFM">JFM  2005-12-13 10:56||   2005-12-13 10:56|| Front Page Top

#10 LOL HG6514! bravo!
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-12-13 11:05||   2005-12-13 11:05|| Front Page Top

#11 I am personally against the death penalty, but I find it obnoxious that Europeans are so against executing the guilty, but have no problem euthanizing the innocent sick and elderly.
Posted by DoDo 2005-12-13 12:03||   2005-12-13 12:03|| Front Page Top

#12 Since Josep Borrell is Spanish let me tell two interesting histories about Spain's judicial system.

The first one is about De Juana Chaos a Basque terrorist involved in more than 20 murders. He was sentenced to thousands of years. He is totally unrepentant: he is a strong proponent of alliance of ETA with Al Quaida and he has told about the pleasure he feels when he sees the faces diformed by the pain of families at funerals. However the judge Pedraz (that one who tries to have US servericemen arrested) decreed his liberation after only 18 years. Less than one for every murder. A man who is willing to kill, or plan killings, and help mass murders and who takes pleasure in it. How is that possible? First of all law provides that no sentence could go beyond thirty years, second of all because getting university degrees also provided a reduction (BTW: the degrees were false) and that is how Pedraz could disregard the dangerosity of de Juana Chaos and release him. Fortunately, the order was appealed on the basis that de Juana Chaos had continued his activities while in prison. However a couple months later there was a woman as blood thirsty and as ready to kill again as De Juana Chaos who was released: this time the activity who allowed the reduction of her sentence was... playing indoor-soccer. May God care about her and De Juana's future victims because the Spanish lawmakers and judges will not.

The second story is about Ramon Baglieto. When he was in his twenties he saved the life of Basque baby. Nineteen years later, he was murdered in cold blood by the guy he had saved who in the interim had become a terrorist. After purging a pretty short sentence the terrorist has rented a shop... in the same building where lives the widow of his victim (BTW: it is not hazard since the shop sells glass for windows and he is carpenter ie not qualified) and is harrassing her in order to force her to leave it. No reaction of the Zapaterist authorities.

That is the Spanish judicial system. These are the people who are lecturing America about his legal system.
Posted by JFM">JFM  2005-12-13 12:13||   2005-12-13 12:13|| Front Page Top

#13 European Parliament president Josep Borrell called on the 76 countries still allowing the death penalty to respect the right to life and end the practice of capital punishment.

There's only one thing to say about this: "Mind your own damned business."
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-12-13 12:15||   2005-12-13 12:15|| Front Page Top

#14 I find it ironic that JB uses the phrase "to respect the right to life " in respect to murderers.

Is he anti-abortion? Sounds like it.
Posted by AlanC">AlanC  2005-12-13 12:22||   2005-12-13 12:22|| Front Page Top

#15 
European Parliament president Josep Borrell called on the 76 countries still allowing the death penalty ...
Borrell said the United States is the only democratic state that makes "widespread use" of the death penalty...

1/76 or 1.3%. The EU better look to see why there are so little democtatic countries in the UN.
And do something about it!

Posted by SwissTex 2005-12-13 12:38||   2005-12-13 12:38|| Front Page Top

#16 Interesting trivia from today's Seattle area: at the 0530 KMPS news there was ONE WHOLE SENTENCE devoted to 'tookie's(ptui!) execution. At 0600 the story was dropped and instead three sentences were devoted to a Bellvue- area ( adjacent to Seattle city) panty thief who had been repeatedly breaking into the same house and stealing these things. Guess tookie (ptui!) ain't so everlasting! BTW: EU: STFU!
Posted by USN, ret. 2005-12-13 14:48||   2005-12-13 14:48|| Front Page Top

#17 First of all I'll utterly ignore Huputch Gruling6514 (and thus by extension Frank G.) since they didn't raise any points at all. I'll only say that usually one would have to *hire* opponents such as them, just to create strawmen of macho imbecility. That they make their appearance free of charge... wow. Such generosity, guys. Thank ya.

Now, moving on to the *sentient* debaters:

This thread will be Arisified in 5, 4, 3, 2...

Can you advise me on how to answer the points raised, without committing the sin of Arisification?

"After the Athens bomber gets a hefty death toll and is finally apprehended, we'll see if you are inclined to house and feed him for the next sixty years.

Death penalty (including the money for appeals & so forth) costs more than housing and feeding the prisoner in question for life. So the issue of money wasted is a point *against* the death penalty.

(there's a sidepoint I could dispute here, regarding the role of terrorism in the countries of the deeply democratic West vs its role in a country which is in the pocket of Russia, but it's not relevant to the issue of the death penalty, and so I'll let it pass)

Did it ever occur to you that we still have the death penalty in some states because the majority of the citizens of those states still approve of it? Just as they still disapprove of gay marriage?

Yes, ofcourse. I never dispute your democracy on the issue of these points.

That's why people with firm convictions try to do their parts on changing your *opinions* over these issues, so that eventually a new majority will be formed which will both ban death penalty and permit same-sex marriages.

Some of course go to e.g. the judicial path, and feel that it's the courts' right and obligation to establish rules that go beyond the right of democratic majorities to alter. "Judicial activism" I believe you call it? I think that both these attitudes have merit in different situations -- and the fact that your constitution allows them both, seems to indicate that its writers thought likewise.

Either way, one thing that the fact of democracy definitely doesn't forbid is having people of other nations try to convince you that you are damn wrong. Democracy doesn't determine once-and-for-all which ideas are right and which must be condemned to the abyss. Democracy is a process where even unpopular ideas have a say.

Who are you and Josep Borrell to expect that your values should be universal values?

I'm a moral absolutist. That means that if a value (inside the state's purview) isn't universal, it's not a value at all, it's merely a personal preference (in which case it should probably not be in the purview of the state at all).

Democracy isn't the process that necessarily determines the *best* value, it's merely the arbiting mechanism that we civilised people have determined to use to solve our disputes. Your shouts of "democracy" doesn't make our disagreement go away -- it merely means that as long as you are with the majority your view will hold sway: and it also means that I will keep on trying to make your majority eventually become a minority.

Which (if current trends continue) is unlikely in regards to the death penalty, but is becoming e.g. ever more likely with the same-sex marriage issue.

It wasn't until many states passed three-strikes laws that crime rates started to fall.

Actually I read that the fall of the crime rates seems very strongly connected with the spread of abortion across the United States -- to quote from
Orson Scott Card "The fall in crime rates marches in lockstep with legalized abortion fifteen to twenty years before." and "1973 wasn't the beginning of legal abortions in the United States. There were states that legalized abortion several years earlier. And guess what? In those states, the crime rate began to fall exactly that number of years earlier. "

Bomb-a-rama> "Mind your own damned business."

During a war where (supposedly) America is trying to export its values to the Middle-east, thinking said values universal (and I'll agree with that), "Mind your own damned business" is the one thing you can damn well NOT say. You may disagree with which values to try to export, you may disagree about whether fellow democracies should be pressured and to which extent, but the one thing you can absolutely NOT say and hold any shred of self-consistency is "Mind your own damned business".

We'll either export a set of values or we won't. Perhaps America only wants to export democracy, gender equality, and capitalism, while Europe want to export democracy, gender equality, and lack of the death penalty, but either way "Minding your own damned business" is what you ain't doing either.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 15:04||   2005-12-13 15:04|| Front Page Top

#18 Aris - with regard to your last statement, 3000 people in NY made it our business. If you mean that we should not be trying to give the Muslim world another way, I entirely agree. After the next Muslim outrage, we should just retaliate massively. No interference, just retaliation.

There, feel better?
Posted by SR-71">SR-71  2005-12-13 15:14||   2005-12-13 15:14|| Front Page Top

#19 Aris, we might listen to you a bit more if Europe wasn't in the sad state it is. The perception here is that Europeans see themselves and their institutions as superior to the US and our institutions. We see our institutions, not ourselves, as superior to Europen ones. we have a vibrant economy and most of Europe does not. I can go from where I live in Tennessee to Boston and people are pretty much the same. You can go from Greece to Germany and very little is the same. I do not believe a European Constitution will ever work because of the differences in all the members. Europeans will not put European identity above their individual countries. For the most part here in the US we put Country first and State second.I just don't see anything similar happening in Europe.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2005-12-13 15:19||   2005-12-13 15:19|| Front Page Top

#20 Well said, Deacon!
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2005-12-13 15:25|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]  2005-12-13 15:25|| Front Page Top

#21 Aris

I a soooooo disappointed you didn't reply to my posts despite the fact I mentionned your name in one of them.

And BTW, I were you, I would spend more energy to fighting death penalty in the Netherlads were thousands of elders and children are put to death every year without their consent or the consent of their family. They call it euthanasia, but in my place they call it murder and it is not mercy what motivates them but cutting costs for Social Security.
Posted by JFM">JFM  2005-12-13 15:28||   2005-12-13 15:28|| Front Page Top

#22 JFM is hot today!
Posted by Clesh Sneling7866 2005-12-13 15:31||   2005-12-13 15:31|| Front Page Top

#23 Aris - with regard to your last statement, 3000 people in NY made it our business.

Don't be absurd, Iraq and the Middle-east is merely the most emphatical example, but US is supposedly promoting democratic and other western values (e.g. freedom of religion) around the world, ain't ya?

If you mean that we should not be trying to give the Muslim world another way, I entirely agree.

No, I meant exactly what I said, that we should be each trying to export our values like hell. Since America and the European nations are all democratic, we won't need to *bomb* each other to export said values, we can just fight it out with words, vocally tear into each other. We'll call you barbarians, you'll call us wimps. Isn't it nifty?

Aris, we might listen to you a bit more if Europe wasn't in the sad state it is.

In the issue of murder rates, Europe is in a much *much* better situation than America. Perhaps you should seek to emulate our strong points, even if we should try to emulate yours?

we have a vibrant economy and most of Europe does not.

Is that fact related to the murder rates?

(It's *possible*, I'll grant you that. It's possible that the socialdemocracy that has caused partial stagnation in the European democracy also provides the security net that causes less crime to go murderous -- possible but highly uncertain ofcourse.)

Either way I doubt you claim that abolishing the death penalty will cause your economy to stagnate. You'll note, I hope, that I've NEVER argued that your *economy* should emulate the European one.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 15:32||   2005-12-13 15:32|| Front Page Top

#24 And BTW, I were you, I would spend more energy to fighting death penalty in the Netherlads were thousands of elders and children are put to death every year without their consent or the consent of their family.

JFM, I don't speak Dutch. I do speak English.

I a soooooo disappointed you didn't reply to my posts despite the fact I mentionned your name in one of them.

Well, I disagree with releasing murderers and especially repeat murderers. Does that answer your posts fully?

I also think that the burden of the possibility of wrongly executing the innocent more than outweighs the burden of the possibility of a murderer escaping to kill again. I'm willing to take up the guilt of an escaped convict's crimes, if you are willing to take up the guilt for wrongful executions.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 15:39||   2005-12-13 15:39|| Front Page Top

#25 I'm willing to take up the guilt of an escaped convict's crimes

Revered one, thank you so much for taking so many potenial sins on your broad shoulders. The potential victims will be so relieved to know of your assumption of guilt.
Posted by Cloluque Glarong5888 2005-12-13 15:45||   2005-12-13 15:45|| Front Page Top

#26 The executed innocent will be so relieved to know you don't give a damn.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 15:52||   2005-12-13 15:52|| Front Page Top

#27 name him
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-12-13 15:55||   2005-12-13 15:55|| Front Page Top

#28 Aris, I didn't mean to infer that our economy is tied to the murder rate. it is relatively high here in mostly inner city areas due, in my opinion, to drug turf wars. Nor do I believe if we abolished the death penelty would our economy collapse. Don't be absurd. I do agree we shouldn't be at cross purposes with each other as regards exporting our shared values. You seem to believe Europe has moral superiority because the death penalty has been outlawed. There are those here who would agree and tose who disagree. personally I think the death penalty should be very rare. Life is sacred but those persons to whom life is not sacred and take others lives for their own gratification I believe they should forfeit their own life. will it bring back the dead victims? No. Tookie williams murdered 4 people because he could. Therefore, his own life should be forfeit.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2005-12-13 15:56||   2005-12-13 15:56|| Front Page Top

#29 at least since the advent of DNA testing....google away
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-12-13 15:56||   2005-12-13 15:56|| Front Page Top

#30 The executed innocent will be so relieved to know you don't give a damn.

As will the victims be relieved to know you don't give a damn. What's the ratio of victims to innocents executed? Greater than 1 I'll bet. So you'd rather see more innocents die, eh?
Posted by Cloluque Glarong5888 2005-12-13 16:00||   2005-12-13 16:00|| Front Page Top

#31 One has to admit that the subtleties of American Federalism, involving the distribution of REAL power between states and the Federal government, kinda throws the Euros.

As soon as enough states have decided that they don't want a death penalty, they'll propose an Amendment to the Constitution, vote it into force by the required margin, and that would be that. Such an amendment would state that there was an actual sea-change in the attitude of the American people, not in 5 judges' minds who would impose their beliefs on 300 million plus people by judicial fiat.

Then again, seeing who's doing the criticising, doing ANYTHING and EVERYTHING in the EU by fiat, judicial or administrative, by unelected officials, is just fine with them. Indeed, if we abandoned the death penalty in a manner that truly reflected the american people's will, it would seem to me that the EU officials would be a bit displeased, although I am sure they would show that displeasure amongst themselves in private.

Indeed

He's not sitting out



Posted by Ptah">Ptah  2005-12-13 16:04|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2005-12-13 16:04|| Front Page Top

#32 at least since the advent of DNA testing....google away

So in essense you are asking me "prove innocent those whom current scientific knowledge shows to be guilty".

Sorry, I won't play your game using your arbitrary rules. Instead, I'll tell you that your example proves my very point: With the advent of DNA testing, lots of death row inmates were proven innocent. Namely, new technology can prove someone innocent that all the previous knowhow in the world had shown guilty. This happened with fingerprint identification, and again with DNA identification, and who knows what other means will be discovered in the future, proving innocent those that are *currently* believed guilty.

Not all the current death penalty cases use DNA either -- in some cases there's no relevant DNA to be matched with or against.

Or were you perhaps opposed to the death penalty *before* DNA testing came around? Are you *now* opposed to death penalty being used in cases where no DNA evidence exists?
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 16:09||   2005-12-13 16:09|| Front Page Top

#33 Greater than 1 I'll bet.

And I'm willing to bet the opposite, oh anonymous brave one. So in my view, it's you who are willing to murder innocents, just in order to satisfy your desire for revenge against the guilty. The fact that how what happened with the advent of DNA testing doesn't phaze you at all, is all proof to the same that I need. People in death-row proven to be innocent! None of you seems to feel that this meant the system was thoroughly broken: and nobody knows *how* broken it may still be, because no one has a way of knowing.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 16:15||   2005-12-13 16:15|| Front Page Top

#34 America - you must be proven guilty - we don't have to prove innocent. Wrong laws, AK. I was for the death penalty, and with the advent of DNA testing, the "innocent man" argument is blown away like the fluff it is. You don't get the death penalty without overwhelming proof. I just wish the appeals happened quicker and the executions took less than 5 yrs from trial. Buh bye!
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-12-13 16:17||   2005-12-13 16:17|| Front Page Top

#35 Perhaps America only wants to export democracy, gender equality, and capitalism, while Europe want to export democracy, gender equality, and lack of the death penalty, but either way "Minding your own damned business" is what you ain't doing either.

Well it's OUR justice system, not yours. You don't have the death penalty? Fine. We do. Get over it.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-12-13 16:26||   2005-12-13 16:26|| Front Page Top

#36 You don't get the death penalty without overwhelming proof.

That same overwhelming proof that was proven to be utter bullshit when the DNA testing overturned conviction after conviction?

Congrats. If the DNA testing had *confirmed* all those convictions, then you might have had a point about that "overwhelming proof".

But the test arrived, and the American judicial system flunked it. Congrats again.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 16:27||   2005-12-13 16:27|| Front Page Top

#37 Aris, come on now. The United States does not have the highest murder rate in the world.

We rank about #24. Far below #5 Russia, #7 Estonia, #8 Latvia, #9 Lithuania, #10 Belarus, #11 Ukraine, #15 Moldova, #19 Costa Rica (a shocker there, I must admit), and #20 Poland.

We're high in property crimes, but not as high as #3 Italy, or #4 Great Britain. Canada, peaceful, happy land to the north, had more property crimes than we did.

But, quite frankly, women are safer here in the States. Our rape rate doesn't compare to #2 Austria, #3 Finland, #4 Sweden, #6 the UK, #7 the Netherlands, #8 Canada, #9 Slovenia, #10 France, #11 Italy, or #12 Switzerland. We're #13, still too high, but not nearly as bad.

Assaults aren't a place for the Europeans to brag about, either. For all our supposed violent tendencies, we're ranked #11. The UK is #2 (all those soccer houligans, no doubt), #5 is Canada, #6 goes to Finland, #8 France, #9 Denmark, and #10 Belgium.

We do top the list in reported crimes, but maybe that's because we trust our cops to at least make an effort to solve them.

Notice something there in the stats, Aris? With the exception of Costa Rica and Canada, all of the countries listed above are European, many of which are EU members. And Europe is going to lecture us about crime and punishment?

I don't know....maybe if the EU had more of their criminals pushing up the daisies, they'd have our crime rates....just sayin'.
Posted by Desert Blondie 2005-12-13 16:55|| http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]">[http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2005-12-13 16:55|| Front Page Top

#38 All right, all right, Aris.

Pick any execution this year in the United States. Find one that has the possibility that an innocent man got fried by mistake. A lot of us here will give you an audience.

But, for the most part, I think you'll find that the vast majority of perps that take the long walk have criminal records as long as your arm and there's little doubt as to their guilt.
Posted by Dreadnought 2005-12-13 17:04||   2005-12-13 17:04|| Front Page Top

#39 David's Medienkritik has an interesting post on the propaganda being fed the Germans about the Tookster. I imagine it's much the same over old europe. Best to acknowledge the EU knows best and let them go headlong into their civil war. I want no part of it.
Posted by ed 2005-12-13 17:14||   2005-12-13 17:14|| Front Page Top

#40 DB, some of those stats look suspcious. They must refer to reported/paperwork filed crimes, because South Africa, where fully 1/2 the women are raped in their lifetime, is not on the list. Notice S.A. is high on the murder rate, which is harder to cover up. I would like to see the stats corrected for underreporting.
Posted by ed 2005-12-13 17:25||   2005-12-13 17:25|| Front Page Top

#41 ed, yup, it's reported/paperwork filed crimes.

I had heard those rape stats about South Africa, myself.
Posted by Desert Blondie 2005-12-13 17:40|| http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]">[http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2005-12-13 17:40|| Front Page Top

#42 Méga pantouffle,

Can you cite evidence that Greek citizens are more likely to report crimes against their person and/or property to the authorities as [ie.] U.K. citizens do?

Can you cite evidence that Greek authorities actually have/keep more accurate records of crimes against persons and/or property as [ie.] U.K. authorities do?
Posted by Red Dog 2005-12-13 17:41||   2005-12-13 17:41|| Front Page Top

#43 Canada, peaceful, happy land to the north, had more property crimes than we did.

I think you meant to say "has a higher property crime rate".

I'd like to see those stats for individual US states or cities. Chances are, there'd be nothing to brag about.
Posted by Rafael 2005-12-13 17:42||   2005-12-13 17:42|| Front Page Top

#44 Rafael, yep, you are right about some cities being friggin' war zones (Camden comes to mind...). But overall, we're safer here than we are given credit for.
Posted by Desert Blondie 2005-12-13 17:45|| http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]">[http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2005-12-13 17:45|| Front Page Top

#45 Desert Blondie> Since it was an EU official that made the statements instigating this thread, let's compare only the EU nations, shall we? 25 EU member-states in all.

Murder rates: We rank about #24. We rank about #24. Far below #5 Russia, #7 Estonia, #8 Latvia, #9 Lithuania, #10 Belarus, #11 Ukraine, #15 Moldova, #19 Costa Rica (a shocker there, I must admit), and #20 Poland.

So, where murder rates are concerned, 4 EU member-states are worse-off than you, so I guess 21 EU countries are better than you.

Property Crime victims: 3 EU member-states are worse-off than you, so I guess 22 EU member-states are better than you.

Rape rates: 8 EU states are worse than you, so I guess 17 EU states are better than you.

Assault victims: 5 EU states are worse than you, so I guess 20 EU states are better than you.

Total crimes: In that one you gave a link that went to the *total*, rather than per capita graphs, so obviously you'd have more reported crimes, since you are a bigger country than any single European one. In the "per capita" listings, Italy, UK and Malta are worse-off than you (more reported crimes) while all the rest (22 I guess) are better than you.

What I don't undestand is why you gave me those statistics in defense of the American crime rates.

On the whole however I'll also agree with ed: the problem of underreporting may exist for many of these countries/crimes. It's therefore perhaps best to stick with the murder rates, which are probably the most accurate of all (and would probably be most influenced by the death penalty one way or another anyway, and thus be more relevant to the issue at hand)
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 17:45||   2005-12-13 17:45|| Front Page Top

#46 "Méga pantouffle"

Red Dog, I don't even know what that means, but if you are referring to me, do me the courtesy of addressing me by name, same as I do you. It's basic manners.

In this thread (up to the recent post, where the statistics given were provided by another, not me, so it's she who'll have to vouch for them) I've been referring to the issue of *murder rates* throughout, which seem to me to be both the most accurate, and most relevant. So you're essentially asking me to defend points I've never made.
Posted by Aris Katsaris 2005-12-13 17:51||   2005-12-13 17:51|| Front Page Top

#47 Aris Katsaris about euthanasia (or more exactly muder on behalf of Social Security finances) in the Netherland.

JFM, I don't speak Dutch. I do speak English.

I don't speak Dutch either but I can't withstand the idea that a through the Europe Union I could be the countryman of such people...
Posted by JFM">JFM  2005-12-13 18:08||   2005-12-13 18:08|| Front Page Top

#48 From executing murderers, shooting disabled airline passengers, euthanasia, to African poverty... I'd say no side of the Atlantic has a claim on moral authority*.

*Vatican excepted
Posted by Rafael 2005-12-13 18:40||   2005-12-13 18:40|| Front Page Top

#49 DNA testing only overturned about a hundred death row cases, and those were old, pre-DNA-testing cases. More-recent cases and future cases will not have those problems as the technology is being applied before the trial.
Posted by Darrell 2005-12-13 19:03||   2005-12-13 19:03|| Front Page Top

#50 Aris, you speak from ignorance. Here is the 2000 international Crime Victims Survey of 17 indstrial nations.
The reason for setting up the ICVS was the inadequacy of other measures of crime across country. Figures of offences recorded by the police are problematic due to differences in the way the police define, record and count crime.
They surveyed 2000 people in each country with a 64% response rate. Greece was not surveyed, but would be lumped with Albania.

Overall victimisation
- Above 24% (victim of any crime in 1999): Australia, England and Wales, the Netherlands and Sweden
- 20%-24%: Canada, Scotland, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, France, and USA
- Under 20%: Finland, Catalonia (Spain), Switzerland, Portugal, Japan and Northern Ireland.

Car-related crime
The risk of having a car stolen was highest in England and Wales (2.6% of owners had a theft), Australia (2.1%), and France (1.9%). Japan, Switzerland, Catalonia, the USA, Finland, and the Netherlands show risks of 0.5% or less. Those in Poland, Japan, Belgium and the Netherlands were least likely to get their cars back - indicating proportionately more professional theft. Recovery rates were above 80% in Sweden, Australia, and the USA - indicating more thefts for 'joyriding'.

Burglary
The proportion of households who had a completed or attempted burglary was highest in Australia (7%), England and Wales (5%), Canada, Denmark and Belgium (all 4%).

Theft of personal property
Thefts of personal property will be heterogeneous in nature, but the highest risks were in Australia, Sweden, and Poland (about 5%-6% of people were victimised). ... Risks of pickpocketing were most common in Poland (4%). Risks were also comparatively high in Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Catalonia, and England and Wales (about 2%). As previous sweeps have found, risks were lowest outside Europe: in Japan, Canada, and the USA.

Contact crime
An overall measure of contact crime was taken as robbery, assaults with force, and sexual assaults (against women only). The highest risks were in Australia, England and Wales, Canada, Scotland and Finland: over 3% were victims. This was more than double the level in USA, Belgium, Catalonia, Portugal, and Japan (all under 2%). In Japan the risk of contact crime was especially low (0.4%).

Robbery
Robbery was comparatively uncommon in all countries. Risks were highest in 1999 in Poland (1.8%), England and Wales, and Australia (both 1.2%). By far the lowest risks were in Japan and Northern Ireland (0.1%). On average, just over a third of victims of robbery said the offender(s) carried a weapon of some sort - in most cases a knife. There was a higher than average use of weapons in the USA, Catalonia, Scotland, and Portugal. Although not very statistically robust, the data indicate that guns were used relatively more often in Catalonia and the USA.

Sexual incidents
For all countries combined, just over one per cent of women reported offensive sexual behaviour. The level was half that for sexual assaults. Women in Sweden, Finland, Australia and England and Wales were most at risk of sexual assault. Women in Japan, Northern Ireland, Poland and Portugal were least at risk.

Assaults and threats
Taking all countries together, 3.5% were victims once or more of assaults or threats in 1999. Risks were highest in Australia, Scotland, England and Wales (about 6%) and Canada (5%). Risks were lowest in Japan, Portugal, (under 1%) and Catalonia (1.5%).

Finally: Police performance
People were asked to say whether or not the police did a good job in controlling crime in their area, and whether the police were helpful. Police performance was most favourably judged in the USA and Canada. Satisfaction levels were also comparatively high in Scotland and Australia. The poorest judgements were from this in Portugal, Poland the Netherlands, Japan and Catalonia.

You can read the rest and the breakout tables at the above link.
Posted by ed 2005-12-13 19:15||   2005-12-13 19:15|| Front Page Top

#51 *scratches head*, I must be missing something: it just appears to me that Aris is not as disturbed about a serial murderer killing innocents deliberately as he (and the Euros) are about a government mistakenly killing an innocent at the end of a long and arduous process of trying to establish guilt or innocence based on a presumption of innocence. It appears to me that it doesn't matter to them WHAT is done as much as WHO does it. Which explains why the US gets more grief than Saddam Hussein, even though the latter killed far more people than the former. And why Aris begged off addressing the Dutch Euthanasia issue with a rather lame excuse.
Posted by Ptah">Ptah  2005-12-13 19:15|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2005-12-13 19:15|| Front Page Top

#52 BAh. I figured out why Aris said what he said about the euthanasia issue: he wants to make his judgment based on primary sources, and he wouldn't know how to enter a search term in Dutch to Google so he could use a translation program. Scratch my last line in the previous comment.
Posted by Ptah">Ptah  2005-12-13 19:22|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2005-12-13 19:22|| Front Page Top

#53 Rafael, you are right. Crime in the US is way overconcentrated in poor and minority city areas while most suburbs are very safe. Much of it can be traced to the drug trade and the need for territory and money drugs require. Is the solution legalization or execution of dealers? What we are currently doing isn't working.
Posted by ed 2005-12-13 19:27||   2005-12-13 19:27|| Front Page Top

#54 I feel that the death penalty if carried out in a timely manner, would make a big difference in our crime rate. The fact that we hold folks for so damn long behind bars, makes people think they'll get away with the murder. They feel it is worth the risk.
This recent deal with Tookie was just outrageous. For all of the so called movie stars pleading for him, and how he turned his life around, blah blah blah. That's just too much BS for me. He should have been terminated many years ago.
Posted by Jan 2005-12-13 19:33||   2005-12-13 19:33|| Front Page Top

#55 Greece was not surveyed, but would be lumped with Albania.

Oh dear lord. I don't think any European country can be lumped in with Albania.

The wonders of (meaningless) statistics. Liechtenstein's exports per dollar GDP is the highest in the world. Does this mean Liechtenstein is some omnipotent industrial superpower? No. Same with the crime stats.
Posted by Rafael 2005-12-13 19:35||   2005-12-13 19:35|| Front Page Top

#56 Rafael, that was a joke. I screwed up the italics. Should be: The reason for setting up the ICVS was the inadequacy of other measures of crime across country. Figures of offences recorded by the police are problematic due to differences in the way the police define, record and count crime.
They surveyed 2000 people in each country with a 64% response rate. Greece was not surveyed, but would be lumped with Albania.
Posted by ed 2005-12-13 19:42||   2005-12-13 19:42|| Front Page Top

#57 Is the solution legalization or execution of dealers?

Definitely NOT legalization. I like the Singaporean approach. Beat the guy to shit with sticks.
There wouldn't be a need for executions if prison was a scary place to be, literally. Right now, it's like a badge of honor. At the very least let's make them earn that badge. Hard time should mean hard time. Like in Portugal in Salazar's time. Cells just large enough for you to stand in, no sitting. Or one way flights to Rock Island. If you can swim back, you're free!

Or...you can have the European way...suspended sentences. You must admit Aris, Europe is waaaaay too soft on crime. It's one thing to be against the death penalty, quite another to be lackadaisical about crime. But that's what you get with socialism.
Posted by Rafael 2005-12-13 19:49||   2005-12-13 19:49|| Front Page Top

#58 Ed,
I looked over the ICVS stats at the link you provided. A few notes as to why I look at these stats with distrust:
Since I know a bit about Poland, I'll use it as an example.
Example: Percentage of homes with burglar alarms and special door locks: The survey concludes: "The main differences were that Denmark and Poland came fairly low in terms of precautions taken, although burglary risks were comparatively high." That's simply false. They probably did not take into account that people in Poland generally have double doors. The first door is usually a heavy iron door. Alarms are also common. "Grilles" on windows are (or were) common also, which the survey claims they are not.
Feelings of safety on the streets: "Those in Catalonia, Australia and Poland were most anxious about being out alone at night..." In Poland's case, this should be evaluated against the historical background. Poland under communism was particularly safe. You could count on the Police for keeping order (they did not spare the truncheon). After communism collapsed, Police powers were severely curtailed. A perception of lawlessness took hold, which continues to a lesser extent to this day.

Comparing answers to such questions is meaningless without a broader (and better) context than the survey provided. Only the raw numbers are meaningful.
Posted by Rafael 2005-12-13 20:56||   2005-12-13 20:56|| Front Page Top

#59 And the last part of this thread sums it up nicely, bringing us back to one reason it might be a good idea to continue with the death penalty, Substitute a few words about our times in Rafael's paragraph, and you have:

"You could count on the Police for keeping order (they did not spare the truncheon)...[after the LA riots] Police powers were severely curtailed. A perception of lawlessness took hold, which continues to a lesser extent to this day."

When bangers don't believe there will be a price for the murders they commit, a perception of lawlessness with impunity prevails. That is called incentive. Cyber Sarge has it right in #8.

This sentence was the ideal sentence-show the young that all the liberal hand-wringers in the world do not relieve you of the yoke of past crimes you've committed. This sentence makes clear that the sh*t he pulled is deadly serious.

And for those who maintain he was innocent and was an important force for good in gang areas-he had an opportunity to show that his loyatlies to the gang didn't come before his loyalty to the country's citizens. He declined. I am proud of the way Arnold addressed the clemency request.
Posted by jules 2 2005-12-13 21:39||   2005-12-13 21:39|| Front Page Top

#60 And the last part of this thread sums it up nicely, bringing us back to one reason it might be a good idea to continue with the death penalty, Substitute a few words about our times in Rafael's paragraph, and you have:

"You could count on the Police for keeping order (they did not spare the truncheon)...[after the LA riots] Police powers were severely curtailed. A perception of lawlessness took hold, which continues to a lesser extent to this day."

When bangers don't believe there will be a price for the murders they commit, a perception of lawlessness with impunity prevails. That is called incentive. Cyber Sarge has it right in #8.

This sentence was the ideal sentence-show the young that all the liberal hand-wringers in the world do not relieve you of the yoke of past crimes you've committed. This sentence makes clear that the sh*t he pulled is deadly serious.

And for those who maintain he was innocent and was an important force for good in gang areas-he had an opportunity to show that his loyatlies to the gang didn't come before his loyalty to the country's citizens. He declined. I am proud of the way Arnold addressed the clemency request.
Posted by jules 2 2005-12-13 21:42||   2005-12-13 21:42|| Front Page Top

#61 The great majority of crime done in this country is done by repeat offenders, the usual suspects. If the death penalty does nothing else, it certainly deters repeaters. Whats not to like about taking that type of scum out of circulation?
Posted by Besoeker 2005-12-13 21:43||   2005-12-13 21:43|| Front Page Top

#62 Postnote:

Not sure that EU sentences are ones to emulate. Imagine the maximum sentence of 30 years mentioned in the thread applied to hearty men like the one who sawed off a preteen's forearms in the US for kicks a few years back. Or 8 1/2 years for premeditated murder and cannibalism as the gent in Germany did. Europeans are none to take us to task for inappropriate punishments.
Posted by jules 2 2005-12-13 22:17||   2005-12-13 22:17|| Front Page Top

#63 Sorry, Aris, I had a social engagement to go to.

The reason I was bringing up those stats was simple. Don't play cute with the "members of the EU" vs "ones that aren't yet...give them time" distinction. You were implying that Europe has far better crime rates and last time I checked, all of those countries I listed (except for Costa Rica and Canada) were in Europe.

Considering there is a huge crime problem in your own backyard, the idea of some goofball like Borrell lecturing us on how to run a criminal justice system really irritates.

While I don't agree with the death penalty on moral grounds, looking at the stats makes me wonder if it might just be the right thing to do after all.
Posted by Desert Blondie 2005-12-13 22:54|| http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]">[http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2005-12-13 22:54|| Front Page Top

23:25 C-Low
23:07 DMFD
23:06 Bolo
23:02 DMFD
23:01 .com
22:59 Bolo
22:54 Desert Blondie
22:51 49 pan
22:44 Frank G
22:43 Frank G
22:27 Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu
22:21 Valentine
22:21 Frank G
22:17 jules 2
22:13 newc
22:12 xbalanke
21:47 Besoeker
21:43 Besoeker
21:42 jules 2
21:39 jules 2
21:38 Frank G
21:37 Besoeker
21:33 Besoeker
21:31 anon









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com