Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 03/24/2007 View Fri 03/23/2007 View Thu 03/22/2007 View Wed 03/21/2007 View Tue 03/20/2007 View Mon 03/19/2007 View Sun 03/18/2007
1
2007-03-24 Iraq
Could Diyala be Al-Qaeda's Waterloo?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by cajunbelle 2007-03-24 14:26|| || Front Page|| [8 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Is Op-Sec Passe? wtf
Posted by RD 2007-03-24 17:45||   2007-03-24 17:45|| Front Page Top

#2 Ever heard of PsyOps? A feint?

Hammer (interior troops) meet anvil (fake out to empty the border area). Terrs caught in between, unable to stop running , unable to R3 (Reorganize Rally and Rest).

If he REALLY needed those troops there RightNow, there is a ready brigade in Kuwait, full up mech infantry ready to roll. Not to mention the Marines off the coast now, and 2 carriers to back them up.

In any event, there are a lot fo thigns going on over there, and the bad guys, for once, have no clue as to where we hit next, and no idea where to hide.
Posted by OldSpook 2007-03-24 17:53||   2007-03-24 17:53|| Front Page Top

#3 Box them into the kill zone and arc light them with B52s. We cannot hope to win this war with burning up our manpower in close up ground ops. Herd them where we want them to go and pulverize them. Word will get out that hell is upon them. We failed to take out 5k Taliban troops and ISI officers at Konduz, Afghanistan back in 2001 or early 2002 when we had the chance, with B52s overhead. And it cost us dearly. We must not fail again. Jeeze Louise, the insane ROEs drive me up the wall.
Posted by Alaska Paul ">Alaska Paul  2007-03-24 18:21||   2007-03-24 18:21|| Front Page Top

#4 at which point, they're Iran's problem

But that wouldn't be the end of them. They'd just R3 there.
Posted by gorb 2007-03-24 18:35||   2007-03-24 18:35|| Front Page Top

#5 Chemical weapons are of little tactical value when the US forces can get effective protective gear quickly. It will however, change the complexion of battle from allowing al-Qaeda to flee into Iran, to "take no prisoners".
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-03-24 18:47||   2007-03-24 18:47|| Front Page Top

#6 "Allowing AQs to scurry to Iran... ahm... I'd agree provided that we have sufficient manpower at the border, in the following pattern ">". Then bullhorn everywhere: "Iran, the land of free AQs!"
Posted by twobyfour 2007-03-24 19:28||   2007-03-24 19:28|| Front Page Top

#7 Ever heard of PsyOps? A feint?

Like trying to explain knifework to the chainsaw-qualified.
Posted by Pappy 2007-03-24 21:22||   2007-03-24 21:22|| Front Page Top

#8 Like trying to explain knifework to the chainsaw-qualified.

A rantburg classic!!
Posted by 49 Pan 2007-03-24 22:15||   2007-03-24 22:15|| Front Page Top

#9 Ever heard of PsyOps? A feint?

Like trying to explain knifework to the chainsaw-qualified.


ahh you attempt a sharp rejoinder using the dullest of knives
Posted by RD 2007-03-24 22:24||   2007-03-24 22:24|| Front Page Top

16:49 Chavilet the Bunyip4128
23:40 Zenster
23:35 Zenster
23:28 Zenster
23:12 Sneaze
23:09 Sneaze
23:07 Capsu 78
22:58 gromgoru
22:58 gromgoru
22:44 Master of Obvious
22:37 Jackal
22:24 RD
22:20 Old Patriot
22:17 Old Patriot
22:15 49 Pan
22:12 49 Pan
22:05 VietVet68
21:58 Eric Jablow
21:53 TomAnon
21:50 USA
21:43 Rob Crawford
21:22 Pappy
21:17 RD
21:05 RD









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com