Article

2007-11-15 Home Front: Politix

Hamas And Other Terrorist Groups Strongly Endorse Hillary

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2007-11-15 09:14|| || Front Page|| [12 views ] Top
File under: Hamas

#1 When the enemies of the United States are crowing for a candidate, ya gotta wonder how far off the rails the candidate is.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2007-11-15 10:20|| 2007-11-15 10:20|| Front Page Top

#2 "I do believe Miss Clinton will have a more balanced policy when it comes to how to solve the Arab-Israeli conflict,"

Dangling the eternal bait for yet another effing gullible chump. Can it be any more clear that there will never be a peaceful solution to the Arab-Israeli "conflict"? Genocide is genocide and the Arabs want nothing less. The Palestinians will never accept any form of coexistence so the entire question is moot. There is no way to solve a conflict that one side does not want resolved, save by permanently maiming the recalcitrant party's military capability.

I remain quite confident that none of this deters Hillaryor any other politician, for that matterfrom lusting after the sure-fire Nobel Prize that such an achievement would surely garner. In reality, the Nobel Committee is a serious culprit in this tiresome Kabuki act. By awarding stooges like Arafat a Peace Prize for his role in this farce, they lend credence to the thought that there will ever be any sort of peaceful coexistence between Islam and Israel. Israel will only find peace once Islam has been dismembered and scattered to the four winds.

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-11-15 11:18|| 2007-11-15 11:18|| Front Page Top

#3 An October 2008 campaign commercial just wrote itself.

Posted by ed 2007-11-15 11:30|| 2007-11-15 11:30|| Front Page Top

#4 Kucinich should be the Hamas candidate by all rights.

Posted by mhw 2007-11-15 11:53|| 2007-11-15 11:53|| Front Page Top

#5 The Arafat apologists have never forgiven Clinton for saying the failure of Camp David was Arafats fault.

I doubt any of the guys quoted has really thought this through.

In fact Ive seen Hillary attacked by Obama supporters for her statements in support of Israel, and of course shes being attacked more recently by Obama for her position on Iran.

As for Clinton vs Bush, what did Clinton do but hold a summit, which is precisely what Bush is doing.

Prior to this, Bush didnt get involved, cause with Arafat leading an intifadah, and later with Abbas trying to negotiate with a Hamas that was running the govt in the PA, there was no Pal partner. Despite Dem attacks on Bush for staying aloof from the peace process, he had no choice.

Evidently some of these terrorists have not understood the situation Bush was in, and have picked up some of the mistake memes attacking Bush. If they had not, they could hardly consider Bush worse for the Pals than Bill Clinton.

Posted by Liberalhawk 2007-11-15 12:05|| 2007-11-15 12:05|| Front Page Top

#6 Despite Dem attacks on Bush for staying aloof from the peace process, he had no choice.

I'd hardly call $400,000,000 "staying aloof".

Posted by Zenster">Zenster 2007-11-15 12:57|| 2007-11-15 12:57|| Front Page Top

#7 Nobody ever said they're smart.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2007-11-15 23:05|| 2007-11-15 23:05|| Front Page Top

23:52 OldSpook
23:27 McZoid
23:14 g(r)omgoru
23:12 g(r)omgoru
23:08 g(r)omgoru
23:05 g(r)omgoru
23:02 3dc
23:00 g(r)omgoru
22:59 g(r)omgoru
22:55 g(r)omgoru
22:53 Grunter
22:52 Sherry
22:45 Cyber Sarge
22:44 3dc
22:42 Sherry
22:42 KBK
22:37 Zenster
22:33 Eric Jablow
22:33 Zenster
22:33 JosephMendiola
22:29 JosephMendiola
22:28 Zenster
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:20 JosephMendiola