Article

2006-12-17 Home Front: Culture Wars

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by .com 2006-12-17 06:14|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Everyone who knows Rabbi Bogomilsky says he's an affable fellow, he doesn't want to Scrooge up anybody's Christmas, he's an all-around swell guy. No doubt. But in the week when the president of Iran hosts an international (and well-attended) Holocaust Denial Convention (which simultaneously denies the last Holocaust while gleefully anticipating the next one), this rabbi thinks it's in the interests of the Jewish people to take legal action against "holiday" decorations at Seattle Airport? Sorry, it's not the airport but the plaintiff who's out of his tree. An ability to prioritize is an indispensable quality of adulthood, and a sense of proportion is a crucial ingredient of a mature society.

Agreed. Though this line of argument renders Steyn's column equally problematical. If an impending Holocaust is more important than "holiday trees" in airports it is also more important than no "holiday trees" in airports. Unless we are somehow meant to believe this fake, pagan version of Christianity is on the front line against the islamists.

Posted by Excalibur 2006-12-17 08:49|| 2006-12-17 08:49|| Front Page Top

#2 Don't quite follow that Excalibur. The Rabbi presumably has a vested interest in avoiding another holocaust. Yet, he's spending his energies trying to horn in on American traditions. In fact, his actions are creating space for muslims to do the same I might add.

The airport has no direct vested interest in Iran's evil plotting. Putting up a Christmas tree is practically a responsibility in such a venue during the holiday season. The airport has no place in the Holocaust denial controversy or preventing a Holocaust II, and therefore in putting up a conifer, the airport is not diverting any energies better spent.

Mark is right on.

Posted by Lanny Ddub 2006-12-17 10:31|| 2006-12-17 10:31|| Front Page Top

#3 No X in Christmas.

Posted by OldSpook 2006-12-17 10:47|| 2006-12-17 10:47|| Front Page Top

#4 No X in Christmas.

OldSpook: You must be one of those Xtians.

/sarcasm, joshing, kidding aside - I have a good idea where you stand religiously.

Posted by xbalanke 2006-12-17 10:55|| 2006-12-17 10:55|| Front Page Top

#5 Obviously Mr. Steyn, whose writings I normally like, never read past the report of the eeeeevil Jewish rabbi who shut down Christmas to find the real story. Y'all know, because it was posted here at Rantburg a few days ago: the Chassidic rabbi who wanted to add a privately funded Chanukkah menorah to the publically funded Christmas trees, and the airport bureaucrat who decided to get rid of the entire display instead, lest any others desire to be allowed to add their own bits to the display. Yes, there was talk about suing if the menorah couldn't be added, but nobody has yet bothered to ask why the rabbi felt it necessary to do so when there are plenty of precedents for allowing such things in the public square. Yes, something like 75% of Americans regard themselves as Christians of one sort or the other, but acknowledging the rest of us does not diminish your holiday. And if you're going to argue Holocaust (a subject upon which I have a few personal credentials), what harm does it do to publically acknowledge -- at least by implication -- that the Jews who were intended to be erased by the Nazi Holocaust are still around to celebrate the holiday commemorating the second time a nation attempted to eradicate its Jewish subjects for daring to worship differently?

How does this diminish Christmas?

/end rant as I glance over at Mr. Wife's 7' Christmas tree in the front room window, then in the other direction at the Hanukkah menorah and dreidles on the kitchen counter, awaiting celebration of the third night of the holiday.

Posted by trailing wife 2006-12-17 14:35|| 2006-12-17 14:35|| Front Page Top

#6 I politely disagree, he was in the wrong. A christmas tree is a secular symbol (of pagan origins IIUC), as is Santa and the reindeer. A Nativity would be a different thing, entirely. Or do you want Islamic, Wiccan and Kwanzaa, etc. displays too?

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-12-17 14:51|| 2006-12-17 14:51|| Front Page Top

#7 Frank, you might enjoy this quiz.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-12-17 15:57|| 2006-12-17 15:57|| Front Page Top

#8 yes, I did :-) thx

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-12-17 16:01|| 2006-12-17 16:01|| Front Page Top

#9 Or do you want Islamic, Wiccan and Kwanzaa, etc. displays too?

I don't have any objections to acknowledging their celebrations... although for some reason I've never been invited to a Saturnalia orgy...

Posted by trailing wife 2006-12-17 16:37|| 2006-12-17 16:37|| Front Page Top

#10 they're the best! Authentic virgin olive oil...uh...nevermind

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-12-17 16:40|| 2006-12-17 16:40|| Front Page Top

#11 Look up the history of "wreath" and crossroads and Rome someday. You might think twice and smile when looking at that wreath.

Posted by 3dc 2006-12-17 18:51|| 2006-12-17 18:51|| Front Page Top

23:26 Swamp Blondie
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:12 JosephMendiola
23:10 Pappy
23:07 Zenster
23:05 JosephMendiola
23:00 Zenster
22:58 Pappy
22:56 Old Patriot
22:45 Sneaze Shaiting3550
22:37 JosephMendiola
22:32 Zenster
22:32 Barbara Skolaut
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:24 trailing wife
22:16 JosephMendiola
22:10 SpecOp35
22:09 Anguper Hupomosing9418
22:07 JosephMendiola
22:01 JosephMendiola
22:01 Zenster
22:00 SpecOp35
21:57 Verlaine
21:49 JosephMendiola