Article

2006-02-08 Terror Networks

Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism by Daniel Pipes

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-02-08 09:55|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Violence Escalates over Cartoons
http://iowahawk.typepad.com/

Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues 2006-02-08 10:55|| 2006-02-08 10:55|| Front Page Top

#2 Phooey, BrerRabbit beat me to it.

Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues 2006-02-08 10:57|| 2006-02-08 10:57|| Front Page Top

#3 If you cant say something nice dont say anything at all... didnt we learn that in Kindergarten?
No, Thumpers mom said it.

Posted by bk 2006-02-08 12:07|| 2006-02-08 12:07|| Front Page Top

#4 "Flemming Rose, the Danish editor who published the cartoons, explains that if Muslims insist that I, as a non-Muslim, should submit to their taboos, they're asking for my submission.

Well, that is the central issue, isn't it?

To put all this in an easy-access context: what if the Roman Catholic Church were insisting on censorship and submission, and Italians, Poles, Americans, and Latin Americans were rioting all over the world, burning embassies and the like? Would people/governments/newspapers/media be so quick to support them? Would anyone even stand for it? Put a frog in cold water and heat it up. Lessons from history . . .

Posted by ex-lib 2006-02-08 12:11|| 2006-02-08 12:11|| Front Page Top

#5 I'll be impressed with the Old European's opinions when they back them up with action.

Posted by Fleresh Gleash7455 2006-02-08 12:53|| 2006-02-08 12:53|| Front Page Top

#6 "Flemming Rose, the Danish editor who published the cartoons, explains that if Muslims insist that I, as a non-Muslim, should submit to their taboos, they're asking for my submission.

Of course they are; Islam means submission.

Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford 2006-02-08 13:27|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2006-02-08 13:27|| Front Page Top

#7 Strangely, as Old Europe finds its backbone, the Anglosphere quivers. So awful was the U.S. government reaction, it actually won the endorsement of the countrys leading Islamist organization, the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

If CAIR is approves of our government's actions, you know that we've gone well off of the rails. This is why I posted about Bush's faith based sandbag coming home to roost. Denigrating our constitutional right to free expression for the sake of appeasing a bunch of violent thugs is worse than stupid, it is dangerous. Our government needs to reverse its stance immediately.

Posted by Zenster 2006-02-08 17:11|| 2006-02-08 17:11|| Front Page Top

#8 Of course they are; Islam means submission.

It certainly doe. And the only choice islam is giving us is:
1) Do as I say or I will kill you
or
2) Do as I say or take you to Sharia court. Who will sentence you to death.

They don't see the hypocracy in their demands for "blasphemy" abject punishement. it's only islamic blasphemy that's objected to.

How much longer until the gen pop sees this ( the LLL never will)?

Posted by Hupomoger Clans9827 2006-02-08 22:50|| 2006-02-08 22:50|| Front Page Top

#9 DARE WORLD CARTOON MAKERS NEED MOTHER CINDY AND HER COMMIE AIRBORNE = OWG UNO PEACEKEEPING FORCES? ANN COULTER's new article belabels those Islamists whom desire unilateral appeasement andor concession vv TOON/HAIR-GATE as "Liberals" -well, so like the Lefties the Radics want and prefer asymmetric war and OWG = Global Caliphate? as fought for in the streets, elex and espec the Chambers of Congress. An important Israeli ambassador argues that IRAN must be stopped by the end of Y2006, whereas REGIMECHANGE. IRAN believes that Iran will proceed wid testing for both its missle and nuke devprogs. Others on the Net argue that Iran already has fission-type nuke bombs/devices. REMEMBER, THE BEST OF AMERICA'S ENEMIES ARE ALREADY CENTRALIZED, MILITARIZED, NUCLEARIZED, AND MARTIALIZED, whilest even the US DemoLeft in reality wants America to maintain its all-Volunteer Army at the same time its PC criticizing Bush and the Fed to expand and spend more, i.e. AMERICA LOSES WHETHER IT WAGES WAR OR NOT, AND LOSES WHETHER ACTING UNILATERALLY OR IN COALITION, .......FOR DOING TOO MUCH = DOING TOO LITTLE, etc. Dubya will be criticized regardless iff the USA has a draft or doesn't have a draft as per WW1, WW2, Korea 1, and Vietnam. Iran = North Korea > are wilfully and deliberately pushing the USA and world towards anti-USA "nuclear brinkmanship" ala my own adage "Iff America does NOT attack and wage war, America will be attacked and warred against, by any means necessary". The USDOD must be ready for SYRIA, IRAN, NORTH KOREA, and TAIWAN, and lest we fergit CUBA. THE DEMS-LEFTIRES HAVE NO PROBS WITH FASCIST AMERICA WAGING WAR(S) AS LONG AS A COMMUNIST, ANTI-SOVEREIGN, WEAK SSR AMERIKA IS THE FINAL OUTCOME.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-02-08 22:55|| 2006-02-08 22:55|| Front Page Top

23:59 2b
23:51 Barbara Skolaut
23:35 .com
23:34 GK
23:34 .com
23:30 .com
23:28 .com
23:28 .com
23:27 .com
23:25 .com
23:15 Bomb-a-rama
23:12 bigjim-ky
23:10 bigjim-ky
23:06 bigjim-ky
23:05 Bomb-a-rama
23:02 Sock Puppet O´ Doom
22:55 JosephMendiola
22:50 Hupomoger Clans9827
22:50 Zenster
22:48 Cyber Sarge
22:48 Danking70
22:41 Frank G
22:38 Hupomoger Clans9827
22:36 Frank G