Article

2006-06-28 India-Pakistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2006-06-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 ...37-5 in favour of the controversial agreement.

37-5. Apparently not as 'controversial' as the 'journalist' might hope.

Posted by PBMcL 2006-06-28 01:24|| 2006-06-28 01:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Good.

Posted by gromgoru 2006-06-28 07:02|| 2006-06-28 07:02|| Front Page Top

#3 It's controversial in Pakistan.

Posted by Fred 2006-06-28 11:24|| 2006-06-28 11:24|| Front Page Top

#4 Judging from his record, if Tom Lantos is for it, shouldn't I be against it???

Posted by 2b 2006-06-28 11:26|| 2006-06-28 11:26|| Front Page Top

#5 Lantos is the only Bay Area liberal for whom I have any respect. He understands tyranny overseas. Too bad his bleeding heart makes him support its policies at home.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-06-28 11:30|| 2006-06-28 11:30|| Front Page Top

#6 strange but interesting. Thanks.

Posted by 2b 2006-06-28 11:32|| 2006-06-28 11:32|| Front Page Top

23:52 Kristine Kid
23:52 Redneck Jim
23:48 Kristine Kid
23:43 Redneck Jim
23:43 gromgoru
23:41 gromgoru
23:38 Frank G
23:27 bigjim-ky
23:27 Anginens Threreng8133
23:26 Sherry
23:25 plainslow
23:25 bigjim-ky
23:24 Gen. John Murtha
23:22 bigjim-ky
23:22 Seafarious
23:19 bigjim-ky
23:18 Cyber Sarge
23:16 Cyber Sarge
23:15 Sherry
23:09 Broadhead6
23:07 Anonymoose
23:06 anymouse
23:02 Anonymoose
23:00 anymouse